Case law

Windt v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.

544 F. Supp. 2d 409 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2008

BROWN, JR., Chief Judge. … KPNQwest’s Board’s meetings. See id. ¶¶ 23, 25, 28.

Township of Marlboro v. Scannapieco

545 F. Supp. 2d 452 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 23, 2008

Accord Curiale v. … Accord Anderson v.

Forchion v. Intensive Supervised Parole

240 F. Supp. 2d 302 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 24, 2003

Yet the balance of its duties is closer to those of a parole board than to those of a court. … While it does have the power to modify the sentences of inmates, a judicial function, in this case it is using its power in the fashion of a parole board. See State v.

Mruz v. Caring, Inc.

107 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 4, 2000

In Hall v. … Leis v.

Beer v. Moffatt

192 F. 984 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 29, 1912

Counsel also cite and rely upon the following cases: Davison v. Rake et al., 45 N. J. Eq. 767, 18 Atl. 752 , and Welsh v. Brown, 43 N. J. Law 37. … The same principle was also laid down by the Supreme Court in Welsh v. Brown, supra, one of the cases cited by plaintiff’s counsel.

Ulferts v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

554 F. Supp. 2d 568 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 24, 2008

Basic, Inc. v. … .”); see Benzon v.

MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. v. SELTZER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 9, 2023

Brown y, Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009) (citations omitted). … The service processer used by the Plaintiff described the individual that accepted service at the correct address for the house at issue as a female, aged 50-60, Asian ethnicity, brown hair, brown eyes, between 5°4”

BREAKWATER TREATMENT AND WELLNESS CORP. v. THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 10, 2024

West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (citations omitted); City of Okla. City v. … Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366 (1979). Hauptmann v. Wilentz, 570 F.

Angleton v. Pierce

574 F. Supp. 719 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 30, 1983

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Board of Regents v. … Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 361 (5th Cir.1977) (same, for 12 U.S.C. § 1715z mortgage insurance and subsidy program).

Weiss v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

497 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 2, 2007

Background It is undisputed that Weiss was employed by the Essex County Vocational Board of Education as a teacher of food services in Newark, New Jersey. … Petruzzi’s IGA Supermarkets, Inc. v.

Shelton Electric Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.

277 F. 433 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 4, 1922

Chief Justice Beasley, in Cowenhoven v. Board of Freeholders, 44 N. J. Law, 232, held that a common pleas judge, seeking to recover fees allowed him by statute, was not barred by the six years’ limitation. … In Jersey City v. Sackett, 44 N. J.

DAVISON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 6, 2020

Brown’s report is correct. … Brown’s report. See Chandler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 667 F. 3d 356 (3d Cir. 2011) (“State agent opinions merit significant consideration . . . .”). It appears that he did so.

SMITH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 8, 2025

R. 2:2-3(a)(2); Trantino v. NS. State Parole Bd., 166 N.J.113, 172 (2001), modified on other grounds, 167 N.J. 619 (2001). The right to appeal extends to decisions by the New Jersey State Parole Board. … (citation omitted)); Bronshtein v.

United States v. Lisk

939 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 5, 1996

Browning, 61 F.3d 752, 756-57 (10th Cir.1995); but see United States v. Onick, 889 F.2d 1425, 1433 (1989), reh’g denied, 894 F.2d 1335 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Cooper, 827 F.2d 991, 994-95 (4th Cir.1987). … See United States v.

G-69 v. Degnan

745 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 21, 1990

In short, plaintiffs claim that the contract with the state afforded them property rights under Board of Regents v. … (a) Property Interest The Supreme Court defined “property” as protected by the due process clause in Board of Regents v.

J.J.C. Boats, Inc. v. Hlywiak

613 F. Supp. 2d 647 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 13, 2009

But see Ozanic v. … .”); Ozanic v.

Noel v. Airponents, Inc.

169 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 23, 1958

See the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Good *350 man in the case of Wilson v. Transocean Airlines, D.C., 121 F.Supp. 85 ; see also Higa v. Transocean Airlines, D.C., 124 F.Supp. 13 ; but see Noel v. … It was stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Lauritzen v.

Grumet v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

564 F. Supp. 336 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 26, 1983

In Tarasi v. … See, e.g., SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir.1968) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Coates v. SEC, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1454 , 22 L.Ed.2d 756 (1969). See also Staffin v.

In Re Main Street Beverage Corp.

232 B.R. 303 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 1998

Meridian Bank v. Alten, 958 F.2d 1226, 1229 (3d Cir.1992). … In Boss Co., Inc. v.

OROZCO v. MCKINLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 10, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citation omitted). … Caviness v. Aramark Corr. Servs., No. 14- cv-7068, 2015 WL 1888246, at *2 (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2015). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim against the Board is dismissed without prejudice. C.