Case law

New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Department of Labor

88 N.Y.2d 225 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1996

New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 ; see also, Matter of Schwartfigure v Hartnett, 83 NY2d 296, 301 ; Matter of Cordero v Corbisiero, 80 NY2d 771, 772-773 ). … This construction, pertaining to a matter within the area of expertise of the Department and the Board, appears reasonable (see, Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 451, 459 ).

MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley

16 N.Y.2d 1071 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1965

16 N.Y.2d 1071 (1965) In the Matter of the New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, Appellant, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. … In the Matter of Amalia V. Betanzos et al., Appellants, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

People v. Foster

19 N.Y.2d 150 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1967

The defendant relies upon People v. Brown (21 A D 2d 738) in support of his position. … In People v.

Claim of Cohen v. New York City Department of Environmental Protection

5 N.Y.3d 872 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2005

Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau

72 N.Y.2d 62 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1988

The Fund is administered by a seven-member Board of Trustees (the Board), appointed by the Court of Appeals. … Co. v Smith Co., 46 NY2d 498, 504 ; see generally, 57 NY Jur, Subrogation, §§ 15, 26).

Davidson v. . Village of White Plains

197 N.Y. 266 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1910

Y. 585 ) and Swift v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y. ( 83 N. Y. 528 ). … Under the statutory scheme the board of education was to deliver to the creditor its draft on the comptroller, who was required to pay the same if there were funds to the credit of the board sufficient for the purpose.

Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.

93 N.Y.2d 343 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1999

The Appellate Division confirmed the Board’s determination (Matter of Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 222 AD2d 437 , lv denied 87 NY2d 812 ). … Board of Trustees, supra, 68 NY2d, at 705 [citing Davidson v Capuano, 792 F2d 275]).

Koch v. Mayor of New York

152 N.Y. 72 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

III, § 1; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. Y. 467 ; People ex rel. McLean v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 .) … (Wenz ler v. People, supra; People ex rel. Gere v. Whitlock, 92 N. Y. 191 .)

Cuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.

71 N.Y.2d 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1988

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board affirmed. … Assn. v Chu (supra), and NYPIRG v Carey (supra).

Helfand v. Meisser

22 N.Y.2d 762 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1968

Schieffelin v. . Hylan

236 N.Y. 254 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1923

In Kingman v. … In Stegmaier v.

People v. Richmond County News, Inc.

9 N.Y.2d 578 · New York Court of Appeals · May 25, 1961

John-Stevas, Obscenity and the Law [1956], p. 196; see, also, Brown v. Kingsley Books , 1 N Y 2d 177, 181, n. 3 [affd. sub nom. Kingsley Books v. Brown, 354 U. S. 436 ]; United. States v. … As we wrote in Brown v.

Meyer v. Whisnant

307 N.Y. 369 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1954

Such violations as Whisnant may have been guilty of were no proof of negligent causation by him, since there was no possible logical connection between any of them, and the accident (see Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. … Y. 176, 180 ; Tedla v. Ellman, 280 N. Y. 124 ; Hagadorn v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 298 N. Y. 882 ; Goldblatt v. Tabacco, 299 N. Y. 663 ; Restatement, Torts, § 286). The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lyman v. . Village of Potsdam

228 N.Y. 398 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1920

(Callanan v. Gilman, 107 N. Y. 360 ; Jorgensen v. Squires, 144 N. Y. 280 ; Tolman & Co. v. City of Chicago, 240 Ill. 268 .) … Y. 278 ; Weston v. City of Troy, 139 N. Y. 281 ; Farley v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 152 N. Y. 222 ; Simonds v. Maine Telephone & Tel. Co., 104 Me. 440 ; Horr v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R.

Matter of Seymour v. Odd Fellows' Home

267 N.Y. 354 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1935

In Matter of Hall v. Salvation Army ( 261 N. … (Ferro v. Sinsheimer Estate, Inc., 256 N. Y. 398 .) It is to be noted that this decedent not only did not work any regular hours but was under no duty to work at all, if he did not so desire.

Claim of Cook v. Buffalo General Hospital

308 N.Y. 480 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1955

The board made its award against the special employer only. … Having announced that the board has power to make the award against either or both, the courts cannot complain if the board exercises the power, case by case, as it sees fit. The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Matter of Robert Lee Realty Co. v. Vill. of Spring Valley

61 N.Y.2d 892 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1984

Home Constr. v Van Wagner, 41 NY2d 1028 ; Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals, 30 NY2d 238 ). … Corp. v Town Bd., 88 AD2d 978 ; RPM Motors v Gulotta, 88 AD2d 658 ; Matter of Hobbs v Albanese, 70 AD2d 1049 ).

Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's Cathedral

245 N.Y. 201 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 1927

(Matter of Madura v. City of New York, 238 N. Y. 214 .) … The State Industrial Board excused the failure on the ground that the employer was not prejudiced thereby, because verbal notice was given to the employer and the employer had actual knowledge of the accident within thirty

Lamb v. Meisser

13 N.Y.2d 874 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1963

Claim of Klimas v. Trans Caribbean Airways, Inc.

10 N.Y.2d 209 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961

(Accord: Matter of Wachsstock v. Skyview Transp. Co., supra [fright]; Matter of Thompsons v. City of Binghamton, supra [excitement], relying on Matter of Pickerell v. Schumacher, supra.) … Upon the facts developed in this record, the common-sense viewpoint of the average man would in our opinion be in accord with the board that this was an industrial accident (Matter of Masse v. Robinson Co., 301 N.