Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • State v. Smith

    130 N.J. Super. 442 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 1974

    Bearing in mind that the constitutionality of a statute does not turn on whether it is a wise one in a judge’s view, Brown v. Heymann, 62 N. … Schierstead v. Brigantine, 20 N. J. 164, 169 (1955). In Motyka v. McCorkle, 58 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.

    82 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1964

    Super., at p. 459 ) Compare Cuna v. Board of Fire Com'rs, Avenel, 79 N.J. Super. 264 ( App. Div. 1963), and see Gordon, "Judicial Pathways in Workmen's Compensation," 16 Rutgers L. Rev. 284 , 289 (1962). … Co., 288 U.S. 162, 169-170 , 53 S.Ct. 380, 383 , 77 L.Ed. 676, 680 (1933); Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp., 134 *236 N.J.L. 444, 447 ( Sup.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bor. of Allendale v. Tp. Committee of Mahwah

    169 N.J. Super. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1979

    Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 72 N.J. 481 (1977). The Allendale master plan proclaims it to be fully developed and under no similar obligation. See Pascack Ass'n, Ltd. v. … Its planning board is currently processing an application to construct 200 mixed units of one-family homes, townhouses and garden apartments on the site.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gabriel Ades v. Borough of Deal

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 2026

    A-1972-24 GABRIEL ADES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Plaintiff challenged the added assessment to the Monmouth County Board of Taxation (the board).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • CES Associates v. Cranbury Township

    15 N.J. Tax 677 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 1995

    In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs appeal from Tax Court judgments affirming the determinations of the Middlesex County Board of Taxation to deny farmland assessments. … We regard West Orange Tp. v. Joseph Kushner Hebrew Academy, 13 N.J.Tax 48 (Tax Ct.1993), Atlantic County New School Inc. v. Pleasantville, 2 N.J.Tax 192 (Tax Ct.1981), and Blair Academy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • KENNETH FRANCO VS. FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY (L-5362-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 2021

    Michael Brown, one of Franco's closest friends, also attended the gathering. Brown confirmed with Franco that he was not planning on driving that night. Brown offered to have Franco stay overnight in his dorm room. … In response, Franco told Brown that he would be sleeping in S207.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reti v. Vaniska, Inc.

    14 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 1951

    In this State, however, when, as in this case, it is not claimed that any statute or ordinance was violated, the applicable test is that laid down in Barbanes v. Brown, 110 N.J.L. 6, 7 ( Sup. … Lomano v. Ideal Towel Supply Co., 25 N.J. Misc. 162 ( D.C. 1947); and see Curtis v. Jacobson, 54 A. 2 d 520 ( Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. 1947); Lustbader et al. v. Traders Delivery Co., 67 A. 2 d 237 ( Ct. App.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Mirinda v. King

    11 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 1951

    MacKenzie v. Trustees, &c., supra; Brown v. Condit, 70 N.J. Eq. 440 ( Ch. 1905); 3 Scott on Trusts, § 399 et seq.; 2 Bogert, Trusts & Trustees, 1287, c. 22; 2 Story, Eq. Jur., § 1169. … Brown v. Condit, supra . The foregoing quotations only exemplify the fundamental rule of law that infuses the manifest intention of the donor with predominant substantiality.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • LaPorta v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY BD.

    340 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 2001

    Super. 254 Joseph LAPORTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and County of Gloucester, Defendants-Appellants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 4, 2001. … N.J.R.E. 530; see Hannan v. St.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • FERIOZZI v. City of Atlantic City

    268 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1993

    Richmond v. Croson, supra , was decided shortly after the complaint was filed. The school board then repealed the program during the litigation and the case was dismissed as moot. … Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kinzig v. First Fidelity Bank, NA

    277 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 20, 1994

    Dynalectron Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 704 F.2d 737 (4th Cir.1983)]. In L.B. Smith, Inc. v. … See, Brown Strober Bldg. Supply Corp. v. Living House, 107 Misc. 2d 294 , 433 N.Y.S. 2d 724 (Dist.Ct. 1980). *260 Finally, plaintiff alleges that Dudley's own signature, constitutes a forged indorsement. Not so.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Asbury Park Press v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office

    374 N.J. Super. 312 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2004

    In Bowling v. … PRB Enterprises, Inc. v. South Brunswick Planning Board, 105 N.J. 1, 5 , 518 A.2d 1099, 1101 (1987); 1A Sutherland, Statutory Construction, supra, § 20:3 and § 20:12.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Primus v. Alfred Sanzari Enterprises

    363 N.J. Super. 538 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 2003

    See Brown v. Kennedy Memorial Hosp., 312 N.J.Super. 579, 596-597 , 711 A.2d 1370, 1378-79 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 426 , 719 A.2d 1024 (1998). … Department of Public Advocate v. N.J. Board of Public Utilities, 206 N.J.Super. 523, 528 , 503 A.2d 331, 333 (App.Div.1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ajamian v. Schlanger

    29 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 1953

    Estelle v. Board of Education, 26 N. J. Super. 9 (App. Div. 1953). … And in Schrage v. Liebstein, 16 N. J. Super. 384 (App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of the Commitment of M.G.B.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 2026

    Goldfarb v. Solimine, 460 N.J. Super. 22, 30 (App. Div. 2019), aff'd as modified and remanded on other grounds, 245 N.J. 326 (2021) (quoting State v. McCabe, 201 N.J. 34, 45 (2010)). … Panitch v. Panitch, 339 N.J. Super. 63, 66-67 (App. Div. 2001) (quoting Hundred E. Credit Corp. v. Eric Shuster Corp., 212 N.J. Super. 350, 358 (App. Div. 1986)) (emphasis added).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Aaron Mitchell v. Township of Willingboro

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 2026

    A-1496-24 AARON MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … State v. Chavies, 247 N.J. 245, 257 (2021) (quoting State v. R.Y., 242 N.J. 48, 65 (2020)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Borough of Berlin v. Remington & Vernick Engineers

    337 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2001

    The person executing the affidavit shall be licensed in this or any other state; have particular expertise in the general area or specialty involved in the action, as evidenced by board certification or by devotion of the … The person's expertise must be "evidenced by board certification or by devotion of the person's practice substantially to the general area or specialty involved in the action."

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • State v. Reynolds

    166 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1979

    Brown for defendant Louis James Rochelle. LANE, A.J.S.C. … United States v. Dionisio, supra, 410 U.S. at 17 , 93 S.Ct. *575 764. In State v. Porro, 152 N.J. Super. 179, 184 (App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DA Schulte, Inc. v. City of Jersey City

    7 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 1950

    The Division of Tax Appeals in fixing the total valuation of $747,800 affirmed the land valuation of $719,300 fixed by the County Board, but reduced the improvement valuation from $32,300 to $28,500. … Hillsborough Township v. Cromwell, 326 U.S. 620 , 90 L.Ed. 358 (1946); Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441 , 67 L.Ed. 340 (1923). The judgments are affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oram v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

    132 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1975

    See also, Kulas v. Public Service Elec, and Gas Co., 41 N. J. 311 (1964). … A. 48:17-11: They shall be located and constructed according to a plan showing the location, number and size of the poles, conduits and other fixtures to be approved by the governing body or board of freeholders before any

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.