Opinion

Matter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y.

203 N.Y. 548
96 N.E. 406
1911 N.Y. LEXIS 845

Court: New York Court of Appeals
Filed: Oct 10, 1911
Status: Published
On the bench: <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
Cited by: 29 cases
Authority: More cited than 96.0%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Order

affirmed for the reason that even if subdivision 12 of section 67 of the by-laws of the board of education of the city of New York should be held unreasonable, and said board should have passed upon the relator’s nomination by the board of superintendents in disregard of such by-law, the application to the court for a writ of mandamus was not made within forty days from the filing of such recommendation in the office of the secretary of said board of education and while a vacancy existed to which said board could have appointed the relator. The other questions presented upon this appeal are not passed upon. No costs are allowed on this appeal.

Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.