Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.00s
69 N.J. Super. 27 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1961
Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, supra ; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co., 301 U.S. 495 , 57 S.Ct. 868 , 81 L.Ed. 1245 (1937).
Modified by Switz v. Kingsley, 37 N.J. 566 (1962)Cited 7 timesPublished426 N.J. Super. 15 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 2012
Div.), certif. denied, 149 N.J. 141 , 693 A. 2d 110 (1997) (Lottery Commission license); *926 Bevacqua v. … It is axiomatic that the Parole Board's interpretation of the statute was entitled to some deference. See, e.g., Wnuck v. N.J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMarangi Bros., Inc. v. Bd. of Com'rs. of Ridgewood
33 N.J. Super. 294 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1954
Township of Dover v. Witt, supra ; Atlantic City v. Abbott, 73 N.J.L. 281 ( Sup. Ct. 1906). … City of Indianapolis v. Ryan, 212 Ind. 447 , 7 N.E. 2 d 974 ( Sup. Ct. 1937); Harper v. Richardson, supra . In Atlantic City v. Abbott, supra, 73 N.J.L. 281 ( Sup.
Cited 16 timesPublished164 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1978
Consequently, we shall proceed to review the matter as if brought before us by direct appeal from the State Parole Board. Cf. Johnson v. N.J. State Parole Bd., supra, 131 N.J. Super. at 520; State v. McNair, 131 N.J. … His contention is that the Parole Board had no jurisdiction to revoke his parole after the expiration of the "maximum sentence date." We disagree. His reliance on State v. Gibson, 156 N.J. Super. 516, 518 (App.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGreen Acres of Verona, Inc. v. Bor. of Verona
146 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1977
In our view, the determination of a local rent control board and of the governing body which reviews the board's decision should be based upon a transcribed record made before the board. … This process is analogous to that applied in variance applications before a board of adjustment. See Kramer v. Sea Girt Bd. of Adj., 45 N.J. 268, 289 (1965); Dolan v. DeCapua, 16 N.J. 599, 613 (1954).
Cited 9 timesPublishedHiggins v. American Soc. of Clinical Pathologists
94 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1967
(at p. 598) *257 In Greisman v. … Trautwein v. Harbourt, 40 N.J. Super. 247 ( App. Div. 1956), certification denied 22 N.J. 220 (1956); Schwankert v. N.J. State Patrolmen's, etc., Inc., 77 N.J. Super. 224, 229 ( Law Div. 1962); Carroll v.
Reversed on other grounds by Higgins v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists, 51 N.J. 191 (1968)Cited 6 timesPublishedPrivate Truck Council of Am., Inc. v. State
221 N.J. Super. 89 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1987
Brown & Connery and Kohn, Savett, Marion & Graf admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellants in A-1559-85T1 ( Merle A. Wolfson and Joseph M. Yohlin, of counsel; Steven G. Wolschina and David H. … Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 , 13 L.Ed 996 (1852), it has been clear that "the Commerce Clause was not merely an authorization to Congress to enact laws for the protection and encouragement of commerce among the States,
Cited 5 timesPublished385 N.J. Super. 188 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2006
Karins v. City of Atlantic City, 152 N.J. 582, 540 , 706 A.2d 706 (1998). An appellate court should undertake a “careful and principled consideration of the agency record and *195 findings.” Riverside Gen. Hosp. v. N.J. … Greenwood v. State Police Training Ctr., 127 N.J. 500, 513 , 606 A.2d 336 (1992); AC&C Dogs, LLC v. N.J.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPamela J. Graziadei v. Capital Health System, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 23, 2025
Santiago v. N.Y. & N.J. Port Auth., 429 N.J. Super. 150, 154-55 (App. Div. 2012) (citing Union Ink Co. v. AT&T Corp., 352 N.J. Super. 617, 627 (App. … See Henry v. N.J.
Cited 0 timesPublished123 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 22, 1973
FISCHER, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 27, 1973. … Lazar v. Board of Review, 77 N.J. Super. 251, 261 (App. Div. 1962).
Cited 16 timesPublishedBd. of Trustees v. BD. OF FREEHOLDERS, WARREN CO.
87 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 22, 1965
Super. 187 (1965) 208 A.2d 440 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, A PART OF THE DIVISION OF PENSIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … Restaino v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 16 N.J. Misc. 266 , 198 A. 765 ( Cir. Ct. 1938).
Cited 2 timesPublished408 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 2009
If the defendant is board certified, the expert must be similarly board-qualified. Ibid. … Renny is a board certified internist and gastroenterologist.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBasso v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.
90 N.J. Super. 150 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1966
Co. v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 431, 437 (1956). … Sweeney v. Board of Review, 43 N.J. 535 (1965); Mortensen v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 242, 246 (1956); Schoenwiesner v. Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, 44 N.J. Super. 377 ( App. Div. 1957).
Cited 14 timesPublished143 N.J. Super. 65 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1976
Super. 65 (1976) 362 A.2d 626 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. DIANE SINGLETON AND JAMES BROWN, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Argued June 11, 1976. Decided June 30, 1976. *66 Mr. … Balady for the defendant, James Brown. ( Mr. Terrence P. Corcoran, Deputy Public Defender.) JOELSON, A.J.S.C. This is a motion to dismiss an indictment.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEstate of Dolente v. Borough of Pine Hill
313 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1998
Thus, in Witt v. … Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Dept. of Transp., 116 N.J. 543, 561 , 562 A.2d 222 (1989).
Cited 4 timesPublishedPfenninger v. HUNTERDON CENTRAL REGIONAL HIGH SCH.
338 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1999
Finding the Board's role in the project to have been no more than a mere landowner, see e.g., Wolczak v. … See Sanna v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRosenberg v. Otis Elevator Co.
366 N.J. Super. 292 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 2004
According to Mason, replacement of the printed circuit board solved the problem as the circuit board drives the relay. Mason was unable to recall whether any circuit boards had previously failed. … LAW OF THE CASE In Myrlak v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHackensack Water Co. v. Tp. of North Bergen
8 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1950
The appellant relies on Hillsborough Township v. … Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp., 1 N.J. 417 (1949). In the present matter, the judgment of the county board was rendered November 13, 1947, and time to appeal to the Tax Division expired one month thereafter.
Cited 14 timesPublishedTrinity Cemetery Ass'n v. Township of Wall
325 N.J. Super. 292 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1999
[Cedar Park Cemetery v. Hayes, 132 N.J.Super. 572 , 334 A.2d 386 (Law Div.1975); Diocese of Metuchen v. Township of Piscataway, 252 N.J.Super. 525 , 600 A.2d 173 (Law Div.1991); Laurel Lawn v. … Plaza Joint Venture v. City of Atlantic City, 174 N.J.Super. 231, 238 , 416 A.2d 71 (App.Div.1980). “The approach to the state preemption issue parallels the federal analysis.” Garden State Farms, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRace v. Bd. of Education of Town of Newton
37 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1955
RACE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWTON, IN THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 10, 1955. … By reason of its parallel analogy this supposed defense was erased by the precedential decision in Murphy v. Zink, 136 N.J.L. 235 ( Sup.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna