Opinion

Brown v. Hugo Stinnes Corp.

  • 283 A.D. 1026
  • 131 N.Y.S.2d 292
  • 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6148
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jun 8, 1954
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

— The defendants are in default only if the stay granted by this court pending the determination of the appeal to' the Court of Appeals does not include the right to interpose answers pursuant to the provisions of section 283 of the Civil Practice Act. Even if the defendants are technically in default, such defaults were due to an understandable inadvertence and have in no wise prejudiced the plaintiffs. Ip view of this circumstance and the further consideration that the *1027 imposition of terms might hamper the Office of Alien Property in its supervision of the affairs of the defendants, we believe that the proper exercise of discretion dictates that the judgments entered herein be vacated and the alleged defaults opened, without conditions. Orders unanimously modified to the extent of eliminating therefrom the provisions requiring the defendants to file surety company bonds and by extending the time of the defendants to answer the complaints herein to ten days after the notice of entry of the orders filed herein. Settle orders on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.