Case law

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Blechschmidt

6 N.J. Misc. 682 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1928

So far, in this court, it is not an open question, but is controlled by such cases as State Board of Medical Examiners of New Jersey v. De Young, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 231, and the State Board of Medical Examiners v.

Board of Trustees v. Mayor of Hoboken

89 N.J.L. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1916

Board of Trustees v. West Shore Railroad

85 N.J.L. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1914

The features of this case are substantially identical with those in the case of Ridgefield Park v. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Co., ante p. 279.

Decker v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

87 N.J.L. 316 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1914

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the ease of Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, decided January 7th, 1915, ante p. 179.

Shell Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment

37 N.J. 134 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1962

Trenton v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

91 N.J.L. 719 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1918

The Supreme Court based its judgment affirming the order made by the board of public utilities upon the single ground that an ordinance passed by the city of Trenton in 1909 constitutes a contract that bound not only the

Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

2 N.J. Misc. 952 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1924

This assessment was affirmed on appeal to. the Camden county board of taxation and the state board of taxes and assessment. … The judgments of the county and state boards are affirmed and the assessment of $65,000 confirmed, with costs.

Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation

91 N.J.L. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 24, 1917

Long Dock Co. v. State Board, 78 N. J. L. 44; affirmed, 79 Id. 604. … The. first of these propositions is illustrated in the classic case of State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., 48 N. J. L. 146, and the second in the more recent case of Tippett v.

Hitchman v. Nagy

186 N.J. 600 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 2006

Penna. R.R. v. Board Public Utility Commrs.

116 N.J.L. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

179 Duncan Avenue Corp. v. Board of Adjustment

122 N.J.L. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 29, 1939

Subsequently, upon the protests of neighboring business people, a hearing was had *293 before the Board of Adjustment, as a result of which the board voided the permit issued to the prosecutor. … This legal principle is supported by a line of cases of which Gabrielson v. Glen Ridge, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 142, is typical. See, also, State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 Id. 183.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Wallen

15 N.J. Misc. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1936

The complaint of the state board of medical examiners charged that Benjamin B. … Davis v. Board of Registration, 251 Mass. 283 ; 146 N. E. Rep. 708. See cases collated in the annotation — Physicians—Revocation of License — 54 A. L. R. 1516; 82 Id. 1187.

Clayton v. Freehold Township Board of Education

67 N.J. 72 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1975

Butt Realty Co. v. Board of Adjustment

134 N.J.L. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1946

State v. Board of Health & Vital Statistics

85 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 26, 1913

The argument is that as the act of 1887 is a general law, providing not only for a state board of health and bureau of vital statistics, but a local board in each of the municipalities of the state, and conferring upon such … boards created by the later enactment.

General Omnibus Co. v. Board of Commissioners

97 N.J.L. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 9, 1922

Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of Hoboken

137 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1948

Petitioners seek certiorari to review a resolution of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken, granting a permit to the defendant, Avenel Industrial Realty Corporation, for the erection of a one-story super market … In the instant case there is no finding by the Board of Adjustment that a denial of the application will cause the owner unnecessary hardship. In Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N. J. L. 1 (at p. 3), Mr.

Central Railroad v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

98 N.J. Eq. 677 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1925

The defense is interposed bj1" the county boards to the complainant’s bill is that the complainont, on September 1st, 1892, granted to the board of chosen freeholders the right, license and privilege of entering in and upon … In Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Erie Railroad Co., 21 N. J.

Coulter v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 130 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1941

The assessments were affirmed by the County Board of Taxation. The State *131 Board oí Tax Appeals reduced three of the assessments and affirmed the others. … Compare Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. State Board of Tax Appeals, decided this day, 126 N. J. L. 126. The judgment is accordingly affirmed, but without costs.

Dannenbaum v. Board of Adjustment, Atlantic City

123 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1939

The premises are in “Business Zone Ho. 2” and the ordinance forbids in that zone “(15) Motor vehicle service or gasoline filling station except as permitted by the Board of Adjustment.” … The resolution of the Board of Adjustment and the resolution of the Board of Commissioners were, in our judgment, without legal support, and will be set aside, with costs.