Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.43s
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 2026
In considering the factors established in State v. … By example, the court questioned defendant after he qualified an answer with "if" he proceeded self-represented and admitted being unsure how he would advocate for himself.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedV.M. VS. S.G. (FV-12-2187-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2019
Because plaintiff asserted she had no dating or other qualifying relationship with defendant to obtain protection under the PDVA, she applied for and received a TPO. … Our review of the record establishes that the judge's findings of fact were fully supported by the record and are entitled to our deference.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDcpp v. R.S., in the Matter of A.A., C.A., and B.A.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2024
This is clearly, clearly excessive corporal punishment. … Moreover, the credible testimony in the record established that F.A.'
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn the Matter of the Commitment of L.J.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2025
Clear and convincing evidence "should produce in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to the truth of the allegations sought to be established." … A-3469-23 15 qualified expert witness to testify in the form on an opinion or otherwise. Dr. Sostre's qualifications as an expert were stipulated to at the hearing.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMark E. Solomon, D.P.M. v. Medical Executive Committee of Morristown Medical Center
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 2024
As such, courts have held the following to constitute fundamental fairness: notice of the charges or proposed action prior to a hearing, a fair and unbiased tribunal, a qualified right to counsel and right disclosure of … It is undisputed that plaintiff is governed by defendants' established procedures provided by its bylaws.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedALEXANDER ILIC v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 2022
contains substantial evidence to support the findings on which the agency based its action; and (3) whether in applying the legislative policies to the facts, the agency clearly … Bizzarro established the application was untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:16A-7(a)(1). We explained in Hayes v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FELIX RIVERA (17-05-0325, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 2020
The court noted that the State considered the biopsychosocial assessment of defendant but contended Alfonso was not qualified to render an opinion on juvenile waiver. … Defendant did not demonstrate that the prosecutor clearly and convincingly abused her discretion in considering the statutory factors.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 2019
Newark's charter schools are party to a "Compact" 4 agreeing to serve "all students in the city, especially the highest need students requiring special education services, students who are [ELL], students who qualify for … contains substantial evidence to support the findings on which the agency based its action; and (3) whether in applying the legislative policies to the facts, the agency clearly
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. IZAIA M. BULLOCK (19-02-0380, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 2021
Clearly it's a situation where anybody who was observing objectively . . . clearly [would] feel that they are not going anywhere. … Further, defendant's detention at police headquarters for several hours and the degree of intrusion upon his liberty clearly established a de facto arrest. See State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 6, 2022
It is well established that a related lesser offense must be charged to a criminal jury, even if it is not specifically requested by trial counsel, where that lesser offense is "clearly indicate[d]" by the proofs. … The Court further stated: A-2543-18 25 The statute qualifies what conduct is prohibited —
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 3, 2020
Defendants argue that the State's evidence only established that they were present at the scene of the assault. … Leeper has four qualifying adult convictions: three Superior Court convictions and a federal felony conviction. 9 Accordingly, the sentencing court was free to consider the two extra convictions for purposes of finding
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAMONT TAYLOR (18-09-0532 AND 18-10-0621, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 11, 2022
Plain error is an error "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2; Singleton, 211 N.J. at 182. … In determining whether the State's evidence established the elements of an offense, we apply the same standard as the trial court. State v. Cruz-Pena, 459 N.J. Super. 513, 520-21 (App.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 2022
The admission of the unchallenged evidence constitutes plain error if it was "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2. … Lima's lay opinion testimony was not "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAnne Stulpin v. Patrick J. Bastian
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 26, 2024
. . real estate taxes are all not sufficient to establish mortgagee in possession status." … A fact or facts sufficient to establish dominion and control under one set of circumstances may be insufficient to establish it under another.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished344 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 2001
She stated: * * * Clearly neither biological parent could provide for the child or suggest any other source of care for the newborn baby. … Parenting programs were established. The parents attended classes and seminars to educate them on parenting skills.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. LOUIS CICENIA (F-021199-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 2018
Assuming that plaintiff recorded his deed before Wells Fargo filed any mortgage that specifically identified the lien on Unit 2, he would qualify as a bona fide purchaser whose position … itself did not contain a sufficient legal description, Schedule A, attached to the mortgage when recorded, did refer to the deed, 7 A-2189-16T4 which clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 19, 2018
Jones did not intend to make an inter vivos transfer of the Account to defendant because the record "clearly establishe[d]" that Mrs. Jones retained her full interest in the Account. The judge noted that both Mrs. … Sciolla also states that Hutchison is qualified to serve as lead counsel in this case. He asserts Hutchison has special expertise in this "type of case" and defendant had asked him to represent her in this litigation.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDARYL B. WAINER VS. MIGUEL A. WAINER(FM-02-1405-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 13, 2017
Defendant presented no competent documentary evidence to establish the amounts were unreasonable, or unrelated to marital expenses. … There was no evidence suggesting that she would automatically qualify for a promotion or raise.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LAWRENCE CARTER, JR. (13-10-3174, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 2017
The court found, "based upon the fact that the ownership of the vehicle had not been established by the defendants . . . . … The certain persons not to have weapons offense was clearly a distinct offense from the other weapons charges, and it had distinct elements.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 13, 2021
Szymkowiak explained "a 8 Defendant did not object to Szymkowiak being qualified as an expert. … Defendant contends the improper admission of the Y-STR DNA expert testimony "was clearly capable of producing an unjust result."
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna