Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
4.01s
GOODSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2023
Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973); see Leamer v. … However, in Barry v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFederal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.
10 F. Supp. 3d 602 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 7, 2014
See Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 139 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 (emphasis added); see also Massachusetts v. … FTC v.
Cited 37 timesPublishedZANGARA v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 21, 2023
Defendant, the National Board of Medical Examiners (“NBME”), opposes both reconsideration and transfer. (ECF No. 48.) … See Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 108 (3d Cir. 2002) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownL.W. v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 8, 2024
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F. App'x 174, 185 (3d Cir. 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCLASEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
District Court, D. New Jersey · May 21, 2024
Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh, 824 F.3d 353, 360 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210-11 (3d. Cir. 2009)). 4. … Spruill v. Davis, 372 F.3d 218, 235-36 (3d Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownELIZABETH CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. M.G.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 22, 2023
Counsel for Plaintiff LETTER OPINION FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT Re: Elizabeth City Board … of Education v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJOHNSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 6, 2024
Plaintiff names the New Jersey State Parole Board; Parole Board members Samuel J. … Schreane v. Seana, 506 F. App’x 120, 122 (3d Cir. 2012); Courteau v. United States, 287 F. App’x 159, 162 (3d Cir. 2008); Mitchell v. Dodrill, 696 F. Supp. 2d 454, 471 (M.D. Pa. 2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGuralnick v. Supreme Court of New Jersey
747 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 1990
In Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 351 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), the Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act was not “intended to restrain state action or official action directed by a state.” … Accordingly, this court finds sufficient state “supervision” to hold that the state exemption to the federal antitrust laws enunciated in Parker v. Brown applies.
Cited 13 timesPublishedS.K. v. BERNARDS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 29, 2024
Ill. 2009) (citing Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P., 62 F.3d 520, 534 (3d Cir. 1995)); c.f. Damarcus S. v. D.C., 190 F. … “[I]n determining whether an IEP was appropriate, the focus should be on the IEP actually offered and not on one that the school board could have provided if it had been so inclined.” Lascari v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Gotham Fuel Corp.
860 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 27, 1993
See Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.— Pension Fund v. Able Truck Rental Corp., et al., 822 F.Supp. 1091 (D.N.J.1993). … See, e.g., Retirement Fund Trust of Plumbing v. Franchise Tax Board, 909 F.2d 1266, 1274 (9th Cir.1990) (“state law of general application with only a ‘tenuous’ effect on an ERISA plan is not [preempted].”); Rebaldo v.
Cited 9 timesPublished779 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 9, 1992
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; Brown v. Hilton, 492 F.Supp. 771, 774 (D.N.J.1980). The burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists rests initially on the moving party. Goodman v. … NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982) (emphasis in original).
Cited 13 timesPublishedDOE v. VINELAND CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 17, 2024
of Education v. … L.A. v. River Vale Board of Education, No. 11–3801, 2013 WL 5305230 (D.N.J. Sept. 18, 2013), is instructive.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWOODSON v. ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 27, 2023
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986). … Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F. App’x. 174, 185 (3d Cir. 2008) (quoting Gary v. Braddock Cemetery, 517 F.3d 195, 201 n. 6 (3d Cir. 2008)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownWOMBLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · May 6, 2024
Similarly, in Figueroa v. … .”); see also Hamilton v. Roth, 624 F.2d 1204, 1210–12 (3d Cir. 1980). V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLAWSON v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 23, 2023
3 See, e.g., Brown v. … No. 23- 644); Lawson v. Cumberland County Board of Chosen Freeholders, Civ.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHOWARD v. CINNAMINSON TWP. BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 5, 2023
v. Dennis Township Board of Education, 1998 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 346, *14-15. This interpretation of the IDEA is consistent with the statutory language. … Further, the Court notes that the Third Circuit clarified in G.W. v. Ringwood Board of Education, 28 F.4th 465 (3d.
Cited 0 timesUnknownR.B.A v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 26, 2023
Legear v. … See Bell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownZANGARA v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 6, 2023
Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners (“Defendant” or “NBME”) filed its Memorandum of Law in Opposition (Opp., ECF No. 25), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (Reply, ECF No. 26). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHirsch v. SYSTEM COUNCIL U-2, IBEW, AFL-CIO
541 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 1982
E.g., Brown Transport Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 334 F.2d 30, 36 (5th Cir. 1964). Therefore, the Respondents’ argument that their actions must be permitted because of the presence of permissible objects is unavailing. 8. … B. v. Int. Brotherhood of Elec.
Cited 2 timesPublishedC.W. v. NEW PROVIDENCE BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 27, 2023
In Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. … (Reply at 9 (citing M.R. v. Ridley Sch. Dist., 868 F.3d 218 (3d Cit. 2017).) Not only is the Board’s reliance on M.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna