Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.39s
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. A.O.F. (15-04-0224, WARREN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 2020
"[T]o qualify as fresh complaint, the victim's statements to someone she would ordinarily turn to for support must have been made within a reasonable time after the alleged assault and must have been spontaneous and voluntary … The record clearly established that defendant remained in his apartment until his arrest. Beth moved out in 2012, to live with J.W.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. P.Z. (FO-03-0090-19, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 22, 2020
The record establishes that defendant knowingly possessed an illegal firearm. … Crespo, 201 N.J. 207, 210 (2010) (holding PDVA constitutional because "the right to possess firearms clearly may be subject to reasonable limitations"); In re Winston, 438 N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedANDREW FLOCKHART VS. KAREN FLOCKHART (FM-19-0224-13, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 2019
After establishing the child support amount, the court addressed alimony. … Nevertheless, it used that hourly rate for a forty-hour week, fifty-two weeks per year, to establish her imputed income.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 2022
However, the record clearly demonstrates the Division provided repeated assistance to Teresa and directed her to several resources over a five-year period. … We are satisfied the Division established prong three by clear and convincing evidence. D.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SQUIRE FOSTER (17-01-0012, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 26, 2019
To qualify for the defense of voluntary intoxication, "the intoxication must be of an extremely high level." Ibid. … The court's failure to instruct the jury on this element was not, however, an error "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDOUGLAS MARTIN VS. BANK OF AMERICA (L-4030-08, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 2018
permitted to recover consumer fraud damages, even though they never received either the brochure or any oral representation from [the builder] concerning the windows, is clearly … Because I think then you're asking them to engage in an analysis that only an expert is qualified to do. . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LUIS A. VIALIZ (18-12-1582, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 25, 2022
Defendant, a frequent customer of the establishment, entered the store to purchase beer. … While the evidence arguably may establish that defendant believed A.S.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2021
N.J.R.E. 702 allows a qualified expert witness to testify "in the form of an opinion or otherwise." However, N.J.R.E. 703 requires that the expert give sufficient bases of their opinion. … We are convinced, however, that even if the judge erred by drawing that inference, the error was not an error "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedL.S. VS. M.S. (FM-14-0531-13, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 2019
A-1639-16T1 25 The child support guidelines provide in pertinent part that to qualify as a shared parenting arrangement, the parent of alternative residence must have at least … Regarding the financial circumstances of the parties, the judge noted that plaintiff "clearly had the capacity to work and earn substantial income, yet chose not to."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. ERIC MOORE(F-001008-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 2017
If the record meets this standard, this court will set aside an agency decision, which is clearly mistaken or erroneous. L.M. v. Div. of Med. … In contrast, the mass seizure of all electronics without regard to rightful proof of possession, on the hunch some of the items may qualify as contraband, is neither warranted nor sanctioned.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCollege Achieve Public Schools, Inc. v. State of New Jersey, Office of the State Comptroller
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 2026
The judge also rejected the argument CAPS "is neither a public agency, nor a private vendor of a public agency because N.J.S.A. 52:15C-14(d) does not explicitly list charter schools as" qualifying entities. … The OSC had "certified to the facts and information . . . necessary to . . . establish [its] reason for obtaining the documents it request[ed]."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLISA R. EASLEY VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (L-0094-13, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 2019
It found that "'[f]indings' by a public official are only admissible under the rule if they are statistical–a qualifier obviously inapplicable to an SSA disability determination." Id. at 318. … He said that he wasn't qualified, but he put him in that position ."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 2017
(codified as amended at N.J.S.A. 18A:36A-1 to -18), authorizes the establishment of charter schools in New Jersey. … It points out that while 11% to 16% of HoLa's population qualified for free or reduced-price lunch, Hoboken had much higher levels in some schools.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLOUISE HOCKMAN VS. BURRELLYS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (L-0365-14, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 2017
"[A] negligence cause of action requires the establishment of four elements: (1) a duty of care, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) actual and proximate causation, and (4) damages." … The jury was more likely to rely upon these statements because they were made by a person qualified as an expert.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ERIC KIM (16-06-0755, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 2019
The evidence at trial established that on April 17, 2016, E.R. (Erica) was robbed and V.A.E. (Val), who came to help Erica, was assaulted. … Here, defendant does not dispute that he qualified for an extended term.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2019
So there [i]s no mistake, what [the court] will tell the jury is [t]hat witnesses -- unless they [a]re qualified as experts, cannot express their opinions. … Without repeating the improper remark, the trial court clearly referenced J.B.'s comment that "he volunteered his opinion about the merits of a cause."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMITCHELL WILLIAMS VS. THE MLB NETWORK, INC. (L-3675-14, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 2019
The breach of contract claim brought by Williams against the Network was clearly viable. … It is well established that appellate review of a civil trial judge's evidentiary rulings is limited.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Jermaine T. Wharton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 4, 2025
The State Failed To Establish That The Ballistics Expert Properly Applied A Reliable Methodology. … Here, the principles and methodology are clearly sound. Next, we turn to defendant's Confrontation Clause challenge.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 10, 2022
Grelis reported the contamination to the DEP in November 2009, and Renaissance engaged a qualified site remediation contractor to remove the contaminated soil. … Grelis added, "[b]ut that's clearly not Renaissance's issue because they've only been involved with the property as a sub-lessee for a year-and-a-half, two years and never operated the dry cleaning."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedABDM PROPERTIES, LLC VS. BOHDAN O. MEUSZ(L-0272-16, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 2017
Unlike an individual seller, Fross is not immune from a CFA claim. See Mango v. Pierce-Coombs, 370 N.J. Super. 239, 254 (App. Div. 2004) (noting "a broker may be liable under the CFA"). … The complaint clearly alleges non-minor, material defects: "rotted and severely water damaged floor joists, joists with wood destroying insect damage, a lack of any footing for the inner walls of the foundation, and an
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna