Case law

GABERY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 9, 2026

The ALJ clearly implicitly adopted Dr. Gardner’s opinion of moderate limitations and articulated the findings that supported that finding. R. 18–19. … “While ‘the ALJ must accurately convey to the vocational expert all of a claimant’s credibly established limitations,’ . . .

Farquharson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

31 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 6, 1999

Amerada Hess Shipping, 488 U.S. 428, 438 , 109 S.Ct. 683 , 102 L.Ed.2d 818 (1989), in which Congress’s decision to comprehensively deal with the area of foreign sovereign immunity was found to preclude review under the Alien … Congress, clearly capable of designating precisely which provisions it intends to affect by its amendments, elected only to repeal the INS habeas provision.

ETEAM, INC. v. SVS TECHNOLOGIES LTD

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2021

If the nonmoving party “fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which . . . … our demand that Infosys reimburse Northwestern Mutual in the amount of $1,300,000 for actual damages Northwestern Mutual has suffered as a result of Infosys’s supplying to us subcontracted employees who were either not qualified

IN RE CORMEDIX INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 30, 2025

Boilerplate disclaimers that warn of general risks that accompany investments are not sufficient to immunize a defendant from liability. … But the FDA regulations clearly place the burden of ensuring CMO compliance on the NDA sponsor, See 21 C.F.R. §§ 211.1, 314.50(d)(1)@). As such, CorMedix could not disclaim responsibility for ROVI’s deficiencies.

BROWN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 2, 2025

At Step Three, Judge Lee determined that Robyn did not have an “impairment or combination of impairments” that qualified under the Administration’s listed impairments. … ESTABLISHING ELIGIBILITY FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS AND SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME A claimant may establish disability under the Social Security Act by proving they are unable to “engage in any

UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF COLORADO CUSTOM ROCK CORP. v. G&C FAB-CON, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 14, 2024

“Evidence should not be excluded pursuant to a motion in limine, unless it is clearly inadmissible on all potential grounds. ... … As such, they qualify as business records and are admissible at trial.’ (ECF No. 86-1 at 28.)

MESSINO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 17, 2023

Federal law is “clearly established” for these purposes if it is clearly expressed in “the holdings, as opposed to the dicta” of the United States Supreme Court. … Mar. 29, 2010) (“there 62 is no clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court which suggests that admission

MURILLO-CASTILLO

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 18, 2026

In contrast, 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) governs the detention of noncitizens (without qualifying criminal convictions or charges) already present within the United States who may be detained pursuant to a warrant based on flight … Petitioner was clearly known to immigration authorities, as he applied for asylum and obtained work authorization.

SMARTE CARTE, INC. v. INNOVATIVE VENDING SOLUTIONS LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 4, 2025

In other words, a person skilled in the art must be able to “clearly conclude that the inventor invented the claimed invention as of the filing date sought.” , 595 F.3d at 1359 (quoting , 107 F.3d … But immunity doesn’t apply to “sham” suits that, under the guise of petitioning the government, “attempt to interfere directly with the business relationships of a competitor.”

RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 30, 2023

The Five-Step Process and this Court’s Standard of Review To qualify for Title II DIB benefits, a claimant must meet the insured status requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 423. … Although ALJ Shillin did not list each of these tasks and abilities in her decision, her examination of the objective medical evidence clearly addressed all five categories:

PENN v. EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 2019

In the present case, there is no dispute that (1) Plaintiff is a member of a protected class, as he is an African American; and (2) that Plaintiff was qualified for his position. … There is no dispute that Plaintiff establishes that he has engaged in protected activity.

BARATTA

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 17, 2026

Freehold Automotive therefore was permitted to run credit checks to determine whether Plaintiff qualified for a line of credit. Bentley vy. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC, 156 F. Supp. … The RISC, for example, is clearly labeled: “Retail Installment Sale Contract — Simple Finance Charge (With Arbitration Provision)[.]” (/d.)

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC

276 F. Supp. 3d 261 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 22, 2017

Cir. 1991) (“To establish infringement, every limitation set forth in a patent claim-must be found in an accused product .... ”). … But, it clearly doesn’t say that it doesn’t exist, it just says less.”) (emphasis added). Dr.

THE ESTATE OF GREGORY KUBIAK v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 25, 2021

patient properly or provide proper treatment, it would exclude allegations that a psychiatrist negligently tripped a patient when the patient entered the doctor’s office, which clearly … Decedent in that they failed to care for and treat him in accordance with the standard of care and skill required of and ordinarily exercised by average, qualified

INDUSTRIENS PENSIONSFORSIKRING v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 11, 2022

The Commissioner believes that the manufacturer is the person best qualified to make this determination.”). … Plaintiff need not establish that “all” prior modifications needed 510(k) clearance to establish falsity. In re Majesco Sec. Litig., 2006 WL 2846281, at *6 (D.N.J.

New Jersey Ass'n of Health Care Facilities, Inc. v. Gibbs

838 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 4, 1993

These shortfalls allegedly have occurred despite the facility’s efforts to keep wages, salaries, and benefits to the bare minimum that will attract qualified nursing staff while, at the same time, satisfying the two unions … Clearly, the State cannot be held responsible for losses occasioned by the facility’s poor business judgments.

DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 15, 2020

qualify.” … Plaintiff is incorrect; the ALJ clearly explained that the medical evidence in the record indicates that Plaintiff suffers from pseudoseizures rather than seizures.

Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System of NJ

584 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 1984

Defendant's initial brief largely established the importance of the state's interest in avoiding the appearance of impropriety in the judiciary. … or abridgement of fundamental rights, legislative convenience or the need for experimentation may provide secondary rationales for limiting the scope of state enactments. [22] The secondary rationale may compete with and qualify

SMEC AMERICA CORP v. AGGRESSIVE HYDRAULICS LEASING COMPANY, INC

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 4, 2022

While much of the relevant conduct clearly took place in Minnesota, critical decisions and events also occurred in New Jersey. … “The moving party bears the burden of establishing that the transfer is appropriate and must establish that the alternate forum is more convenient than the present forum.”

Naporano Iron & Metal Co. v. American Crane Corp.

79 F. Supp. 2d 494 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 18, 2000

While acknowledging that “a corporation may qualify as a person under the Act when it finds itself in a consumer oriented situation,” the court held that, in that situation, the NJCFA did not apply. … Co., 202 N.J.Super. 195, 197 , 494 A.2d 339 (App.Div.1985) (denying claim for punitive damages; noting that Sandler observations "clearly are dicta”); W.A.