Case law

City of Paterson v. Baker

5 N.J. Misc. 1075 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1927

The owners appealed to the Passaic county board of taxation. The county board reduced the assessment to $90,000 on the land and $25,000 on the buildings. … The amount fixed by the county board of taxation was accepted as the value of the property by the state board of taxes and assessment, and the assessment of the county board of taxation was affirmed.

Freeholders of Middlesex County v. Baker

109 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1932

Blake v. Bd. of Review

233 N.J. 296 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 26, 2018

Francis v. United Jersey Bank

87 N.J. 15 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1981

Williams v. McKay, supra, at 37. Accordingly, a director is well advised to attend board meetings regularly. … That burden is lightened by N.J.S.A. 14A:6 — 7(2) (Supp.1981-1982), which permits board action without a meeting if all members of the board consent in writing.

Burg v. Bd. of Review, Dep't of Labor

232 N.J. 101 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 2018

Penter v. Tipping

10 N.J. Misc. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1932

This case is presented on demurrer to the return of the board of chosen freeholders of Bergen county to an alternative writ of mandamus requiring that body to deduct from the monthly compensation of one Penter three per cent … The return of the board is to the effect that no demand has been made by the relator. It also denies that the relator is eligible to participate in such pension fund.

Vreeland v. Van Blarcom

35 N.J. Eq. 530 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1882

Subsequently, Moses and wife conveyed the lands to Reuben V. Brown, by a deed reciting that the land was subject to said mortgage, and adding the words,, “which said party of the second part assumes.” … The language of the covenant bound Brown, we think, to pay the mortgage. Sparkman v. Gove, 15 Vr. 252 .

Canfield v. Browning

69 N.J.L. 553 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1903

Kemble v. Harris, 7 Vroom 526; Wills v. McKinney, 12 Id. 120; Bogert v. Lydecker, 16 Id. 314; Clement v. Kaighn, 2 McCart. 47. … In Wills v.

Pilgrim Co. v. Rosenblum

130 N.J.L. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1943

Williams v. Connolly Contracting Co., 74 N. J. L. 105; Suburban Home Co. v. Matulewich, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 208; affirmed, 113 N. J. L. 403; Rudensey v. Hoffman, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 259; Glickfeld v.

In Re the Estate of Norrell

137 N.J. Eq. 207 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1945

v. … Eq. 195, 198, clarified the law and, citing Brown v. Ryder and Davenport v.

McCracken v. Meyers

75 N.J.L. 935 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1908

Furey v. … Griffin v. Manice, 166 N. Y. 188 .

Crawford's Clothes, Inc. v. Bd. of Comrs. of Newark

131 N.J.L. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1944

The case of Spiro Drug Service, Inc., v. Union City, 130 N. J. L. 1, is not in point. The ordinance there regulated the closing hours of drug stores only. … Siciliano v. Neptune, 83 Id. 158. The conviction is set aside and the ordinance is declared to be invalid, with costs.

Delaware v. Shelton

55 N.J.L. 342 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

Co. v. … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 13. For reversal — Hone.

In Re the Revocation or the Suspension of the Provisional Accreditation of &/Or the Imposition of Probation on Eastwick College

225 N.J. 533 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 13, 2016

Court’s decision in Metromedia, Inc. v. … Bank, N.A., supra, 210 N.J. at 199 (quoting Bedford, supra, 195 N.J. at 222); In re Election Law Enf’t, supra, 201 N.J. at 263 (citing DiProspero v. Penn, 183 N.J. 477, 492-93 (2005)); Lozano v.

In re the Directive of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

110 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 18, 1988

Each person appearing before the board shall have the right to counsel. *79 Determinations made by the board shall be final. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Rowatti v. Gonchar

97 N.J. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1984

Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of Guttenberg

66 N.J.L. 58 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1901

And this is stated to be the situation in the opinion of this court in Herrman v. … e., the proceedings of the board of councilmen], and by the proofs, to have been correctly ascertained, and it exceeds the amount of $90,000.”

Applied Monroe Lender, LLC v. City of Hoboken Planning Bd.

234 N.J. 10 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 2018

Hulme v. Donnelly

95 N.J.L. 545 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1921

Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.

72 N.J. Eq. 387 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1907

Justice Brown’s opinion. … I refer to State v. Sooy, this N. J. Law (12 Vr.) 394, and Willard v. Denise, 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 483.