Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.24s

  • Wilson v. Parisi

    268 N.J. Super. 213 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1993

    WILSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOMINIC PARISI AND THE ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 12, 1993. … Under Lehmann v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. Herman

    373 N.J. Super. 625 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 2004

    Suter v. … Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606, 629 , 731 A. 2d 14 (1999) (quoting Murray v. Brown, supra, 259 N.J.Super. at 365 , 613 A. 2d 502 .)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ajamian v. Tp. of No. Bergen

    103 N.J. Super. 61 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 30, 1968

    Board of Health of City of Yonkers, 140 N.Y. 1 , 35 N.E. 320 [ 23 L.R.A. 481 ]; Fire Dept. [of City of New York] v. Gilmour, 149 N.Y. 453, 459 , 44 N.E. 177 . … Ct. 1868); City of Newburgh v. Park Filling Station, supra ; Shedrick v. Board of Health of Consol. Dist., 204 Misc. 545 , 121 N.Y.S. 2 d 83 ( Sup. Ct. 1953). As said in City of Salem v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • KIRK C. NELSON VS. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-1377-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 2021

    Relying on Cohen v. … The Board further relies on Coyle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 170 N.J. 260 (2002), and Taylor v. Board of Education, 187 N.J. Super. 546 (App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Hotel and Restaurant Emp. and Bartend. International Union

    203 N.J. Super. 297 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1985

    The United States Supreme Court also recognized this interest in Brown v. … See Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union Local 54, 468 U.S. ___ , 104 S.Ct. 3179 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 373 (1984).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Marangi Bros., Inc. v. Bd. of Com'rs. of Ridgewood

    33 N.J. Super. 294 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1954

    Township of Dover v. Witt, supra ; Atlantic City v. Abbott, 73 N.J.L. 281 ( Sup. Ct. 1906). … City of Indianapolis v. Ryan, 212 Ind. 447 , 7 N.E. 2 d 974 ( Sup. Ct. 1937); Harper v. Richardson, supra . In Atlantic City v. Abbott, supra, 73 N.J.L. 281 ( Sup.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • DARLENE HYMAN v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIRMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 2022

    A-2494-19 DARLENE HYMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Alternatively, the ALJ relied on the holding in Kasper v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pfaus v. Feder

    88 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1965

    The single case cited for the second half of this statement is Smith v. Highway Board, 117 Vt. 343 , 91 A. 2 d 805 ( Sup. Ct. 1952). … And in Board of Governors of Fed. Reserve System v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Higgins v. American Soc. of Clinical Pathologists

    94 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1967

    (at p. 598) *257 In Greisman v. … Trautwein v. Harbourt, 40 N.J. Super. 247 ( App. Div. 1956), certification denied 22 N.J. 220 (1956); Schwankert v. N.J. State Patrolmen's, etc., Inc., 77 N.J. Super. 224, 229 ( Law Div. 1962); Carroll v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Higgins v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists, 51 N.J. 191 (1968)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kernbach v. Kernbach

    174 N.J. Super. 544 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 1980

    Defendant cited Reed v. … The assignment provides the board broad leeway to institute suit for the recovery of sums of assistance extended, the rights to which it has validly and in good faith been assigned. Bergen Cty. Welfare Bd. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Hatrak

    164 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1978

    Consequently, we shall proceed to review the matter as if brought before us by direct appeal from the State Parole Board. Cf. Johnson v. N.J. State Parole Bd., supra, 131 N.J. Super. at 520; State v. McNair, 131 N.J. … His contention is that the Parole Board had no jurisdiction to revoke his parole after the expiration of the "maximum sentence date." We disagree. His reliance on State v. Gibson, 156 N.J. Super. 516, 518 (App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pamela J. Graziadei v. Capital Health System, Inc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 23, 2025

    Santiago v. N.Y. & N.J. Port Auth., 429 N.J. Super. 150, 154-55 (App. Div. 2012) (citing Union Ink Co. v. AT&T Corp., 352 N.J. Super. 617, 627 (App. … See Henry v. N.J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunterdon County Democrat, Inc. v. Recorder Publishing Co.

    117 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1971

    Vickers v. Board of Com’rs, 77 Mont. 316 , 250 P. 606, 608 (Sup. Ct. 1926). … The most recent reported case is Schultz v. Board of Education Wanaque, 105 N. J. Super. 165 (App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Green Acres of Verona, Inc. v. Bor. of Verona

    146 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1977

    In our view, the determination of a local rent control board and of the governing body which reviews the board's decision should be based upon a transcribed record made before the board. … This process is analogous to that applied in variance applications before a board of adjustment. See Kramer v. Sea Girt Bd. of Adj., 45 N.J. 268, 289 (1965); Dolan v. DeCapua, 16 N.J. 599, 613 (1954).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Ed. Voc. Sch. in Sussex Cty. v. Voc.-Tech. Teachers Ed. Ass'n, Inc.

    170 N.J. Super. 426 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 26, 1979

    Super. 426 (1979) 406 A.2d 989 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL IN THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX, PLAINTIFF, v. SUSSEX COUNTY VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL TEACHERS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, INC., ROBERT D. … Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Camp, 124 N.J. Eq. 403, 411 (E. & A. 1938). See also Cooper v. Nutley Sun Printing Co., 36 N.J. 189, 198-99 (1961); American Assoc. Univ. Prof. v. Bloomfield College, 136 N.J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Auto-Rite Supply Co. v. MAYOR, WOODBRIDGE TP.

    41 N.J. Super. 303 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 1956

    Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150, 154 , 17 S.Ct. 255 , 41 L.Ed. 666 (1897); Washington National Ins. Co. v. Board of Review, etc., 1 N.J. 545, 554 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, supra ; Van Riper v. Parsons, 40 N.J.L. 1 ( Sup. Ct. 1878); Hart v. Teaneck Tp., 135 N.J.L. 174 ( E. & A. 1946).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. Berman

    259 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1992

    Drew Assocs. of NJ, LP v. Travisano, 122 N.J. 249, 258 , 584 A.2d 807 (1991); Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989). … In addition, as in Board of Dentistry, NJSBA properly challenged the tax and did not seek a stay pending judicial review. 84 N.J. at 585 , 423 A.2d 640 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Pilon v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CONT., PATERSON

    112 N.J. Super. 436 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1970

    Zinc Co. v. Board of Review, 25 N.J. 235, 239 (1957); In re Masiello, 25 N.J. 590, 600 (1958). … Benedetti v. Bd. of Com'rs, Trenton, 35 N.J. Super. 30, 33 (App. Div. 1955). In the case of the City of Paterson that responsibility was vested in respondent Board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • NEW JERSEY STATE HOTEL-MOTEL ASSN. v. Male

    105 N.J. Super. 174 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1969

    Super. 174 (1969) 251 A.2d 466 NEW JERSEY STATE HOTEL-MOTEL ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. RAYMOND F. … Cf Howell Tp. v. Division of Tax Appeals, 99 N.J. Super. 11 ( App. Div. 1968).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Matter of Cahill

    245 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1991

    The Merit System Board accepted the ALJ's findings of fact but rejected his conclusions and recommendations. The board found that dismissal was the appropriate action. … Whitlock v. Donovan, 598 F. Supp. 126, 134 (D.D.C. 1984), aff'd sub nom. Whitlock v. Brock, 790 F. 2d 964 (D.C. Cir.1986); Callicotte v. Carlucci, 698 F. Supp. 944, 949-50 (D.D.C. 1988).

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.