Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.73s

  • Brown v. Di Pronio

    96 A.D.2d 1134 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 1, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Hagan v. Brown Bros.

    207 A.D. 879 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1923

    Award unanimously affirmed, with costs in favor of the State Industrial Board. Present — Cochrane, P. J., H. T. Kellogg, Van Kirk, Hasbrouck and McCann, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewitus v. Brown & Seccomb

    228 A.D. 766 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1930

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walters v. Walters & Brown

    215 A.D. 741 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1925

    Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Loughman v. Brown Bros.

    156 A.D. 904 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Adirondack Farms

    170 A.D. 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1915

    Along this table was a running board on the opposite side to the corn loads. On this running board an operator stood. Bundles of corn tied with twine were pitched down from the loads to the table.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewitus v. Brown & Seccomb

    215 A.D. 806 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prudential Insurance v. Brown

    230 A.D. 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1930

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Congregation Dorshe v. Brown

    89 N.Y.S. 1102 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1904

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Richlins, Inc.

    236 A.D. 669 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1932

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rutherford v. Brown Bros.

    184 A.D. 935 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1918

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laimbeer v. Brown Bros.

    173 A.D. 978 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1916

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Brown Bros.

    147 A.D. 916 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abercrombie v. Brown & Seccomb

    261 A.D. 959 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 1941

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of New York

    146 N.Y.S.3d 160 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 2021

    Brown v City of New York ( 2021 NY Slip Op 01743 ) Brown v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 01743 Decided on March 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to … DUFFY, JJ. 2018-00937 (Index No. 24387/10) [*1]Danna Brown, respondent, v City of New York, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner, Max O.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. County of Nassau

    226 A.D.2d 492 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1996

    plaintiff that the award of summary judgment in favor of the respondents was premature under the circumstances of this case, inasmuch as substantial discovery in the action remains outstanding (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Ross v … Co., 81 NY2d 494 ; Yu v Forero, 184 AD2d 506 ; Efdey Elec. Contrs. v Melita, 167 AD2d 501 ; Smith v City of New York, 133 AD2d 818 ). Accordingly, the complaint is reinstated against the respondents. Balletta, J.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. DiFiore

    139 A.D.3d 1048 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 25, 2016

    This Court affirmed his conviction (see People v Brown, 7 AD3d 535 [2004]). … Conservation, 18 NY3d 652, 657 [2012]; Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d at 462 ; Matter of Friedman v Rice, 134 AD3d at 828 ; Matter of Madera v Elmont Pub. Lib., 101 AD3d at 727).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2018 NY Slip Op 4675 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 2018

    People v Brown ( 2018 NY Slip Op 04675 ) People v Brown 2018 NY Slip Op 04675 Decided on June 26, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on June 26, 2018 Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ. 477/11 1718/11 [*1]6977 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. County of Albany

    271 A.D.2d 819 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 2000

    Lawson Brown, Jr. (hereinafter plaintiff), an attorney, was involved in an automobile accident in May 1995. … we can find no error in the preclusion of his testimony on the issue of causation (see, Schwartz v Gerson, 246 AD2d 589 ; Flamio v State of New York, 132 AD2d 594 ; O’Shea v Sarro, 106 AD2d 435, 437 ; Borden v Brady, supra

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    2018 NY Slip Op 3863 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 2018

    People v Brown ( 2018 NY Slip Op 03863 ) People v Brown 2018 NY Slip Op 03863 Decided on May 30, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … The defendant's contention that the use of the risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders violated his right to due process is without merit ( see People v Warren , 152 AD3d 551 ; People

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.