Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.29s

  • Little v. Board of Education

    42 A.D.2d 782 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 30, 1973

    and the date of the board meeting at which it is to be considered. … Since the law generally favors the prospective interpretation of a statute without a clear expression from the Legislature to the contrary (Gleason v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Runyan v. Board of Education

    121 A.D.2d 708 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 30, 1986

    ’ failure to allege such service in their complaint was a procedural and not a jurisdictional defect, and Special Term did not err in allowing the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to allege such service (see, Teodoro v … In Kelly v Kane ( 98 AD2d 861, 862 ), it was held that service of a notice of claim after, rather than prior to, commencement of the action, is a procedural defect only "and not fatal to the cause of action”.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Flacks v. Board of Elections

    109 A.D.3d 423 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 14, 2013

    Additionally, the *424 ledger maintained by the Board of Elections correctly identified all of the volumes in the petition. … Our decision in Matter of Feliciano v Guastella ( 98 AD3d 434 [2012]), relied upon by the Board of Elections, is factually distinguishable.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vernat, Inc. v. Cross & Brown Co.

    273 A.D. 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1948

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Riddell v. Brown

    32 A.D.3d 1212 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 2006

    Co. v Piper, 286 AD2d 903 [2001]; Niles v County of Chautauqua, 285 AD2d 988, 989 [2001]). We therefore modify the order by denying the motion of defendant and reinstating the complaint against him.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Belluardo v. Board of Education

    68 A.D.2d 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1979

    Although the letter was not verified, the court has the power to permit the claim to be amended by supplying the omitted verification (McCullough v Board of Educ., 11 AD2d 740 ). … Matter of Yeampierre v Gutman, 52 AD2d 608 ). However, the burden of proving this fact lies with the school board (cf. Matter of Yeampierre v Gutman, supra).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Feinberg v. Board of Education

    78 A.D.2d 889 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 17, 1980

    No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, 380 ). … Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 949 ; Matter of Tadken v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 820 , mot for lv to app den 46 NY2d 711 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kalik v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

    39 A.D.2d 943 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 12, 1972

    Gladstone v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 26 A D 2d 838, affd. 19 N Y 2d 1004). Munder, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stein v. Rent Guidelines Board

    127 A.D.2d 189 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1987

    v Rent Guidelines Bd., 104 Misc 2d 101 [Sup Ct, NY County, Martin B. … Center v Department of Health, 48 NY2d 967, 968-969 [1979]).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. GaNun v. Brown

    244 A.D.2d 441 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Levitch v. Board of Education

    216 A.D. 391 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 16, 1926

    In the action brought by the deceased petitioner against the board of education (Levitch v. Board of Education, 212 App. … (Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson, 196 App. Div. 807, 810 ; Matter of McCarthy v. Board of Education, 106 Misc. 193, 196 , Callaghan, J.).

    Reversed on other grounds by Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 N.Y. 373 (1926)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    33 A.D.3d 386 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 2006

    Those portions of the prosecutor’s summation that defendant characterizes as vouching generally constituted fair comment on the evidence made in response to defense arguments (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997], lv … Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal (see People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv *387 denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Penge v. Board of Education

    10 A.D.3d 251 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 5, 2004

    ]; Hodge v Niagara Falls Gazette Publ. … in part 2 NY3d 819 [2004]; Vachon v State of New York, 286 AJD2d 528 [2001]; Jefferson v Temco Servs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McSweeney v. Board of Education

    138 A.D.2d 847 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 17, 1988

    Board of Educ., 62 NY2d 656, 657 ; Matter of Adrian v Bd. of Educ., 60 AD2d 840 ). … Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233; Matter of Katz v Ambach, 99 AD2d 897 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    58 A.D.2d 876 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1977

    As so modified, judgment affirmed (see People v Smith, 51 AD2d 782 ). Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosen v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    11 A.D.3d 524 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 12, 2004

    Since a civil conspiracy cause of action requires a showing of intentional conduct, negligence cannot serve as the underlying tort (see Sackman v Liggett Group, Inc., 965 F Supp 391, 395 [ED NY 1997]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tessler v. Board of Education

    49 A.D.3d 428 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2008

    Matter of Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v New York City Landmarks Preser v. Commn., 2 NY3d 727 [2004]). … This dispute is not appropriate for resolution in the judicial arena, since the “responsibility for resolving these questions is vested in a network of officials and boards, on both the local and State level” (James v Board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • WEICHERT, SUSAN M. v. BROWN, ROY A.

    133 A.D.3d 1341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 2015

    WEICHERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROY A. BROWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. SUSAN M. WEICHERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE. … [appeal No. 2], 108 AD3d 1127, 1128; see Matter of Reilly v City of Rome, 114 AD3d 1255, 1256).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rudey v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

    233 A.D.2d 148 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kornit v. Board of Education

    54 A.D.2d 959 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 22, 1976

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.