Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • People v. Roque

    99 N.Y.2d 50 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2002

    1999]; People v Carter, 169 Misc 2d 230 [Crim Ct, Kings County 1996]). … Receiving no response, Officer Ferguson instructed Officer Brown, who was in the area, either to “watch” or “hold” defendant. Officer Brown did not physically hold defendant, but defendant stopped.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Cerami v. Rochester City School District

    74 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1989

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF WOOD v. Laidlaw Tr.

    77 N.Y.2d 79 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1990

    We now reverse and reinstate the Board’s determination. … While generally our review is limited to whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination (see, Matter of Black v Metropolitan Tobacco, 71 NY2d 989 ), here the underlying question of the meaning

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Maragh

    94 N.Y.2d 569 · New York Court of Appeals · May 9, 2000

    Brown, supra, at 394). … Fund [appeal No. 1], 177 AD2d 1033 , citing People v Legister, 75 NY2d 832, 833 , supra; Alford v Sventek, 53 NY2d 743, 745 ; People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 393 , supra; see also, Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 6-112 [b]

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • Dustan v. . McAndrew

    44 N.Y. 72 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1870

    Brown, or some other inspector satisfactory to both parties. In case J. S. … Brown could not, or should not inspect them for any reason, then they were to be inspected by some other person mutually satisfactory. 27either party had the right to demand any other inspector, unless Brown neglected or

    Cited 95 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. . Dox

    34 N.Y. 307 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1866

    The case of Brown v. Lynch ( 1 Paige, 147 ), is so like to that now under consideration that it may be profitable to refer to it at length. … Justice Emott, in the case of Bergen v. Nelson (not reported), was read, distinctly affirming the doctrine of Brown v. Lynch (supra). The case of Osborn v.

    Cited 136 timesPublished
  • Beisegel v. New York Central Railroad

    14 Abb. Pr. 29 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1870

    By this I understand the judge as referring to signals to be given on board the engine, and not those to be given by persons employed for that purpose at the crossing or elsewhere. … It was held in Brown v. Buffalo & State Line R. R. Co., 22 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

    16 N.Y.2d 642 · New York Court of Appeals · May 27, 1965

    *644 Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cosgrove v. . Ogden

    49 N.Y. 255 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1872

    The defendants were responsible for this act of Brown. … (Weed v. The Panama Railroad Co., 17 N. Y., 362; Mali v. Lord, 39 id., 381 , and cases cited.)

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.

    37 N.Y.2d 395 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1975

    In Victorson the extractor was sold in 1948 and the injury occurred in 1969; in Rivera the sale was in 1959, the injury in 1967; and in Brown the sale was in 1955 and the injury in 1965. … (Hornung v Richardson-Merrill, 317 F Supp 183 , supra; Williams v Brown Mfg.

    Cited 202 timesPublished
  • Claim of Terranova v. Lehr Construction Co.

    28 N.Y.3d 948 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Helstrom

    51 N.Y.2d 767 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1980

    Zeronda, Inc. v Town Bd. of Town of Halfmoon, 37 NY2d 198 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of 9th & 10th Street LLC v. Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York

    9 N.Y.3d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Shambo v. Orkin Pest Control

    3 N.Y.3d 734 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Amoroso v. Tubular & Cast Products Manufacturing Co.

    13 N.Y.2d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1963

    In our view there was no substantial evidence before the board upon which an award could be legally predicated. (See Matter of Miller v. National Cabinet Co., 8 N Y 2d 277; Matter of Riehl v. Town of Amherst, 308 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Claim of Sanders v. Samsol Homes, Inc.

    68 N.Y.2d 906 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1986

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sidwell v. . Greig

    157 N.Y. 30 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1898

    (Pugsley v. Kesselburgh, 7 How. Pr. R. 402; Brown v. Brown, 6 N. Y. 106 ; Cook v. Nellis, 18 N. Y. 126 .) In Brown v. … In Cook v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Claim of Paivanas v. Resource Center

    16 N.Y.3d 781 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Zamora v. New York Neurologic Associates

    16 N.Y.3d 850 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ellwood v. . Northrup

    106 N.Y. 172 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1887

    (Rogers v. Dill, 6 Hill, 415 ; Forman v. Marsh, 11 N. Y. 544, 551; Baker v. Lorillard , 4 id. 257 .) … (Stilwell v. Swarthout, 81 N. Y. 109 ; Rea v. McEachron, 13 Wend. 465 .)

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.