Case law

United States v. Ernstoff

183 F.R.D. 148 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 16, 1998

Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 97 F.R.D. 749, 751 (E.D.Pa.1983); see also National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150 , 95 S.Ct. 1504 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Conoco Inc. v. … Board of Trustees of So. Ill. Univ., 937 F.2d 331, 334, n. 3 (7th Cir.1991) (at-issue exception); Pfohl Bros. Landfill Lit., 175 F.R.D. 13, 28 (W.D.N.Y.1997) (at-issue exception); Bowne of N.Y. City, Inc. v.

Tuma v. American Can Company

367 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 26, 1973

See Hodgson v. Sagner, Inc., 326 F.Supp. 371 (D.Md.1971), aff’d sub nom., Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board, 462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972). … Tuma and I filed with the National Labor Relations Board after our jobs were eliminated in September of 1967.

BARGE v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 17, 2025

See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. … Id.; accord, e.g., Brown v. SEPTA, 539 F.

TOROFIAS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2025

Brown and Dr. Spisak-Mosher and the testimony of Dr. Koenig (see Mov. … V.

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC

731 F. Supp. 2d 348 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 2010

of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”). … Merck & Co. v.

In re Faiola

185 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 8, 1960

In the case of Brown v. … On the face of the record before me, it appears affirmatively here, as in Brown v. Allen, supra, that petitioner’s constitutional rights have been fully protected.

Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

171 F. Supp. 2d 389 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 7, 2001

Parting ways with my distinguished colleague, Judge Brown, I conclude that Congress has validly abrogated the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity under both Title II and the Rehab. Act. … By this argument, however, Memphis and the Tennessee Board of Regents also lack the power to enter into a contract that would result in waiver.

GIBSON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2025

EVID. 407; see also Brown v. Brown, 432 A.2d 493, 501 (N.J. 1981) (admitting evidence of subsequent measure because feasibility was disputed). None of those exceptions are implicated here. 8 See FED. R. CIV. … Vincitore v. N.J.

Lesser v. City of Cape May

110 F. Supp. 2d 303 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 16, 2000

See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-68 (providing that the board of adjustment determines whether a particular use is non-conforming); see also Cronin v. … V.

McCall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

956 F. Supp. 1172 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 16, 1996

That plan covered, in relevant part, medical costs incurred at “a Skilled Nursing Facility for room and board and up to the cost of semi-private room and board accommodations for up to 100 days each calendar year.” … Gans v.

United States v. " VITASAFE FORMULA M"

226 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 5, 1964

The Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences has published its book, “Recommended Dietary Allowances.” … United States v. 8 Cartons, Containing “Plantation ‘The Original’ etc., Molasses,” 103 F.Supp. 626 (W.D.N.Y., 1957), United States v. 353 Cases Mountain Valley Mineral Water, 247 F.2d 473 (8th Cir. 1957). 2 .

HINES v. VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 12, 2024

See Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 660 (3d Cir, 2019) (citing 10 James Wm. … Matrix Distributors, Inc. v. Nat’l Ass’n of Boards of Pharmacy, 34 F.4th 190, 195 (3d Cir. 2022). Defendant is a corporation and not a state actor. See Abbott v.

ONUEKWUSI v. GRAHAM

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 22, 2021

Janowski v. City of North Wildwood, No. 16-4464, 2017 WL 1821078, at *4 (D.N.J. May 5, 2017) (quoting Batiz v. Brown, No. 12-581, 2013 WL 1137531, at *7 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2013)). … Estate of Roman v. City of Newark, 914 F.3d 789, 798, 800 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 215 (3d Cir. 2001)).

RICHARDS v. MONMOUTH COUNTY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 17, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). … Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993); see also Mayer v. Belichick, 605 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2010).

United States v. Van Wyk

83 F. Supp. 2d 515 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 8, 2000

Gardner v. General Motors Corp., 507 F.2d 525, 528 (10th Cir.1974); see also DeLuca v. … In that case, the Board credited the expert testimony of Dr. Gerald McMenamin in finding that certain anonymous letters were written by an employee of the California Water Resources Control Board. 7 .

Glendenning v. WGM Safety Corp.

795 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 6, 1992

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; Brown v. Hilton, 492 F.Supp. 771, 774 (D.N.J.1980). The burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists rests initially on the moving party. Goodman v. … In Crumb v.

ATLAS SYSTEMS, INC. v. REDDY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 4, 2020

Brown was Plaintiffs counsel and Ms. … Goney v. Clark, 749 F.2d 5, 6-7 (3d Cir. 1984) (citations omitted) (concluding that the “plaintiff's objections lacked the specificity necessary to trigger de novo review”); accord Brown v.

Forstmann v. Rogers

35 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 25, 1940

Justice Bushrod Washington, sitting at Philadelphia in Goodwin v. … In Alfonso v. United States, 1 Fed.Cas. pages 395, 398, No. 188, Mr.

Michaels v. State of NJ

955 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 8, 1996

Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266, 280, n. 6 , 114 S.Ct. 807 , 816 n. 6, 127 L.Ed.2d 114 (1994) (Ginsburg, J. concurring); Board of Regents v. … Chatman v. Hall, 128 N.J. 394, 403 , 608 A.2d 263 (1992); Morgan v. Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 268 N.J.Super. 337, 356-57 , 633 A.2d 985 (App.Div.1993).

EDWARDS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2026

Edwards (“Plaintiff”) in three separate cases: Edwards v. Filer (“Filer”), No. 26-625; Edwards v. N.J. Parole Board (“N.J. Parole Board”), No. 26-1611 ; and Edwards v. … ORDERED that the Complaints [Docket Nos. 1] in Edwards v. Filer, No. 26-625; Edwards v. N.J. Parole Board, No. 26-1611; and Edwards v.