Opinion

Hulme v. Donnelly

95 N.J.L. 545
112 A. 498
1921 N.J. LEXIS 148

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed: Feb 28, 1921
Status: Published
Author: Cueiajvl
On the bench: Affirmance, Aokbrson, Bergen, Chancedlor, Cueiajvl, Gardner, Heppüntieimer, Justioe, Kadiscií, Kat, Mlntürn, None, Parker, Reversal, Taylor, Trexcirard, White, Williams, Zenbacu
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.