Case law

Claim of Hill v. Thompson

61 N.Y.2d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1984

from these facts are conclusive on the courts if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Axel v Duffy-Mott Co., 47 NY2d 1, 6 ). … Order reversed, with costs, and decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum.

Ornstein v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

10 N.Y.3d 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

Relying on the Appellate Division decision in Brown v New York City Health & Hosps. … In concluding that plaintiffs damages should be restricted to those suffered during the six months following the HIV exposure incident, the Appellate Division largely relied on Brown v New York City Health & Hosps.

The People v. Darryl Watts

New York Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2024

In preparation for that release date, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board) recommended that defendant be adjudicated a level 2 (moderate risk) offender under SORA. … As we reaffirmed in People v Brown, an offender has a “liberty interest in a criminal designation that rationally fits [their] conduct and public safety risk” (-- NE3d -- , 2023 WL 8039655, at *6 [2023]).

Bonner v. City of New York

73 N.Y.2d 930 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1989

The jury returned a verdict of $200,000 in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Board of Education, finding plaintiff 50% responsible for his own injuries. … City of New York, 60 NY2d 861 ; Glick v City of New York, 42 NY2d 831 , affg on mem at 53 AD2d 528 ; see also, Marilyn S. v City of New York, 73 NY2d 910 [decided today]).

De Carlo v. Town of Lowville

21 N.Y.2d 872 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1968

Bell v. . Dagg

60 N.Y. 528 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1875

There can be no doubt of the correctness of the general proposition that, upon the sale of a note or other written obligation, there is an implied warranty by the vendor of the genuineness of the instrument. ( Whitney v. … Defendant disclaimed any personal acquaintance with Brown.

People Ex Rel. Noyes v. . Bd. of Canvassers

126 N.Y. 392 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1891

Yates v. Ferguson (8 Cowen, 102), decided in 1827, turned upon the effect to be given to certain ballots, which the inspectors had rejected as defective. … (People v. Pease, 27 N. Y. 85 , 86.) They are mere exhibits that no more control the words of the statement than did the defective ballots, when first required to be preserved and attached.

Bates v. Artistic Lamp Manufacturing Co.

17 N.Y.2d 784 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1966

Claim of Watford v. Continental Can Co.

38 N.Y.2d 213 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1975

For lack of such an explicit finding the matter should be remitted to the board to redetermine the allocation of causation. … Matter of Phillips v Holmes Express Co., 229 NY 527 ; Matter of Anderson v Babcock & Wilcox Co., 256 NY 146 , supra).

Benigno v. Cohalan

40 N.Y.2d 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1976

Appellant has, however, been restored to his former position because, as we are informed, the town board has executed a release of the declaration of covenants and restrictions recorded by him in anticipation of an effective

Hedeman v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

286 N.Y. 240 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1941

Plaintiff called Brown’s attention to the Triangle Company, a long-time successful distributor, and inquired of Brown as to how a contract with that concern, which might be for a long term, would affect his, contract with … Hawley, 1 Daly, 327 ; Bingham v. Harris, 10 Daly, 522 , affd., 97 N. Y. 626 ; Merkel v. Lazard, 114 App. Div. 25 ; Lilienthal v. German American Brewing Co., 121 App. Div. 628 ).

MATTER OF SEIDNER v. Town of Colonie

55 N.Y.2d 613 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1981

The record does not support petitioner’s contention that the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a rehearing on her application for a variance. … In this regard, there is no proof that a majority of the members of the respondent board ever voted on petitioner’s request for a rehearing (Town Law, §267, subd 6) or that a rehearing was held upon the notice required by

Bates v. Artistic Lamp Manufacturing Co.

20 N.Y.2d 741 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1967

The Matter of Penny Mintz v. The Board of Elections in the , City of New York

New York Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2018

No. 127 In the Matter of Penny Mintz, &c., Appellant, v. The Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondent, Rachel Lavine, Intervenor-Respondent. Arthur Z. … -2- Matter of Mintz v Board of Elections No. 127 WILSON, J.

People v. Vasquez

88 N.Y.2d 561 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1996

Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 ; People v Edwards, 47 NY2d 493, 497 ; Fisch, New York Evidence § 1000 [2d ed]). … Brown, supra, 70 NY2d, at 518 ).

Claim of Jungels v. SUNY Buffalo

20 N.Y.3d 915 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2012

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the April 2012 Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal *916 from the October 2009 Workers’ Compensation Board decision, denied; motion for leave to appeal

MATTER OF KEARNEY v. New York State Bd. of Parole

11 N.Y.3d 817 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2008

Silsbury & Calkins v. McCoon & Sherman

3 N.Y. 379 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1850

In Betts v. … The same rule has been adopted in Pennsylvania. ( Snyder v. Vaux, 2 Rawle, 427 .) And in Maine and Massachusetts it has been applied to a wilful intermixture of goods. ( Ryder v. Hathaway, 21 Pick . 304, 5; Wingate v.

People Ex Rel. v. . Supervisors of Queens Co.

82 N.Y. 275 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1880

The jurisdiction of the supervisors and the power of the board to change the roll terminated with the levy *278 of the tax, and the delivery of the tax-roll and warrant to the proper town officers. … (People v. Supervisors of Allegany, 15 Wend. 211 ; People ex rel. v. Supervisors of Queens, 1 Hill, 195 ; People v. Mayor, etc., 2 id. 10; People ex rel. v. Delaney, 49 N. Y. 655 ; People ex rel. v.

Claim of Gates v. McBride Transportation, Inc.

60 N.Y.2d 670 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated. … A finding of fact made by the Workers’ Compensation Board is considered conclusive on the courts if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Axel v Duffy-Mott Co., 47 NY2d 1, 6 ).