Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.39s
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 2013
In undertaking the statutory analysis, several well- established principles guide us. … In fact, under the current statutory timetable, the 67-day deadline for a citizens' petition under N.J.S.A. 19:37-1.1 clearly precedes the 65-day deadline for submission
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JEREMIAH E. MONELL (17-03-0270, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 2021
AT A FRYE HEARING; (2) CRAIN DID NOT FOLLOW ESTABLISHED QUALITY CONTROL PROTOCOLS FOR FRICTION RIDGE ANALYSIS; AND (3) CRAIN'S CONCLUSIONS WERE NOT QUALIFIED OR LIMITED IN … ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED STANDARDS.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSAMY BOUTROS, ETC. VS. CHRISTOPHER S. COOK (L-1913-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 2021
Plaintiff contends these rulings prevented him from establishing a prima facie negligence case against Smith- Sondy and Straight Edge. … The absence of striping created a "clearly recognizable known dangerous condition to exist."
Cited 0 timesUnpublished283 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1992
The facts here clearly show that defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in effects left in a home that he commandeered at gunpoint. … Sugar (II), 100 N.J. 214 , 495 A. 2d 90 (1984). [12] There, the Supreme Court established standards the state must meet in order to qualify for the exception.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState of New Jersey v. Anthony L. Gibson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 2025
Here, defendant was charged in count two under N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2(a), which concerns the commission of a qualifying unauthorized act. … D.A., 191 N.J. 158, 163 (2007), the evidence therefore sufficed to establish defendant's guilt of theft.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDcpp v. I.F., K.L., W.A., and L.S.-p., in the Matter of G.L. and A.A.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 24, 2024
Lanese was qualified as an expert in child abuse and neglect. She testified concerning her interview and examination of Gina and Aimee. … Lanese, a qualified expert, opined that Gina had been sexually abused.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedYvonne J. Terrell v. Penafranc A. Chitra
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 2026
Markbreiter was not qualified to offer an opinion regarding future medical expenses. … The right to subrogate against an insurance provider is established in N.J.A.C. 11:3-4.9(a).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished387 N.J. Super. 279 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 2006
Although not clearly disclosed by the record, we assume that the driving while intoxicated, resisting arrest and criminal mischief charges were then dismissed. … Thereafter, based upon the facts which have been established at a hearing, I will renew my order to show cause.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FRANCISCO MONTEROTORIVO (14-07-2351, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 2018
Indeed, his opinion was based on inadmissible hearsay information clearly obtained from others. … Conover's testimony constituted inadmissible expert testimony because he was not qualified as an expert witness at trial. See State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMario Quesada v. Compassion First Pet Hospitals
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2026
N.J.R.E. 702 provides that "[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge … The court barred the second photograph, reasoning, "I don't find that that establishes what you're saying it establishes."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Mark Lowery
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 21, 2025
Because out-of-state convictions of DWI laws that are "substantially similar" qualify as prior convictions for purposes of sentencing enhancement, 5 the directive reads in part: In the case of an out-of-state … Since N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a)(3) clearly requires that a "third or subsequent violation" compels a defendant to be "sentenced to imprisonment for a term of
Cited 0 timesUnpublished270 N.J. Super. 569 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1994
In a failure-to-warn case, however, a manufacturer enjoys no such immunity, and has a continuing duty to warn of dangers discovered even after a product leaves its control: [T]here is a different duty to warn of a danger … Unlike N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-3a(1) applicable to design defects, N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-4, applicable to warning defects, establishes no state-of-the-art defense limiting a manufacturer's liability to what it knew or should have known
Cited 15 timesPublishedJOY SPRIGGS v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD (L-2710-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 2022
He further explained that as mayor, he had "the sole prerogative under the charter to choose people that [he] believe[d] were best qualified to work with [him] and to help [him] . . . carry the city forward, and [plaintiff … a protected class; she was qualified to perform the work and had worked in the position of CMPD for fifteen years; she was not reappointed to the position
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDivision of Youth and Family Services v. MYJP
360 N.J. Super. 426 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 2003
Given this State's well-established commitment to protecting the welfare of children resident here, we now hold not only that S.J.A.' … s interests in this matter clearly qualify for due process protection.
Cited 41 timesPublishedVassiliu v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.
356 N.J. Super. 447 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 6, 2002
The heart of Judge Cook's reasoning was the conclusion, based upon our existing case law, that New Jersey's wrongful death act, N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 to -6, and survival act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-3, establish "two separate and distinct … In this respect, plaintiff asserts that her expert would not have been able to offer a viable "crashworthiness" opinion and clearly it was far too long past the discovery period for the carriers to obtain their own expert
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Vassiliu v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 178 N.J. 286 (2004)Cited 6 timesPublishedUS PIPE, ETC. v. United Steelworkers of Am.
59 N.J. Super. 240 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1960
The position taken is clearly unwarranted. … The pre-strike negotiations clearly appear to have been bona fide on both sides.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KESHAWN TUCKER (17-03-0700, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 2021
It was clearly that it was drug transactions that was occurring [on the video]." … Defendant has the burden of showing that this evidential error was "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 2022
The court concluded that DCPP had established each prong of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. … "Only when the trial court's conclusions are so 'clearly mistaken' or 'wide of the mark' should an appellate court intervene and make its own findings to ensure that there is not a denial of justice." N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLars M. Brown v. Elizabeth K. Byham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 2025
Div. 1993). 5 Qualified Domestic Relations Order. … Instead, she needs to produce evidence establishing that the children's maturation requires an increase in plaintiff's child support obligation.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn the Matter of the Civil Commitment of T.T., Svp-117-00
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 2025
Both experts were qualified in the subspecialty of risk assessment for SVPs. Each expert prepared a written report that the judge admitted into evidence. T.T. testified on his own behalf. … "The appropriate inquiry is to canvass the significant amount of expert testimony in the record and determine whether the lower court['s] findings were clearly erroneous." D.C., 146 N.J. at 58-59.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna