Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • A.M. v. Millville Board of Education

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 2025

    R. 1:38-3(d)(9). 2 Lopez v. … The judge also found the Board suffered substantial prejudice due to the passage of time, including the unavailability of key witnesses and the difficulty in mounting a defense to decades-old allegations. 3 R.L. v

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Marcus A. Brown

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 2026

    A-0616-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARCUS A. BROWN, a/k/a ANTUAAN WILLIAMS and ANTUANE J. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. McCoy

    261 N.J. Super. 202 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1992

    In State v. … Therefore, the appropriate remedy is not suppression of the statement but review by a disciplinary board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • NJ State Bd. of Architects v. Armstrong

    89 N.J. Super. 358 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 1, 1965

    Super. 358 (1965) 215 A.2d 51 NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EARL ARMSTRONG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 15, 1965. … Robson v. Rodriquez, 26 N.J. 517, 528 (1958); La Polla v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 71 N.J. Super. 264, 275 ( Law Div. 1961).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Christopher Silva v. Local Finance Board

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 2026

    A-0590-24 CHRISTOPHER SILVA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Redd v. Bowman, 223 N.J. 87, 104 (2015) (quoting Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Mitchell, 422 N.J. Super. 214, 221-22 (App. Div. 2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Yahmir Y. Brown

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 2026

    BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted February 3, 2026 – Decided February 27, 2026 Before Judges Gilson and Vinci. … Effective January 21, 2020, the Victims of Crime Compensation Board became known as the VCCO.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • K.P. v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 2025

    A-1952-23 K.P.,1 Petitioner-Appellant, v. … v. N.J. Motor Vehicle Comm'n, 234 N.J. 150, 157 (2018)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Downey v. Bd. of Education of Jersey City

    74 N.J. Super. 548 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1962

    Botkin v. … Div. 1958), appeal dismissed 28 N.J. 218 (1958), and *552 Monte v. Milat, 17 N.J. Super. 260 ( Law Div. 1952). [1] See also Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189 (1962); Tumulty v. Jersey City, 57 N.J. Super. 503 ( App.

    Limited by Georgia v. Suruda, 154 N.J. Super. 439 (1977)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Stephanie Platia v. Board of Education of the Township of Hamilton, Mercer County

    434 N.J. Super. 382 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 2014

    Spiewak v. Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. 63, 72 (1982). … also Kletzkin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stalford v. Barkalow

    31 N.J. Super. 193 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1954

    . * * *" See Concord Garden Apartments v. Board of Adjustment of City of Englewood, 1 N.J. Super. 301 ( App. Div. 1949). … Krevolin & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 20 N.J. Super. 85 ( App. Div. 1952).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Plan for Abolition of Council

    424 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2012

    General Assembly v. Byrne, 90 N.J. 376, 382 [ 448 A. 2d 438 ] (1982); Knight v. Margate, [ 86 N.J. 374, 388 , 431 A. 2d 833 (1981)]; Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1, 11 [ 297 A. 2d 572 ] (1972). … That Act's constitutionality was upheld in Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jasmil Rivas v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 28, 2025

    A-1423-23 JASMIL RIVAS, Appellant, v. … The Board cited to Wojcik v Board of Review, 58 N.J. 341, 344 (1971), where the Supreme Court held that an individual must show medical proof that their health condition was attributable to or aggravated by their work.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Timothy Cook v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 2026

    A-3102-23 TIMOTHY COOK, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WILLIAM R. … See Ardan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • J.W. v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 12, 2026

    A-0249-24 J.W.,1 Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Wayne Brown argued the cause for appellant (Alterman & Associates, LLC, attorneys; Stuart J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Donna Cobianchi v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 2025

    A-0526-24 DONNA COBIANCHI, Appellant, v. … See generally Alfonso v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • James Gluck v. Board of Trustees

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 24, 2025

    V. … Berg v. Christie, 225 N.J. 245, 280 (2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Baer v. Sorbello

    177 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1981

    Alan Silber argued the cause for respondents ( Alan Silber and Brown & Brown, attorneys; H. Richard Chattman, on the brief). Jeffrey E. … Simmell v. N.J. Coop Co., 28 N.J. 1, 9 (1958).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Kim

    403 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 2008

    Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A. 2d 1 (1999).] … Maglies v. Estate of Guy, 193 N.J. 108, 123 , 936 A. 2d 414 (2007); Schierstead v. Brigantine, 29 N.J. 220, 231 , 148 A. 2d 591 (1959).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Township of Edison Zoning Board of Adjustment

    300 N.J. Super. 456 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 1997

    Compare, Mocco v. … See also Yahnel v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Florham Park Inv. Assocs. v. Madison Planning Bd.

    92 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 14, 1966

    Nolan v. Fitzpatrick, 9 N.J. 477, 484 (1952); Deaney v. Linen Thread Co., 19 N.J. 578, 581 (1955); Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189, 202 (1962). II We therefore come to a consideration on the merits. … The determination of the planning board should be sustained, unless it is unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious. Rexon v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Haddonfield, 10 N.J. 1 (1952); Schmidt v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.