Case law

Cliff v. Morris County Board of Social Services

101 N.J. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1985

West Side Presbyterian Church v. Board of Adjustment

97 N.J. 623 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1984

Certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider on the merits the propriety of the Board’s denial of plaintiff’s variance application. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Barsel v. Woodbridge Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

94 N.J. 542 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1983

Meyer v. Borough of Tinton Falls Planning Board

91 N.J. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 21, 1982

Borough of Oakland v. Board of Conservation & Development

98 N.J.L. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1922

Society, &c., v. Board of Conservation and Development, 90 N. J. L. 469; affirmed, 91 Id. 718. … L. 104; affirmed, 85 Id. 673; City of New Brunswick v. Board of Conservation and Development, 94 Id. 46; affirmed, Id. 558; Society, &c., v.

Bank of Bergen County v. Board of Education

84 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

The suit was to recover a balance of moneys loaned, and the balance claimed arose in this way: The defendant board of education intending to buy land and erect thereon a new school house, wont through the legal formalities … The original proceedings of the board and the original authority given to it by the voters were based on the proposed purchase of the Kip site.

Boyer v. Board of Review Unemployment Compensation Commission

137 N.J.L. 91 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 1948

Rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue was allowed in this case to review so much of the decision of the Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission of New Jersey as holds that prosecutor … An appeal from the determination of the appeal tribunal was taken by claimant to the Board of Review, which, after hearing, affirmed the determination of the appeal tribunal on the ground of unavailability for work as required

Intrastate Oil Co. v. Board of Commrs., Orange

111 N.J.L. 354 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1933

Matlack v. Lloyd, 82 N. J. L. 739; Camden v. Public Service Railway Co., 84 Id. 309. The appeal must be dismissed.

Willets Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

60 N.J.L. 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1897

Trustees v. Fisher, 3 Harr. 256 . If a plea does not by fair intendment confess the doing of the acts complained of, it is bad as a justification. Gould Pl. 340.

State ex rel. Bott v. Board of Registry

61 N.J.L. 160 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1897

This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to be directed to the board of registry and election, commanding said board to reconvene and count the ballots cast at said election for the proposed constitutional

Central Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review’ herein will he affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 383). ■ For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Sways®, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, 1 Gardner, Ackerson

State ex rel. Elmendorf v. Board of Finance

41 N.J.L. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1879

Little, v. … It does not therefore differ in substance from the case of Cleveland v.

Diamond Wall Cement Co. v. Board of Education

98 N.J. Eq. 410 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 5, 1925

Borough of Chatham v. Board of Conservation & Development

107 N.J.L. 101 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1930

In this connection it is urged that the board, in reaching its conclusion, used and considered a report of a Mr. Critchlow, the head of the division of waters, an expert employed by the board. … That the functions of the board are gwasi-judicial was definitely settled by this court in Oakland v. Bayonne, 98 N. J. L. 806. Consequently the usual and recognized rules governing such bodies must be applied.

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes

101 N.J.L. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1925

The point was made by proofs and exceptions on the appeal, before the state board, as the proper practice, as pointed out in the case of the Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N. J. L. 1. … New Jersey Midland Railroad Co. v. Mayor, &c., Jersey City, 42 N. J. L. 97. It means an official valuation of property for taxation. It does not mean simply the computation of tire tax. 1 Words & Phr. 547.

Township of Teaneck v. State Board of Tax Appeals

111 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1933

Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of West New York

133 N.J.L. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1945

Board of Health v. Werner, 67 N. J. L. 103; Perrine Terrace Land Co. v. Brennan, 101 Id. 487. We conceive this to be a misinterpretation. … Falco v. Atlantic City, 99 N. J. L. 19. Compare Spiro Drug Service, Inc., v. Board of Commissioners of Union City, 130 Id. 1; affirmed, Ibid. 496. Starkey v. Atlantic City, 132 Id. 27; Wagman v. Trenton, 102 Id.. 492.

Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

119 N.J.L. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 4, 1937

Marten v. Brown, 81 N. J. L. 599: 80 Atl. Rep. 476 ; Bahrey v. Poniatishin, 95 N. J. L. 128; 112 Atl. Rep. 481 ; Eggert v. Mutual Grocery Co., 111 N. J. L. 502, 503; 168 Atl. Rep. 312 . … Universal Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 118 N. J. L. 538, 541; 193 Atl. Rep. 915 ; see Farmers Loan and Trust Co. v. Minnesota, supra.

Bansch v. Cherry Hill Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

118 N.J. 182 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 3, 1989

Longo v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

117 N.J. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 6, 1989