Opinion

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

  • 16 N.Y.2d 642
  • 261 N.Y.S.2d 79
  • 209 N.E.2d 120
  • 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
May 27, 1965
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*644 Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice Herlihy in the first appeal to the Appellate Division (18 A D 2d 849). Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.