Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

4.01s

  • GOODSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2023

    Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973); see Leamer v. … However, in Barry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.

    10 F. Supp. 3d 602 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 7, 2014

    See Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 139 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 (emphasis added); see also Massachusetts v. … FTC v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • ZANGARA v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 21, 2023

    Defendant, the National Board of Medical Examiners (“NBME”), opposes both reconsideration and transfer. (ECF No. 48.) … See Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 108 (3d Cir. 2002) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • L.W. v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 8, 2024

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F. App'x 174, 185 (3d Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CLASEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 21, 2024

    Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh, 824 F.3d 353, 360 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210-11 (3d. Cir. 2009)). 4. … Spruill v. Davis, 372 F.3d 218, 235-36 (3d Cir. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ELIZABETH CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. M.G.

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 22, 2023

    Counsel for Plaintiff LETTER OPINION FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT Re: Elizabeth City Board … of Education v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • JOHNSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 6, 2024

    Plaintiff names the New Jersey State Parole Board; Parole Board members Samuel J. … Schreane v. Seana, 506 F. App’x 120, 122 (3d Cir. 2012); Courteau v. United States, 287 F. App’x 159, 162 (3d Cir. 2008); Mitchell v. Dodrill, 696 F. Supp. 2d 454, 471 (M.D. Pa. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guralnick v. Supreme Court of New Jersey

    747 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 1990

    In Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 351 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), the Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act was not “intended to restrain state action or official action directed by a state.” … Accordingly, this court finds sufficient state “supervision” to hold that the state exemption to the federal antitrust laws enunciated in Parker v. Brown applies.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • S.K. v. BERNARDS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 29, 2024

    Ill. 2009) (citing Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P., 62 F.3d 520, 534 (3d Cir. 1995)); c.f. Damarcus S. v. D.C., 190 F. … “[I]n determining whether an IEP was appropriate, the focus should be on the IEP actually offered and not on one that the school board could have provided if it had been so inclined.” Lascari v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Gotham Fuel Corp.

    860 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 27, 1993

    See Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.— Pension Fund v. Able Truck Rental Corp., et al., 822 F.Supp. 1091 (D.N.J.1993). … See, e.g., Retirement Fund Trust of Plumbing v. Franchise Tax Board, 909 F.2d 1266, 1274 (9th Cir.1990) (“state law of general application with only a ‘tenuous’ effect on an ERISA plan is not [preempted].”); Rebaldo v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Local 397, International Union of Electronic, Electrical Salaried MacHine & Furniture Workers v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.

    779 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 9, 1992

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; Brown v. Hilton, 492 F.Supp. 771, 774 (D.N.J.1980). The burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists rests initially on the moving party. Goodman v. … NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982) (emphasis in original).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • DOE v. VINELAND CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 17, 2024

    of Education v. … L.A. v. River Vale Board of Education, No. 11–3801, 2013 WL 5305230 (D.N.J. Sept. 18, 2013), is instructive.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WOODSON v. ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 27, 2023

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986). … Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F. App’x. 174, 185 (3d Cir. 2008) (quoting Gary v. Braddock Cemetery, 517 F.3d 195, 201 n. 6 (3d Cir. 2008)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WOMBLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 6, 2024

    Similarly, in Figueroa v. … .”); see also Hamilton v. Roth, 624 F.2d 1204, 1210–12 (3d Cir. 1980). V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LAWSON v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 23, 2023

    3 See, e.g., Brown v. … No. 23- 644); Lawson v. Cumberland County Board of Chosen Freeholders, Civ.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HOWARD v. CINNAMINSON TWP. BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 5, 2023

    v. Dennis Township Board of Education, 1998 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 346, *14-15. This interpretation of the IDEA is consistent with the statutory language. … Further, the Court notes that the Third Circuit clarified in G.W. v. Ringwood Board of Education, 28 F.4th 465 (3d.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • R.B.A v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 26, 2023

    Legear v. … See Bell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ZANGARA v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 6, 2023

    Defendant National Board of Medical Examiners (“Defendant” or “NBME”) filed its Memorandum of Law in Opposition (Opp., ECF No. 25), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (Reply, ECF No. 26). … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hirsch v. SYSTEM COUNCIL U-2, IBEW, AFL-CIO

    541 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 1982

    E.g., Brown Transport Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 334 F.2d 30, 36 (5th Cir. 1964). Therefore, the Respondents’ argument that their actions must be permitted because of the presence of permissible objects is unavailing. 8. … B. v. Int. Brotherhood of Elec.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • C.W. v. NEW PROVIDENCE BOARD OF EDUCATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 27, 2023

    In Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. … (Reply at 9 (citing M.R. v. Ridley Sch. Dist., 868 F.3d 218 (3d Cit. 2017).) Not only is the Board’s reliance on M.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.