Opinion

Claim of Surdi v. Premium Coal & Oil Co.

  • 52 N.Y.2d 860
  • 437 N.Y.S.2d 78
  • 418 N.E.2d 671
  • 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2182
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 8, 1981
Status
Published
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 91.4%

The opinion

*862 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and the penalty fixed by the referee reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d, at p 965), to which we add only that as in Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. ( 49 NY2d 451, 459 ) so here the issue is one of legislative intent rather than administrative expertise.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.