Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

2.38s

  • Claim of Namanowich v. En Operating Corp.

    17 N.Y.2d 642 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1966

    Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of Campbell

    170 N.Y. 84 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1902

    (Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; Matter of Conway, 124 ib. 455.) … *pp. 114-191; Brown v. Clark, supra; In the Goods of Reynolds, L. R. [3 Probate & Divorce] 35.) In Brown v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Claim of Kestenbaum v. Dunrite Painting Co.

    10 N.Y.2d 838 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1961

    Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claim of Surdi v. Premium Coal & Oil Co.

    52 N.Y.2d 860 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1981

    Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d, at p 965), to which we add only that as in Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Claim of Kuk v. General Electric Co.

    74 N.Y.2d 758 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1989

    Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal to that court from the Workers’ Compensation Board’s February 24, 1987 decision, dismissed upon the ground that

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Gormeley v. New York Daily News

    24 N.Y.2d 867 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1969

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fred W. Hoch Associates, Inc. v. Western Newspaper Union, Inc.

    308 N.Y. 461 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1955

    Y. 400, 408 ; Erben v. Lorillard, 19 N. Y. 299 ; Russell v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 96 App. Div. 151, 153 ; Martin v. Paddleford, 183 App. Div. 354 ; see Greenberg v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 266 App. … Such testimony was not admissible as proof of what Brown said; at best, what plaintiff told Chernoble that Brown had said Avas hearsay from Chernoble’s lips.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Claim of Allen v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car

    9 N.Y.3d 912 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kramm v. Richards

    60 N.Y.2d 641 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Lycoming County Mutual Insurance

    67 N.Y. 274 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1876

    Co. v. Nat. Protection, Ins. Co., 20 Barb., 468 ; Inman v. Western Fire Ins. Co., 12 Wend., 452 .) What is a reasonable time depends upon all the circumstances of the case. … (Roth v. The Buffalo and State Line R. R. Co., 34 N. Y., 548 ; Hedge v. The Hudson River R. R. Co.,. 49 id., 223; Witbeck v. Holland, 45 id., 13.)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Claim of Henin v. Merit Investors Corp.

    45 N.Y.2d 924 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Tait v. Town of Delhi

    13 N.Y.2d 656 · New York Court of Appeals · May 9, 1963

    Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Cramer v. Barney's Clothing Store

    13 N.Y.2d 711 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1963

    Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the award upon the authority of Matter of Klimas v. Trans Caribbean Airways (10 N T 2d 209).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Depczynski v. Adsco/Farrar & Trefts

    84 N.Y.2d 593 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1994

    While we disagree that the Board’s interpretation of the statutory term "knowledge” — a law question — is entitled to deference (see, Matter of Thomas v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 63 NY2d 150, 154 ), we agree with respondents … Co., 782 F Supp 477 [CD Cal 1991]; Jones v Maine Cent. R. R. Co., 690 F Supp 73 [D Me 1988]; McCoy v Union Pac. R. R.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Claim of Poupard v. Mohonasen Central School District

    56 N.Y.2d 764 · New York Court of Appeals · May 18, 1982

    OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs (Matter of Jefferson v Bronx Psychiatric Center, 55 NY2d 69 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Beck-Nichols v. Bianco

    20 N.Y.3d 540 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2013

    In Matter of Beck-Nichols v Bianco: Judgment reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. In Matter of Adrian v Board of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of City of Niagara Falls: Order affirmed, with costs. … In Matter of Luchey v Board of Educ. of City Sch.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Ward v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

    152 N.Y. 39 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

    (Phelan v. Brady, 119 N. Y. 587 ; Page v. Waring, 76 N. Y. 463, 470 ; Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 76 ; Holland v. Brown, 140 N. Y. 344, 347 .) … (Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519, 531 ; Uline v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 101 N. Y. 98, 126 ; Pappenheim v. M. E. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 436, 451 ; Galway v. M. E. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 132, 156 ; Wharton on Evidence, § 1332.)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Matter of Douglas v. . Bd. of Supervisors

    172 N.Y. 309 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1902

    Barnard v. Wemple, 117 N. Y. 77 .) … (Hagner v. Hall, 10 App. Div. 581 ; affirmed, on opinion below, 159 N. Y. 552 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Claim of Gibbons v. Zara Construction Co.

    52 N.Y.2d 784 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1980

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Miles-Stallworth v. Lakeshore Nursing Home

    8 N.Y.3d 978 · New York Court of Appeals · May 8, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.