Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,333 results
1.42s
INGANDELA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 18, 2022
The Act establishes a five-step sequential process for evaluation by the ALJ to determine whether an individual is disabled. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520. … That generalized response is not enough to require a remand, particularly when the administrative record indicates clearly that the ALJ relied on the voluminous medical evidence as a basis
Cited 0 timesUnknownMYERS v. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES CORP.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 30, 2025
As to what qualifies as a religious belief, the Third Circuit has adopted the following definition of religion: First, a religion addresses fundamental and ultimate questions having to do … Accordingly, at this stage, the Court cannot conclude that the decision to deny Plaintiff a religious exemption “clearly and unambiguously violate[d]” Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Jd.
Cited 0 timesUnknown449 F. Supp. 1057 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 2, 1977
That fact alone clearly demonstrates that Silver did not provide the government with exculpatory evidence. … Sutton’s knowledge of this fact might qualify it as impeachment, particularly when other facts in the case are considered. On the other hand, who would have wanted to use it?
Cited 3 timesPublishedRIBAUDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 28, 2020
establish that Plaintiff’s former counsel actually submitted Dr. … An impairment that manifests only some of those criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify.’” Jones, 364 F.3d at 504 (quoting Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521, 530 (1990)) (emphasis in original).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMORALES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 27, 2019
Under this definition, a Plaintiff qualifies as disabled only if his physical or mental impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to perform his past relevant … The ALJ did not accurately weigh the relevant and probative evidence in making the RFC determination and then use that properly established RFC to determine whether jobs exist in
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2026
In addition, notice of the settlement must be the best that is “practicable under the circumstances,” and “clearly and concisely state in plain, casily understood language.” Fed. R. Civ. P, 23(c)(2). … Class Counsel are very familiar with the applicable legal issues and are qualified to represent the Class. Regarding the second prong, there is no conflict of interest between the named parties and the Class.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 2024
A prima facie case of national origin or race discrimination requires a plaintiff to establish that: “(1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she was qualified for her position; (3) she suffered an adverse employment … qualified for his employment as he was a skilled salesman (ECF No. 99-1 ¶¶ 28, 37, 46–47.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownJ.A. v. MONROE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 29, 2024
Judge Hillman held in a pair of decisions that individual administrative law judges were entitled to judicial immunity and dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against them with prejudice. Joanna A. v. Monroe Twp. … At the same time, plaintiffs have not established that the Board’s document dump in the Consolidated Cases or refusal to meet their imposed deadline in DP 3 represented violations.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGADDY v. THE LONG & FOSTER COMPANIES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 10, 2023
Plaintiff argues that unauthorized charges are “actual misuse” of PII, which qualify as concrete injuries. Id. at 8. … Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992), the complaint must still “clearly and specifically set forth facts sufficient to satisfy” Article III. Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 155 (1990). A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 25, 2022
the psychological records and reports would be kept strictly confidential, and would not be disclosed to the City of Trenton personnel[,]” the court in Caver found that the defendant “clearly … Nonetheless, the Court need not determine at this time whether fitness for duty reports categorically do not qualify for protection by the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 7, 2023
“To establish a failure-to-accommodate claim under the LAD, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she ‘(1) qualifies as an individual with a disability, or [ ] is perceived as having a disability, as that has been defined … I conclude that the section of the CMMC employee handbook cited above, in conjunction with the signed receipt of handbook form, clearly and effectively disclaimed any contractual rights arising from the handbook.
Cited 0 timesUnknownROBINSON v. SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 28, 2019
little [sic] while and was clearly contemplated while we were giving guidance on our last earnings call.” … The PSLRA's Safe Harbor provision, 15 U.S.C. § 78u–5(c), “immunizes from liability any forward-looking statement, provided that: the statement is identified as such and accompanied by meaningful cautionary language; or
Cited 0 timesUnknownMELENDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 17, 2022
The ALJ clearly, albeit briefly, explained that the applicant’s cardiac impairments did not meet these listings’ criteria because he could not demonstrate requisite instances of acute congestive heart failure, syncope, … The court is unable to analyze this undeveloped argument, which is too indefinite and formless to establish any legal error in the ALJ’s decision.6 C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHEALTHQUEST OF CENTRAL JERSEY, LLC v. ANTARES AUL SYNDICATE 1274
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 25, 2022
The court considers whether: (1) the expert is qualified; (2) the expert’s testimony is reliable; and (3) the expert’s testimony is helpful to the trier of fact, i.e., it must “fit” the facts of the case. … As a result, the Court will grant Defendants’ motion. 4, Motion to establish Plaintiffs’ burden to establish the existence of a loss within the scope of the policy’s insuring agreement and also to establish
Cited 0 timesUnknownMURPHY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 30, 2020
I would offer my opinion that clearly her childbirth, her childrearing days were not easy. … It is well established that sporadic or transitory activity does not disprove disability.”). Smith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 25, 2022
the psychological records and reports would be kept strictly confidential, and would not be disclosed to the City of Trenton personnel[,]” the court in Caver found that the defendant “clearly … Nonetheless, the Court need not determine at this time whether fitness for duty reports categorically do not qualify for protection by the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSINGH v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 23, 2021
The FAA “establishes procedures by which federal courts implement” this “substantive rule.” Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. … workers who never personally crosses a border may still be “engaged in interstate commerce,” so long as the class on the whole is defined by such engagement, and conversely, a class of transportation workers may not qualify
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · May 31, 2020
In support of its argument that it had a reasonable probability of success, Plaintiff avers that “the wheels were clearly in motion. … Plaintiff similarly fails to establish causation.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVELEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 3, 2020
An impairment that manifests only some of those criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify.” Dismuke, 309 F. App’x at 616 (quoting Williams v. … It is the claimant’s burden to establish an inability to return to her past relevant work. See id. A failure of proof at step four dooms the claimant’s case. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(a)(4)(iv), 416.920(a)(4)(iv).
Cited 0 timesUnknownJASMIN v. NEW JERSEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 22, 2020
summary judgment motion on a race discrimination claim, a plaintiff must present evidence showing a genuine dispute of material fact on four elements: “(1) that [s]he is a member of a protected class; (2) that [s]he is qualified … See Clearly v. CBRL Group, No. 3:05CV02246, 2007 WL2212846, at *7 (M.D. Pa. July 31, 2007).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna