Opinion

Prote Contracting Co. v. Board of Education

  • 132 A.D.2d 538
  • 517 N.Y.S.2d 425
  • 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49067
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jul 6, 1987
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.0%

The opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 14, 1986, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s claim that its contract to install windows in Fort Hamilton High School did not require it to install certain items such as glass in the windows as part of the contract price is belied by the explicit provisions of the contract. The *539 plaintiffs claim has no merit and, for that reason, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see, CPLR 3212; Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 112 ). Rubin, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.