Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.99s
In Re Ownership of Renewable Energy Certificates
389 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 2007
FERC v. Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742, 745-46 , 102 S.Ct. 2126 , 72 L.Ed. 2d 532, 538 (1982). … FERC v. Mississippi, supra, 456 U.S. at 750 , 102 S.Ct. at 2132 , 72 L.Ed. 2d at 541 n. 11 (citing 16 U.S.C.A. § 796 (18)(A)).
Cited 6 timesPublished255 N.J. Super. 514 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 1992
In State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 594 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979), our Supreme Court held that in cases of this nature "a meticulous and objective analysis of the evidence is imperative." … The Court distinguished the facts in Brown from the facts in State v. Sapp, 71 N.J. 476 , 366 A. 2d 334 (1976), rev'g on dissenting opinion below, 144 N.J.
Cited 17 timesPublishedCervase v. Kawaida Towers, Inc.
124 N.J. Super. 547 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1973
Brown, Vogelman & Ashley, attorneys). Mr. Richard W. Vail, Deputy Attorney General of New Jersey, for defendant Lawrence F. … In Hunt v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRestivo v. Church of Saint Joseph of Palisades
306 N.J. Super. 456 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1997
We are convinced Brown v. St. … Brown v. St.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCarlos E. Mendez v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2026
The Board determined Mendez did not leave employment "in a huff" as did the claimant in Savastano v. Board of Review, 99 N.J. Super. 397 (1968). … "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, courts are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J. 453, 459 (1982)); see also McClain v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedShawn P. Flannery v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 2026
FLANNERY, Appellant, v. … Mullarney v. Bd. of Rev., 343 N.J. Super. 401, 410 (App. Div. 2001). On remand, the Board shall determine whether Flannery is entitled to a waiver of recovery.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJack Laurie v. Board of Trustees, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 18, 2025
A-3128-23 JACK LAURIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … See, e.g., Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys, 206 N.J. 14, 27 (2011).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedStrauss v. Township of Holmdel
312 N.J. Super. 610 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 18, 1997
Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989); See also, Barone v. Dep’t of Human Services, 107 N.J. 355, 368 , 526 A.2d 1055 (1987). … Planning boards are independent administrative bodies which act in a quasi-judicial manner. Dallmeyer v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStacie Dechert v. Totowa Board of Education
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2026
Samolyk v. Berthe, 251 N.J. 73, 78 (2022) (citing Woytas v. Greenwood Tree Experts, Inc., 237 N.J. 501, 511 (2019)). … Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad, 225 N.J. 373, 394 (2016) (quoting Bergen Com. Bank v. Sisler, 157 N.J. 188, 208 (1999)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedShannon P. Johnson v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 2026
JOHNSON, Appellant, v. … We do not review Tribunal decisions that have not been adopted by the Board. See, e.g., Heulitt v. Bd. of Rev., 300 N.J. Super. 407, 411-12 (App.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIlvin F. Toribio v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 2026
TORIBIO, Appellant, v. … The Board contends the redetermination complied with N.J.A.C. 12:17- 3.3(b).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKimberly Leftwich v. Board of Trustees, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 2026
A-2143-24 KIMBERLY LEFTWICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … See Leftwich v. Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., No. A-1023-22 (App. Div. Mar. 20, 2024).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished371 N.J. Super. 77 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 2004
Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 271 , 91 S.Ct. 621, 625 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 35 (1971) (candidate for the United States Senate), but also candidates for public office on a local level, see Brown v. … Brown, 751 P.2d 939, 941 (Alaska 1988) (doctor seeking appointing to medical board), and union office, see Materia v. Huff, 394 Mass. 328 , 475 N.E. 2d 1212, 1215 (1985).
Cited 16 timesPublishedMarcia Harris v. Newark Board of Education
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 2026
Cutler v. … Romano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 284 N.J. Super. 543, 548-49 (App. Div. 1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJuan M. Garabito v. Board of Trustees
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 2026
GARABITO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … See H.K. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDavid Dombrowski v. Board of Trustees, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 2, 2026
A-0292-24 DAVID DOMBROWSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … Co. v. Bureau of Sec., 64 N.J. 85, 92-93 (1973) (quoting Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 599 (1965)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedReilly v. Weber Engineering Co., Inc.
107 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1969
See Miller v. Bill Miller's Riviera, Inc., 21 N.J. Super. 112, 116 ( App. Div. 1952); Schultz v. Henry V. Vaughans Sons & Co., 24 N.J. Super. 492, 498 ( Cty. Ct. 1953). In Belyus v. … See Green v. DeFuria, supra, 19 N.J., at 300, and 1 Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law, §§ 28.10, 28.11 (1966). See also, O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951).
Cited 5 timesPublishedStein & Kurland, P. C. v. Board of Review of the Department of Labor & Industry
181 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 2, 1981
Recognizing the purpose of the Unemployment Compensation Law is to alleviate the impact of involuntary unemployment, Sweeney v. … Under all the circumstances we will not disturb the Board of Review’s award of a $500 counsel fee. Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J.Super. 46, 54 (App.Div. 1964).
Cited 2 timesPublishedGuild of Prescription Opticians of New Jersey, Inc. v. State Board of Examiners
106 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1969
The petition challenges the validity of administrative Rule 37 adopted by respondent, State Board of Examiners of Ophthalmic Dispensers and Ophthalmic Technicians, a State administrative agency created under the act regulating … Pringle v. N. J. Dept. of Civil Service, 45 N. J. 329 (1965). A declaratory judgment will be entered upholding the validity of Rule 37.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIdeeria Lawrence v. Board of Trustees, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 2026
In Mount v. … Lawrence's contention that her case is similar to Richardson and Moran v. Board of Trustees, PFRS, 438 N.J. Super. 346 (App. Div. 2014), is not convincing.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna