Case law

People v. Globe Mutual Life Insurance

15 Abb. N. Cas. 75 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1884

Brown, on January 23, 1865, procured from the Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company a ten years policy on his life for $10,000, loss payable to his wife, Mary M. Brown. … Brown, having made her claim under the paid-up policy, has thereby ratified the act of her husband in procuring it, and on the principles stated in Coyle v. City of Brooklyn, 53 Barb. 41 , 56 ; Baker v.

Matter of Craig v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City of Yonkers

41 N.Y.2d 832 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1977

. *833 Nor can we conclude that, consideration of section 107-55 (D) (2) aside, it was an abuse of discretion on the part of the Zoning Board of Appeals to have denied appellant’s application for a variance in this instance … (Matter of Cherry Hill Homes v Barbiere, 28 NY2d 381, 384 .) Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur. Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Rosen v. McNab

25 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1969

Each received a receipt from the Board of Elections attesting to the number of sheets filed. … The board’s responsibility extends only to the examination of the particular petitions under consideration— and of course any other petitions before the board — for the purpose of ascertaining whether they were signed by

People v. Harris

72 N.Y.2d 614 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1988

In Brown v Illinois ( 422 US 590 ), the Supreme Court clarified the Wong Sun decision and addressed the proper effect that should be given to Miranda warnings administered after an illegal arrest. … The Circuit Court of Appeals, applying Payton, held the arrest was illegal and, after applying the rule in Brown v Illinois (supra), it suppressed both confessions.

Bank of Yorktown v. Boland

280 N.Y. 673 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1939

Orders reversed, without costs, on authority of Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York ( 276 N. … Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board ( 280 N. Y. 194 ). First question certified answered in the affirmative. Other questions certified not answered. No opinion. Concur: Crane, Ch.

Bull v. Stichman

298 N.Y. 516 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1948

Claim of Coleman v. Guide-Kalkhoff-Burr, Inc.

10 N.Y.2d 857 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1961

Barrett v. . John v. Schaefer, Jr., Company

218 N.Y. 732 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1916

Smith v. New York Central Railroad

4 Keyes 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1868

(Downs v. Ross, 23 Wend. 270 .) In the case of Garbutt v. … And in Smith v.

Claim of Bozier v. A & P Shopwell

94 N.Y.2d 814 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1999

B'd of Com'rs of Excise, Etc. v. . Burtis

103 N.Y. 136 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1886

upon the new board the duty to prosecute for violations- of the excise law. … of commissioners of excise cannot be held to be one of the duties devolved upon the new board created for the city.

Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric Center

92 N.Y.2d 100 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

The carrier sought review before the Board. The Board affirmed the award and the penalty assessed against the carrier. … on Matter of White v New York City Hous.

Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.

18 N.Y.2d 736 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1966

Mahoney v. Michaels Stern & Co.

9 N.Y.2d 931 · New York Court of Appeals · May 18, 1961

Order reversed, with costs against respondents employer and carrier; and the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated on the ground that the determination of the board was supported by substantial evidence.

Casado v. Markus

16 N.Y.3d 329 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2011

Petitioners rely on Matter of New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. v Nassau County Rent Guidelines Bd. ( 53 AD3d 550 [2d Dept 2008]), which invalidated an order of the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board permitting … It could be argued that, in making distinctions based on tenant income, the Nassau County Rent Guidelines Board trespassed on a sensitive policy area that is *338 within the Legislature’s special province (see Boreali v Axelrod

Matter of Onteora Club v. Bd. of Assessors of the Town of Hunter

13 N.Y.2d 1170 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1964

Foster v. Van Wyck

4 Abb. Pr. 469 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1867

See also Henderson v. Brown ( 1 Cai., 92 ). Section 4 of the act in effect allows ministers of the gospel to hold property to the amount of $1,5.00 exempt from taxation. In Barhyte v. Shepherd (35 N. … In Osborn v.

People v. Hansen

38 N.Y.2d 17 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1975

v Callandra, 414 US 338, 348 ; Brown v United States, 411 US 223, 227 ; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 389 ; Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 492 ; Jones v United States, 362 US 257 ; cf. … decision in Jones *23 (Brown v United States, supra, pp 227-228).

Carol Artibee v. Home Place Corporation

28 N.Y.3d 739 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 2017

To be sure, defendant’s argument finds support in various commentaries and lower court cases (see Brown v State of New York, 268 AD2d 548, 549 [2d Dept 2000]; Duffy v County of Chautauqua, 225 AD2d 261, 267 [4th Dept 1996 … Board of Educ. of the City Sch.

MATTER OF THWAITES PLACE ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.

54 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1981