Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncmd

1,435 results

1.37s

  • ULTRA-MEK, INC. v. UNITED FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2021

    Gross v. … Brown, II (“Brown Report”) (Doc. 136-10) at 44.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • EVANS v. KIJAKAZI

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 3, 2022

    Brown v. Colvin, 2014 WL 4666978 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2014.) … Brown v. Colvin, 639 F. App’x at 923.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Scoggins v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc.

    339 F. Supp. 2d 702 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 16, 2004

    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(e); Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196, n. 1 (1984); Nguyen, 1999 WL 556446 , at *3, 1999 U.S.App. LEXIS 17978, at *9. … Louis v. Alverno Coll., 744 F.2d 1314, 1316-17 (7th Cir.1984); Hill, 869 F.2d at 1124 ; Anyanwu v. NCH Corp., 1998 WL 920327 , at *4 (N.D.Tex.1998), 1998 U.S. Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blair v. Young Phillips Corp.

    158 F. Supp. 2d 654 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 31, 2001

    In 1998, Plaintiff was named vice chairman of the Young Phillips board of directors. After assuming the position of vice chairman of the board of directors, Plaintiff still maintained his positions as president and COO. … In Delaye v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • BACON v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 1, 2021

    Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 285 N.C. 313, 204 S.E.2d 829, 834 (1974). … See, e.g., Boone v. Board of Governors of Univ. of N.C., No. 1:17cv113, 2018 WL 18 1620971, at *3 (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PBM Graphics Inc.

    877 F. Supp. 2d 334 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 2012

    Edwards v. Murphy-Brown, L.L.C., 760 F.Supp.2d 607, 614 (E.D.Va.2011). Here, of course, the EEOC filed a charge on October 17, 2005, and exhausted its administrative requirements. … Indeed, in a three-month period beginning on March 28, 2008, PBM’s chairman of the board, chief financial officer, chief administrative officer, and president all left the company. (Doc. 19 (Mussler Declaration) at 2.)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • LUFFMAN

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2026

    Luffman has not stated a claim for tortious interference because they had a qualified privilege to interfere with her contract as corporate fiduciaries of the Board. See Embree Constr. Grp. v. … Luffman contends that Abell v. Nash County Board of Education, 71 N.C. App. 48, 321 S.E.2d 502 (1984), authorizes her implied cause of action.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Optolum, Inc. v. Cree, Inc.

    336 F. Supp. 3d 571 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 22, 2018

    through the circuit board to a metallization layer on the opposite surface of the circuit board and then to the cooling member via an adhesive layer. … Rather, the thermally non-conductive printed circuit board 1 carries the LEDs 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McBroom v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.

    429 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 4, 1977

    They rely on the case of Wetzel v. … Martinez v. Bechtel Corp., 10 EPD 10,570 (N.D.Cal.1975); and Lamphere v. Brown University, 71 F.R.D. 641 (D.R.I.1976). 3 . See Pittman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Kerr

    73 F.R.D. 691 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 1977

    Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26 , 96 S.Ct. 1917 , 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976); Warth v. Selden, 422 U.S. 490 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 , 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975); Sierra Club v. … The defendants vigorously disagree, relying on the more recent cases of Board of School Commissioners of Indianapolis v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128 , 95 S.Ct. 848 , 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975), and Bradley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Swaim v. Westchester Academy, Inc.

    170 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 14, 2001

    See Hiler v. … Cohn v. Bond, 953 F.2d 154, 159 (4th Cir.1991).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • WELLS v. LYNCH

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 15, 2024

    Beck v. … Thus, the Board’s argument for dismissal on this issue should also be denied. See e.g., Dickinson v. Univ. of N. Carolina, 91 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MCNEILL v. GADDY

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 9, 2023

    Corti v. Storage Tech. Corp., 304 F.3d 336, 341 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting Brown v. CSX Transp., Inc., 18 F.3d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 1994)). … Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563–67 (1974)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davis Co. v. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc.

    86 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 12, 1949

    Brown v. Zaubitz, C.C., 105 F. 242 ;. National Hollow Brake Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake Beam Co., 8 Cir., 106 F. 693 . (2) Triangle Hosiery Mills. … Brown v. Puget Sound Reduction Co., C.C., 110 F. 383,386 . Scott and Williams never had any patent rights to men’s half hose and consequently could not confer an implied license to make them under the Getaz patent.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • LEON DE RODRIGUEZ v. SAUL

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 26, 2020

    Albright v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. … (citing Brown v. Commissioner Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251 (4th Cir. 2017), and Monroe v. Colvin, 826 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2016)).)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Johnson

    122 F. Supp. 3d 272 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2015

    See Brown v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. … Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INSURANCE COMPANY v. USA FREIGHT SOLUTION, INC.

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 13, 2020

    Brown’s insurer sought a declaratory judgment in federal court that “it need not cover a judgment against Brown for damages arising from an accident in which neither Brown nor his insured vehicles … Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Const.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Currie v. United States

    644 F. Supp. 1074 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 1986

    Azzolino v. … Avery’s case was reviewed twice by a board made up of eight Duke University faculty members, seven of whom were board-certified in psychiatry.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Carey v. United States

    183 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 19, 1960

    Batton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 1937, 212 N.C. 256 , 193 S.E. 674 ; certiorari denied, 1938, 303 U.S. 651 , 58 S.Ct. 750 , 82 L.Ed. 1112 . Cf. Hill v. … See Ellington v. Ricks, 179 N.C. 686 , 102 S.E. 510 ; Revis v. Orr, 234 N.C. 158 , 66 S.E.2d 652 ; Deaton v. Board of Trustees of Elon College, 226 N.C. 433 , 38 S.E.2d 561 .”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.

    440 F. Supp. 2d 465 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 6, 2006

    He is board certified in medical genetics and forensic medicine. … ”); Haim v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.