Case law

SANCHEZ v. SCOTT

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 5, 2023

Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 245 (3d Cir. 2013) (citation omitted) (emphasis added). 5. The defendants to the complaint are Sergeant Brown and Officer Saltar, employees of HCCR. … Brown. This led to weeks of back and forth[]. Finally[,] after I returned from the hospital[,] Sgt[.] Brown told me that he is taking my job because of my medical problems[.]

Aldrich v. The W. H. Beaman

45 F. 125 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 13, 1891

As he was the only person pretending to act as a lookout on board the tug, it was his duty to keep a constant and sharp-watch upon the movements of the ferry-boat, whose slip, to which ho knew she was bound, was just ahead … Hancy v. Steam Packet Co., 23 How. 293 ; The Manhasset, 34 Fed. Rep. 408. Secondly. The Beaman was in fault in another particular.

Agathos v. Muellenberg

932 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 3, 1996

MEMORANDUM OPINION BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s application for injunctive relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. … Taylor v. Perini, 887 F.2d 1088 (6th Cir.1989); Bronson v. Howard, Civ. No. 86-1306, 1986 WL 7190 (E.D.Pa. June 18, 1986).

Walsh Securities, Inc. v. Cristo Property Management, Ltd.

7 F. Supp. 2d 523 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 9, 1998

The property was appraised by licensed appraisers (including Defendants Richard Calanni, Richard DiBenedetto, James Brown, Thomas Brodo, or Roland Pierson) at an inflated value. (Id. at ¶ 57(d).) … Trustees of Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc., 886 F.Supp. 1134, 1138 (S.D.N.Y.1995). A stay of a civil case is an “extraordinary remedy.” Weil v.

Holzsager v. Warburton

452 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 12, 1978

brought within 6 months after payment. *1273 Another example is N.J.S.A. 39:6-65 which makes notice of accident and intention to claim, with a time limit, a prerequisite to suit against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board … Noice v. Brown, 39 N.J.L. 569 . 35 . Soden v. Traction Co. [ 101 N.J.L. 393 ], 127 Atl. 558 , reversing [ 100 N.J.L. 27 ], 124 Atl. 710 ; Tichenor v. Hayes, 41 N.J.L. 193 ; Weller v. Jersey City Railway Co., 68 N.J.E.

SEALE v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 21, 2023

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). … See, e.g., United States v. Walker, No. 18-3580, 2019 WL 11093774, at *1 (3d Cir. Dec. 4, 2019); United States v.

Juliano v. Kane

701 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 1988

Co. v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 590 F.Supp. 1528, 1546 (W.D.Pa.1984); Eaby v. Richmond, 561 F.Supp. 131, 139 (E.D.Pa.1983). … After examining Leroy v.

FLOWERS v. WHEELER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 24, 2023

Orsatti v. N. J. … V.

Reich v. Hercules, Inc.

857 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 6, 1994

See FTC v. TRW, 628 F.2d at 211 ; U.S. v. Noall, 587 F.2d at 126 . … Most, such as the reviews by Hercules’ Nitroglycerin Board (“NGB”) and Aerospace Propulsion Standards Board (“APSB”), were made in the regular course of business, for at least two years prior to the accident in 1989, for

Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp.

752 F. Supp. 1231 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 5, 1990

Meagher (City Savings Bank’s in-house attorney responsible for ERISA matters) advised Kaplowitz that in order to effect the assumption of the Plan, City Savings Bank, F.S.B.’s Board of Directors or the RTC (until a board … See Brug v.

Venneman v. BMW Financial Services NA

990 F. Supp. 2d 468 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 30, 2013

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 362 F.3d 209, 216 (3d Cir.2004) (“The Federal Reserve Board has been given the authority to issue rules implementing the [Consumer Leasing Act] .... and the Board has exercised that authority … M to be more persuasive because “the Supreme Court instructed that the [Federal Reserve] Board’s interpretation of ... Regulation M should be accepted so long as [it is] ‘not irrational.’ ” Miller v.

Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

460 F. Supp. 2d 655 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 6, 2006

In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 392 (Fed.Cir.1991) (emphasis added); see also, e.g., Novozymes A/S v. … (See Pfizer v. Teva, No. 04-754, Opinion on Teva's Motion in Limine No. 4.)

United States v. Enger

472 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 25, 1978

This “prosecutorial self-contradiction,” see United States v. Riquelmy, supra; Brown v. United States, supra, has long been condemned. Jones v. United States, supra. … Accordingly, logically extending Brown , the defendants have actual standing to move to suppress. United States v.

CODY v. SWEENEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 30, 2023

Bellamy told Brown that a man had been robbed and the attackers fled through the park across the street. … Stabile, 633 F.3d at 241 n.17 (quoting Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 n.4 (1983)).

JACOBSON v. CHARM CITY AVIATION, LLC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 2, 2025

Brown v. Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009) (quoting In re Briscoe, 448 F.3d at 217). A claim is “colorable” when it is not “wholly insubstantial and frivolous.” Batoff, 977 F.2d at 852. … Brown, 575 F.3d at 326 (quoting Batoff, 977 F.2d at 851) (emphasis added).

Curri v. Reno

86 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 23, 2000

See Reno v. … In Catney v.

Coar v. Kazimir

792 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 12, 1992

The District of Columbia Circuit, in its opinion in Crawford v. … Defendants cite Carson v.

AL UMMAH COMMUNITY CENTER v. TEANECK

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 15, 2022

BARTA, EDWARD MULLIGAN, ATIF REHMAN, MARK MERMELSTEIN, ZEV GREEN, JAMES BROWN, in their … In Williamson, the Court held that the property developer’s Takings claim against a zoning board that had rejected the developer’s proposal for a new subdivision was not ripe because the appeals board had not acted

Gittleman v. Woodhaven Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

972 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 12, 1997

Martinez v. … The court held that the plaintiffs claim against the cooperative board and its members was likely to succeed despite this seeming limitation on the board’s ability to act in the absence of a vote of the cooperative’s members

BLACKMON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 25, 2024

Petitioner cites to Block v. … See New Jersey Parole Board vy. Byrne, 460 A.2d 103, 111 (N.J. 1983); see also McGill v. Nogan, No. 14-6126, 2019 WL 2095601, at *3 (D.N.J.