Opinion

Claim of Gates v. McBride Transportation, Inc.

  • 60 N.Y.2d 670
  • 468 N.Y.S.2d 101
  • 455 N.E.2d 660
  • 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3373
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Sep 27, 1983
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 94.2%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated.

A finding of fact made by the Workers’ Compensation Board is considered conclusive on the courts if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Axel v Duffy-Mott Co., 47 NY2d 1, 6 ). In this case, the board’s finding that the claimant’s heart attack was causally related to his employment was supported by substantial evidence: claimant’s own testimony that he was irritated by a phone call he received, requiring him to redo an entire morning’s work, and the fact that claimant experienced the heart attack very shortly after the phone call. In addition, there was medical testimony as to the causal relationship. Inasmuch as there was substantial evidence to support the determination of the board, the Appellate Division erred in reversing that determination.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.