The opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bodine, J.
The relator attempts to have us review an order of the Supreme Court discharging a rule to show cause why
mandamus
should not issue to compel the issuance of a building permit and a license for the erection of a gasoline service station.
Since the constitutionality of a statute is not involved, the Supreme Court’s refusal of
mandamus
is not reviewable in this court.
Matlack
v. Lloyd, 82
N. J. L.
739;
Camden
v.
Public Service Railway
Co., 84
Id.
309.
The appeal must be dismissed.
For dismissal
— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.