Case law

LAUREN URUSOW v. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2022

A-4210-19 LAUREN URUSOW, Appellant, v. … "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, courts are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J. 453, 459 (1982)).

Naseef v. Cord, Inc.

90 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1966

. *137 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Bernard I. Kramer argued the cause for petitioner. Mr. Charles Handler argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Samuel H. Berlin, of counsel and on the brief). … governing body of the municipality granting the same, after notice and hearing, whenever it shall appear that the person to whom the consent was granted has failed * * * to comply with any terms or conditions imposed by the board

Taylor v. Hoboken Bd. of Educ.

187 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1983

Taylor's appointment as counsel by the board has its origin in N.J.S.A. 18A:16-1, which empowers the board to employ "other officers and employees, as it shall determine...." Fox v. … Koribanics v. Board of Education of City of Clifton, 48 N.J. 1 , 5 (1966); Brennan v. Byrne, 31 N.J. 333, 337 (1960); Barringer v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139 (1951); Ackley v.

JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

451 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 2017

Datla, a board-certified nephrologist. … Id. at 291 (citing Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc., 63 N.J. 130, 145 (1973)); Brown v. N.J. Coll. of Med. & Dentistry, 167 N.J. Super. 532, 535 (Law Div. 1979).

Rooney v. West Orange Tp.

200 N.J. Super. 201 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1985

Super. 201 (1985) 491 A.2d 23 JOHN ROONEY, PLAINTIFF, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WEST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND WILLIAM CECERE, DEFENDANT. … Co. v. Farmers Ins.

Bzozowski v. Penn.-Reading Seashore Lines

107 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1969

The United States Supreme Court, in Jencks v. … Lakewood Trust Co. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co., 81 N.J. Super. 329 ( Law Div. 1963). Further, in Guarriello v. Benson, 90 N.J.

Tomei v. Ins. Co. of North America

194 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1984

In McKenna v. … Amiano v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 85 N.J. 85, 90 (1981).

Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Bd.

406 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2009

In sum, because of Roberts's participation at the December Board hearing, the Board proceedings in their entirety must be voided and set aside. See Haggerty v. … See Kruvant v.

Felici v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

83 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 1964

The rear area of several apartment units extends from Browning Road north along the westerly railroad tracks to Wayne Terrace (West), a street which runs parallel to Browning Road and dead-ends near the bed of the railroad … Co. v. Ewan, 55 N.J.L. 574 ( E. & A. 1893); Schwanewede v. North Hudson Ry. Co., 67 N.J.L. 449 ( Sup. Ct. 1902); cf. Pangborn v. Central Railroad Co. of N.J., 18 N.J. 84 (1955).

Miller v. Boonton Tp. Bd. of Adjustment

67 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1961

LEROY MILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BOONTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND DIXON ASSOCIATES, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … Smith v. Madison Zoning Board of Adjustment, 59 N.J. Super. 553, 558-559 ( App. Div. 1960), certification denied Smith v. Kirkpatrick, 32 N.J. 352 (1960).

In the Matter of Board of Fire Commissioners, Fire

443 N.J. Super. 158 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 2015

Citing City of Jersey City v. … Grasso v. W. N.Y. Bd. of Educ., 364 N.J. Super. 109, 118 (App. Div. 2003) (citing Abramson v.

Nynex Mob. Comm. Co. v. Hazlet Tp.

276 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1994

Board of Adjustment, 249 N.J. Super. 568, 578 , 592 A. 2d 1236 (App.Div. 1991) (citing Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965)). The decision of a board is presumptively valid. … In Yahnel v. Board of Adjustment, 79 N.J.

Lippman v. Ethicon, Inc.

432 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 4, 2013

Relying in part on this court’s decision in Massarano v. … Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, 214 N.J. 518, 554-56 , 70 A.3d 602 (2013) (citing Dzwonar v. McDevitt, 177 N.J. 451, 461-62 , 828 A.2d 893 (2003)).

Switz v. Middletown Tp.

40 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1956

Raison v. Board of Education, supra ; Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of Guttenberg, supra, 66 N.J.L., at page 669 ; State ex rel. Heimov v. Thomson, 131 Conn. 8 , 37 A. 2 d 689 ( Sup. Ct. Err. 1944); State v. … State v. Gavin, 136 N.J.L. 47, 50 ( Sup. Ct. 1947); State v. Cottrell, 117 N.J.L. 226, 229 ( E. & A. 1936); Beattie v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 96 N.J.L. 72, 74 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); Byer v.

FIRST NAT. STATE BANK v. Kron

190 N.J. Super. 510 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1983

In Seyfert v. … Further, in Journeay v. Brown, 26 N.J.L. 111, 120 (Sup.Ct. 1856), our former Supreme Court stated ...

Griggs v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Princeton

75 N.J. Super. 438 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1962

Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94 , 105 *444 (1957). See also Schmidt v. … This alone did not necessarily make the board's decision unsustainable. As was noted in Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Nucera, 59 N.J. Super. 189, 201 ( App.

Gilborges v. Wallace

153 N.J. Super. 121 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 22, 1977

but by Linda's father; the fact that the Board received no pecuniary benefit from her actions, see *134 Kligman v. … See DePolo v. *139 Caplan, 119 N.J. Super. 56 (App. Div. 1972). However, it was the Board's counsel who requested the charge and any error which may have existed may not now be availed of by the Board. Schult v. H. & C.

Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries

278 N.J. Super. 129 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 1994

Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 580 , 432 A. 2d 493 (1981); Perry v. Levy, 87 N.J.L. 670, 672 , 94 A. 569 (E. & A. 1915); Molino v. B.F. Goodrich Co., 261 N.J. … See Brown v. Brown, supra, 86 N.J. at 581 , 432 A. 2d 493 . Thus, evidence of subsequent remedial action has been admitted to show control over the injuring instrumentality, Perry v.

Kinderkamack Road Associates, LLC v. Mayor of Oradell

421 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 2011

The Board further agrees with Burgis’[s] testimony that this furthers the goals of the Master Plan of enhancing buffers and separating incompatible uses. (v) The Board also finds Mr. … The Board recognizes that while this type of reconciliation is not explicitly mentioned in [Medici v.

In Re Shack

177 N.J. Super. 358 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1981

Shack testified, and all of the violation determinations in the Board's letter were reviewed and challenged. As was observed in Goldberg v. … Malady v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Emp. Security, 166 N.J. Super. 523, 530 (App.Div. 1979). See also, Horsman Dolls v.