Opinion

Claim of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen, Inc.

18 N.Y.2d 736
274 N.Y.S.2d 346
221 N.E.2d 171
1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1106

Court: New York Court of Appeals
Filed: Sep 29, 1966
Status: Published
On the bench: Adduced, Bebgan, Bubke, Desmond, Dismiss, Fuld, Ground, Keating, Only, Relationship, Scileppi, Speculative, Support, Testified, Testimony, Upon, Voobhis, Vote, Whose, Witness
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 54.2%

The opinion

Order affirmed, Avith costs; no opinion.

*738 Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the following ground: There ivas insufficient medical testimony to establish a causal relationship. The operating neurosurgeon testified to no causal relationship and the only evidence adduced to support it was by an expert witness qualified only in other fields whose opinion was purely speculative.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.