Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.02s
71 N.Y.2d 484 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1988
In April 1985, he was served with a notice of hearing and statement of charges by the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct (State Board). … 315 ), "and however cleverly the error may be characterized by counsel as an excess of jurisdiction or power” (Matter of Rush v Mordue, supra, at 353).
Cited 45 timesPublishedMatter of Rosenthal v. McGoldrick
280 N.Y. 11 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1939
It confers upon the administrative officer or board power only to determine the amount which, in the opinion of the officer or board, is required to carry out in proper manner a specified public purpose. … (Matter of McAneny v. Bd. of Estimate & Apportionment, 232 N. Y. 377, 387 ; People ex rel. Simon v. Bradley, 207 N. Y. 592 ; Matter of McKinney v. McGoldrick, 243 App. Div. 210 ; affd., 266 N. Y. 632 .)
Cited 9 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Williamsb'h G.L. Co. v. . Assess'rs
76 N.Y. 202 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1879
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Lieberman v. . Vandecarr
175 N.Y. 440 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1903
In Metropolitan Board of Health v. Heister ( 37 N. … (Metropolitan Board of Health v. Heister, 37 N. Y. 661 ; Health Department v. Knoll, 70 N. Y. 530 ; The People ex rel. Cox v. The Justices of Special Sessions, 7 Hun, 214 .)
Cited 52 timesPublished305 N.Y. 426 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1953
Hardy, with whom the paper was left, was neither a member of the board of education nor “ the clerk ” of that board. … (See Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N. Y. 440 .)
Cited 29 timesPublishedMatter of Clarke v. Town of Russia
283 N.Y. 272 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1940
(Kittle v. Town of Kinderhook, 214 App. Div. 345, 350 .) … (Matter of Swihura v. Horowitz, 242 N. Y. 523 ; Herbold v. Neff, 200 App. Div. 244 .)
Cited 16 timesPublishedIn Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of Hoople
179 N.Y. 308 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1904
Y. 272 ; Lewis v. State of N. Y., 96 id. 71; Locke v. State of N. Y., 140 id. 480; Smith v. Reeves, 178 U. S. 436 ; Flagg v. … In that case the claim was presented after the state board of audit had been abolished and the state board of claims had been created.
Cited 34 timesPublished6 N.Y.2d 168 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1959
(Easton v. Pickersgill, 55 N. Y. 310, 315 ; City of New York v. New York City *174 Ry. co., 193 N. Y. 543 ; Bareham v. City of Rochester, 246 N. … It must be conceded that, for some purposes, a member of a County Board of Supervisors elected from a city is a city officer. (See Lane v. Johnson, 283 N. Y. 244 ; People ex rel. Clancy v. Board of Supervisors, 139 N.
Cited 15 timesPublished22 N.Y.2d 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1968
and the Board of Assessors of the Town of Cortlandt, is that the petitioner is operating the home in a manner which is contrary to the clearly expressed intention of its benefactor, that, although the operation of the home … In the instant case not only does the concession obviate the necessity for any discussion of the problem (see Matter of Leonescu v. Star Liq. Dealers, 20 N Y 2d 956, 958; Radosh v.
Cited 1 timesPublished22 N.Y.2d 356 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1968
Conlon et al., in Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Thomas F. … Div. 385 , affd. 280 N.Y. 697 ; see, also, Matter of Deodati v. Kern , 280 N.Y. 366 ; cf. Matter of Ebling v. New York State Civ. Serv. Comm. , 305 N.Y. 221 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedPresident Self Service, Inc. v. Affiliated Restaurateurs, Inc.
280 N.Y. 354 · New York Court of Appeals · May 23, 1939
An objection has been raised that the determination of the Appellate Division is not appealable to this court, reliance being placed upon Matter of Arcadu v. Levinson ( 250 N. Y. 355 ). … (See Matter of Marchant v. Meadr-Morrison Manufacturing Co., 252 N. Y. 284, 292; Matter of Hosiery Manufacturers Corp. v. Goldston, 238 N. Y. 22, 25, 26 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedMatter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y.
203 N.Y. 548 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1911
Order affirmed for the reason that even if subdivision 12 of section 67 of the by-laws of the board of education of the city of New York should be held unreasonable, and said board should have passed upon the relator’s nomination … board of education and while a vacancy existed to which said board could have appointed the relator.
Cited 29 timesPublishedMatter of Bakers Mut. Ins. Co.(dept. of Health)
301 N.Y. 21 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1950
People v. Blanchard, 288 N. Y. 145 ). … Thomas v. Morris, 286 N. Y. 266, 269-270 ).
Cited 23 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Stapleton v. . Bell
119 N.Y. 175 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1889
In People ex rel. v. … ((People ex rel. v. Thacker, 55 N. Y. 525 .)
Cited 30 timesPublishedCorcoran v. Banner Super Market, Inc.
19 N.Y.2d 425 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1967
The board which fell upon the plaintiff was five and one-half inches wide. It stood on top of another board and together the two boards filled in the five and one-half-inch space between 2052 and 2054 Flatbush Avenue. … In Ybarra v.
Modified on other grounds by Corcoran v. Banner Super Market, Inc., 21 N.Y.2d 793 (1968)Cited 97 timesPublished11 N.Y.3d 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2008
At the time of his application in May 2006, defendant had been denied parole release and was scheduled to appear before the parole board again in April 2008” (People v Mills, 48 AD3d 1108 [4th Dept 2008] [internal quotation … Parris, 35 AD3d 891, 892 [2d Dept 2006]; People v Thomas, 35 AD3d 895, 896 [3d Dept 2006]; People v Smith, 45 AD3d 1478 [4th Dept 2007]).
Cited 32 timesPublished
Ask Donna