Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.19s

  • Brown v. Powers

    180 A.D. 885 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1917

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hennessey

    180 A.D. 899 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1917

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    167 A.D.2d 833 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    178 A.D.2d 420 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 1991

    Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … In this regard, we note that the complainant’s testimony demonstrated that the defendant used physical force during the commission of the robbery (see, e.g., People v Crespo, 158 AD2d 466 ; People v Johnstone, 131 AD2d 782

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Emporium

    199 A.D.2d 136 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 1993

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    197 A.D.3d 715 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 25, 2021

    People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 04759 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 04759 Decided on August 25, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … DUFFY PAUL WOOTEN, JJ. 2018-13952 2018-13953 [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Shawn Brown, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 3329/18, 6231/18) Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sarah B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Farnholtz

    135 A.D.2d 1086 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1987

    Memorandum: Farnholtz appeals from an order dismissing three counterclaims in an action brought against him by Brown and dismissing his complaint in his action against Cooper. All three are attorneys. … We note that Special Term’s decision expressly observed that Farnholtz was not prohibited from pursuing claims against either Brown or Cooper for conversion of office equipment, for the fair and reasonable value of services

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Nembhard

    125 A.D.2d 616 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    121 A.D.2d 461 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1986

    P., Gibbons, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    101 A.D.2d 866 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 1984

    P., Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    236 A.D.2d 549 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 18, 1997

    Although the showup identification was overly suggestive, the victim identified the defendant in court based on a sufficiently established independent source (see, People v Ballot, 20 NY2d 600 ). … guilty to attempted robbery in the second degree was a constitutionally obtained predicate conviction and, hence, it served as a proper basis upon which to sentence him as a persistent violent felony offender (see, People v

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    42 A.D.2d 633 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 25, 1973

    first came before this court in 1971, a determination was withheld and the. case remitted to the trial court for the purpose of holding a hearing and rendering a decision based upon the testimony at such hearing (People v. … Brown, 38 A D 2d 651,- 652).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • O'Callaghan v. Brown

    114 A.D.2d 443 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 21, 1985

    recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated January 20, 1984, which, after a traverse hearing, granted the motion of defendants Brown … Order affirmed, with costs to respondents Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Czaplicki

    86 A.D.2d 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 26, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    84 A.D.2d 704 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    83 A.D.2d 639 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 27, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    104 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 22, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    167 A.D.2d 410 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 1990

    In response to the defendant’s omnibus motion, the court had ordered the People to turn over a list of potential witnesses in conformance with People v Minor ( 118 Misc 2d 351 ; see also, People v Copicotto, 50 NY2d 222 ) … Finally, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    69 A.D.2d 867 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 16, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    99 A.D.2d 652 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.