Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.08s

  • State v. Cale

    19 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1952

    Medical Examiners v. Giedroyc, 91 N.J.L. 61, 62 ( Sup. Ct. 1918)); it is an ordinary civil action ( Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 N.J.L. 54 ( Sup. … Neely v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lionshead Woods Corp. v. Kaplan Bros.

    243 N.J. Super. 678 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1990

    In Medici v. … Serv. v. Delran Tp. Adj. Bd., 236 N.J.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Center for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville

    19 N.J. Tax 193 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 5, 2000

    Accordingly, the complaint filed with the Tax Board was equally time barred. St. Michael’s Passionist Monastery v. Union City, 195 N.J.Super. 608, 611 , 481 A.2d 304 (App.Div.1984). … Cases cited by Belleville placing the onus for strict compliance with statutory time periods, Galloway *199 Tp. v. Petkeuis, 2 N.J. Tax 85 (1980), or excusing technical errors by the municipality, Wheaton v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kolczycki v. City of East Orange

    317 N.J. Super. 505 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1999

    The premises were boarded up in October. … In Douglas v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In Re Bonsanto's Application

    171 N.J. Super. 356 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1979

    R. 4:46-2; Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 74-75 (1954). … The responsibility to assure that only properly qualified persons are registered to vote is vested in the county board of elections. Cf. Carroll v. Cobb, 139 N.J. Super. 439, 448-449 (App.Div. 1976).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Driscoll v. Dept. of Treasury

    265 N.J. Super. 503 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 1993

    Thao v. Control Data Corp., 57 Wash. App. 802 , 790 P. 2d 1239 (1990). Accord Aguimatang v. California State Lottery, 234 Cal. App. 3d 769 , 286 Cal. Rptr. 57 (1991); Brown v. California State Lottery Comm'n, 232 Cal. … Brown, 284 Cal. Rptr. at 112 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Yellow Cab Corp. v. City Coun., Passaic

    124 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1973

    [Citation omitted]. [ Abelson's Inc. v. N.J. State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412, 420 (1950); Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kandle, supra.] … In Laba v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Schaffer Belts v. Division of Tax Appeals

    1 N.J. Super. 35 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1948

    In the absence of credible and convincing evidence contra, the presumption operates so as to validate the determination of the County Board of Taxation and the Division of Tax Appeals. Meltzer v. … Justice Heher, citing Jersey City v. Sun Holding Co., 134 N.J. Law 119 (Sup.Ct. 1946), 46 Atl. (2d) 156 ; Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood, 77 N.J. Law 141 (Sup.Ct. 1908), 71 Atl. 110 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • S.M., Etc. v. Board of Education of the Township of Monroe in the County of Middlesex

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 2026

    Plaintiff sued the Board, Robert Goodall, Anthony Gambino, and Daniel Lee ("Board defendants"), J.H. … Id. at 491 (alteration in the original) (quoting Benson v. Brown, 276 N.J. Super. 553, 565 (App. Div. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rolfe v. Borough of Emerson

    141 N.J. Super. 341 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1976

    ROLFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. THE BOROUGH OF EMERSON AND THE EMERSON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided April 27, 1976. *344 Mr. Geoffrey Lebar for plaintiffs ( Messrs. … Kremer v. Plainfield, 101 N.J. Super. 346 (Law Div. 1968). There is no reasonable basis at all on which the Board's denial can be justified.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH

    21 N.J. Super. 569 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1952

    Allas v. Rumson, 115 N.J.L. 593 ( E. & A. 1935); Milstrey v. Hackensack, 6 N.J. 400 (1951). … Allas v. Rumson, supra ; Florio *573 v. Jersey City, 101 N.J.L. 535 ( E. & A. 1925); Olesiewicz v. Camden, 100 N.J.L. 336 ( E. & A. 1924).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • D'AMICO v. Blanck

    85 N.J. Super. 297 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 2, 1964

    Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 35 N.J. 94, 116-117 (1961). … Laba v. Newark Board of Education, 23 N.J. 364, 382 (1957). In In re 17 Club, Inc., 26 N.J.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pollara v. POLICE. & FIRE. RETIRE. SYS. TRUSTEES

    183 N.J. Super. 505 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1982

    Super. 505 (1982) 444 A.2d 616 LOUIS POLLARA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. … Hillman v. Pub. Emp. Retire. Sys. Trustees, 109 N.J. Super. 449, 455 (App.Div. 1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BD., COM'RS, RIDGEFIELD PK. v. AS Pater Realty Co.

    73 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1962

    Jamouneau v. Local Government Board, 6 N.J. 281, 287 (1951)." See, in general, Antonelli Construction v. Milstead, 34 N.J. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949); and Sarner v. Union Tp., 55 N.J. Super. 523, 541-42, 543 ( Law Div. 1959).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Estate of Jack D'Avila by Tiago D'avila, Administrator Ad

    442 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 2015

    SIMPSON & BROWN, INC., Third-Party Defendant/ Fourth-Party Plaintiff- Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. … Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus. of S. Jersey, Inc., 103 N.J. 177, 183 (1986); McDaniel v. Man Wai Lee, 419 N.J. Super. 482, 489-90 (App. Div. 2011).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Masterson v. Christopher Diner, Inc.

    85 N.J. Super. 267 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 1964

    He also maintained that the case was controlled by Keystone Lunch, Inc. v. First Criminal Court of Newark, 22 N.J. Misc. 82 , 35 A. 2 d 472 ( Sup. Ct. 1944), and Zeltner v. Watson, 14 N.J. Super. 127 ( Law Div. 1951). … And see 8 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 d ed. 1957), § 25.72, p. 160 et seq.; Maplewood v. Tannenhaus, 64 N.J. Super. 80, 89 ( App. Div. 1960).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Harvey

    273 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1994

    To the extent that State v. … case the board did grant defendant credit.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Marjarum v. Township of Hamilton

    336 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 2000

    The Merit System Board adopted the ALJ's findings and recommendations. Plaintiff appealed. We reversed the Merit System Board's determination in an unreported opinion. Citing Grasso v. … Curtis v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID ORTMANN (L-1208-18, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 2020

    Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1, 11 (1972). In fact, "the doctrine necessarily assumes the branches will coordinate to the end that government will fulfill its mission." Ibid. … See Washington v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • PUB. HEALTH COUN. v. Franklin Tp. Bd. of Health

    108 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1970

    Super. 239 (1970) 260 A.2d 859 THE PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF HEALTH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … See also Edgeboro v. East Brunswick Tp., 31 N.J. Super, 238, 245, 246 ( Ch. Div. 1954); Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp., 120 N.J.L. 463, 468 ( Sup. Ct. 1938).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.