Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjd

9,737 results

1.12s

  • In re Davis

    217 F. 113 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 3, 1914

    Desmare v. United States, 93 U. S. 605 , 23 L. Ed. 959 ; Morris v. Gilmer, 129 U. S. 315 , 9 Sup. Ct. 289, 32 L. Ed. 690 ; Anderson v. Watt, 138 U. S. 694 , 11 Sup. Ct. 449, 34 L. Ed. 1078 . … To the same effect is De Bonneval v. De Bonneval, 1 Curt. 856 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Castlerock Management, Ltd. v. Ultralife Batteries, Inc.

    68 F. Supp. 2d 480 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 1999

    “A section 11 claim can be asserted against every person who signed the prospectus, the issuer’s officers and board of directors, the underwriters of the securities offering[ ]”. Rhodes v. … See Ross v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • U.S. Ex Rel. Santana v. Fenton

    570 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 1981

    Thus, Lakeside v. … Wilcox v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Rene Santana v. Peter Fenton, Superintendent, Rahway State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, 685 F.2d 71 (1982)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boncek v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

    105 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 10, 1952

    See Board of Education of the Township of Marlboro v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., D.C., 105 F.Supp. 697 . … Thor Corp., 3 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 537 , certiorari denied 1951, 341 U.S. 903 , 71 S.Ct. 610 , 95 L.Ed. 1342 ; Board of Education of the Township of Marlboro v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., supra.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • SPORTS ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GOLDKLANG

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 22, 2025

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Rather, Stewart's sole contention is that AAPS and the Board owe her a fiduciary duty because she is a member of AAPS. . . .

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ATLAS SYSTEMS, INC. v. REDDY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 2021

    Brown (Partner) billed $585 per hour. (Tauriello Certification dated April 1, 2020 [sic], ¶¶ 7,13).1 Mr. … Brown (Partner)) plus $58.10 in costs. Defendants are directed to pay same no later than May 14, 2021. IV.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC v. SUMMIT FOOTWEAR CO., LTD.

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 2021

    Plaintiff Aero AG filed a notice of opposition with the PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) against Summit’s application on October 6, 2014. Id. at ¶ 27. … Inc. v. Brown, 487 F. App'x 758, 761 (3d Cir. 2012); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Minichiello Realty Associates, Inc. v. Britt

    460 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 27, 1978

    Board, etc., 57 N.J.L. 90 , 29 A. 490 (Sup.1894). … As was said in Casey v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • SALKIN v. LABROSSE

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 17, 2019

    Mirabella v. … Melo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PC

    777 F. Supp. 2d 811 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 10, 2011

    Brown v. … Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., 539 F.3d 218, 221 (3d Cir.2008) (quoting Brown, 464 F.3d at 454 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Klein v. Wilson & Co.

    7 F.2d 772 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 11, 1925

    Commonwealth v. Browne, 1 S. & R. 385; People v. Richardson, 4 Cow. [N. Y.] 102, note; State v. Hardie, 1 Iredell Law [23 N. C.] 42, 48; State Bank v. State, 1 Blackf. [Ind.] 267, 272 [12. Am. Dec. 234]; State v. … Attorney General v. Utica Insurance Company, 2 Johns. Ch. [N. Y.] 370, [371], 377; People v. Jones, 18 Wend. [N. Y.] 601; State v. West Wisconsin Railway Company, 34 Wis. 197, 213 ; State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • HOLTEC INTERNATIONAL v. TOWNSHIP OF LACEY

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 22, 2020

    v. … Acierno v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wearly v. Federal Trade Commission

    462 F. Supp. 589 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 18, 1978

    See, e. g., Durand v. Brown, 236 F. 609 (CA-6, 1916). For a comprehensive discussion of the same question involving the issuance of stock in exchange for patents, a closely related question, see Atlas Trailers, etc. v. … Board of Governors, etc., 413 F.Supp. 1274 (DN.J., 1976).

    Vacated on other grounds by Wearly v. Federal Trade Commission, 616 F.2d 662 (1980)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hovsons, Inc. v. Secretary of Interior of US

    519 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 14, 1981

    Like the Board of Education of Washington Township, this plaintiff alleges that it must raise 60% of the annual school budget. … In Concord Township v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • DeCampli v. Greeley

    293 F. Supp. 746 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 26, 1968

    See: Ryan v. Intl. Broth’d of Electrical Workers, 361 E.2d 942 (7 Cir. 1966); George v. Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers Int’l Union of America, 255 F.Supp. 239 (E.D.Wis.1966); Navarro v. … Gannon, 385 F.2d 512 (2 Cir. 1967); Stettner v. Int’l Printing Pressmen & Assistants’ Union, 278 F.Supp. 675 (E. D.Tenn.1967); Sawyers v. Grand Lodge, 1 A.M., 279 F.Supp. 747 (E.D.Mo., E.D. 1967); and Nix v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. Celebrezze

    243 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 8, 1965

    In Palmer v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Garden State Medical Group PA

    144 F. Supp. 2d 324 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 22, 2000

    See Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1080-81 (3d Cir.1996). … See also Hennessy v. FDIC, 58 F.3d 908 (3d Cir.1995); Lesman v. Ransburg Corp., 719 F.Supp. 619 (W.D.Mich.1989). C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mele v. United States Department of Justice

    395 F. Supp. 592 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 1975

    For example, in United States v. H. K. … However, in Hicks v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • CASTRO MONTERO v. TSOUKARIS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 9, 2021

    Petitioner thereafter filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals, which remains pending before the Board at this time. … Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 494-95, 500 (1973); see also Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 699 (2001). B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • THOMPSON v. JOHNSON

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 31, 2019

    The United States Parole Commission National Appeals Board (“the Appeals Board”) affirmed this decision, noting “the gravity of [Thompson’s] multiple offenses in and out of prison.” (Pet., Ex. … Id.; see also Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490 1 Thompson has three habeas proceedings currently pending before this Court. See Thompson v. D’Ilio, Civ. No. 13-6282; Thompson v. Davis, Civ. No. 18-16282.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.