Opinion

Riddell v. Brown

  • 32 A.D.3d 1212
  • 821 N.Y.S.2d 701
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Sep 22, 2006
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered July 5, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to supplement the bill of particulars.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion and reinstating the complaint against defendant Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm (defendant), and other defendants to recover damages for injuries they sustained when they struck an underground gas line, causing an explosion. It appears on the record before us that defendant failed to support his motion with a copy of the pleadings in the action. That failure requires denial of the motion, regardless of its merits (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Piper, 286 AD2d 903 [2001]; Niles v County of Chautauqua, 285 AD2d 988, 989 [2001]). We therefore modify the order by denying the motion of defendant and reinstating the complaint against him. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.