Case law

Petze v. Brown Instrument Co.

215 A.D. 808 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1926

Brown v. Kohler & Campbell, Inc.

4 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1957

Claim of Brown v. O'Brien

226 A.D. 828 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1929

The Board made an award to the claimant March 25, 1927. This was corrected by a new award on May 20, 1927. The employer and the carriel appealed from both awards. … If the Board has opened the previous award and made a new determination on the taking of additional testimony, it should make new findings and a new award, so that the parties may all be informed of their rights.

Brown v. Long Island Railroad

134 A.D. 933 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1909

Brown v. Long Island Railroad

129 A.D. 649 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 1908

Campbel v. Davis Brown, Inc.

176 A.D. 886 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1916

Brown v. Town of Evans

164 A.D. 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1914

Citizens Savings Bank v. Brown

240 A.D. 993 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1933

Brown v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

200 A.D. 853 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1921

Brown v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.

269 A.D. 1021 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1945

Brown v. Hugo Stinnes Corp.

283 A.D. 1026 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 1954

Brown v. Deposit National Bank

234 A.D. 524 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 17, 1932

Mullaney v. Brown

300 A.D.2d 307 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 2002

Brown, District Attorney of Queens County, to file an accusatory instrument, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated June 15, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed … Attorney, 209 AD2d 703 ; Matter of Hynes v Demarest, 202 AD2d 669 ; see also People v Di Falco, 44 NY2d 482 ).

Brown v. City of New York

250 A.D.2d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1998

; Blakeney v City of New York, 222 AD2d 390 ; Panso v Triboro Coach Corp., 172 AD2d 813 ). … (see, Miller v Fernan, supra; Otonoga v City of New York, supra; Connolly v Rogers, supra; see also, Diedrick v City of New York, 162 AD2d 496 ; Douglas v New York City Tr.

People v. Brown

299 A.D.2d 841 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2002

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 ). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hayes, Kehoe, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Brown

300 A.D.2d 660 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2002

Where an insured is required to provide notice as soon as practicable, such notice must be given within a reasonable time under all the circumstances (see Sayed v Macari, 296 AD2d 396 ). … v State Farm Ins.

Brown v. Manhattan Railway Co.

82 A.D. 222 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1903

(Strohm v. N Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 96 N. Y. 305 .) Evidence was given by the plaintiff as to an operation performed for the removal of one of her ovaries. … to board the train after it had started.”

People v. Brown

91 A.D.3d 989 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 5, 2012

III sex offender before Supreme Court, defendant’s claim that the court’s order adopting that classification was not adequately supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law is not properly before us (see People v

People v. Brown

302 A.D.2d 402 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 3, 2003

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 ).

Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Brown

136 A.D. 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1910

creditor, so that the application will show upon its face that the pi’oceeding was authorized by the owner of the judgment,- unless the affidavit is inade by the attorney for a party, when authority will be presumed, (Miller v. … The case, is directly within the rule stated in Brown v. Walker ( 8 N. Y. Supp. 59 ; affd., without opinion, 121 N. Y. 717 .)