Opinion

People v. Brown

  • 197 A.D.3d 715
  • 150 N.Y.S.3d 586
  • 2021 NY Slip Op 04759
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Aug 25, 2021
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.7%

The opinion

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 04759 )

People v Brown

2021 NY Slip Op 04759

Decided on August 25, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 25, 2021

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

ROBERT J. MILLER

COLLEEN D. DUFFY

PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2018-13952

2018-13953

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shawn Brown, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 3329/18, 6231/18)

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sarah B. Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Michael D. Kitsis, J., at pleas; Raymond L. Rodriguez, J., at sentences), both rendered September 12, 2018, convicting him of petit larceny under Superior Court Information No. 3329/18, and attempted burglary in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 6231/18, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California ( 386 US 738 ), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 US 738 ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal from the judgments. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see id. ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 ; People v Paige , 54 AD2d 631 ).

MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER, DUFFY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Acting Clerk of the Court

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.