Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,435 results
0.40s
Harrison v. Edison Bros. Apparel Stores, Inc.
814 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 19, 1993
Bohrer v. Hanes Corp., 715 F.2d 213, 216 (5th Cir.1983). … Brown v. Burlington Indus., 93 N.C.App. 431, 436 , 378 S.E.2d 232, 235 (1989); Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co., 79 N.C.App. at 491 , 340 S.E.2d at 121 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedFederated Mutual Insurance v. Williams Trull Co.
838 F. Supp. 2d 370 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 2011
According to her, “[o]n the way to Reidsville, they went by a trailer in Browns Summit. She did not go in the trailer.” (Doc. 113.) Brown’s Summit, of course, is where Saferight’s trailer was located. … United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMITCHELL v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2020
Riddle Buncombe County Board of Education, 805 S.E.2d 757, 760 (N.C. App. 2017) (quoting Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hosp. Ventures of Asheville, 334 N.C. 669, 672, 435 S.E.2d 320, 322 (1993)). … American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, Inc. v. Wicomico County, Md., 999 F.2d 780, 785 (4th Cir. 1993) (citing Huang v. Board of Governors of University of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 1134, 1140 (4th Cir.1990)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 7, 2023
.”); Brown v. Mitchell, 308 F. Supp. 2d 682, 708 (B.D. … See Jackson v. Holley, 666 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPiedmont Minerals Co. v. United States
294 F. Supp. 1040 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 15, 1969
Biritz Construction Co. v. C. I. R., 8 *1046 Cir., 387 F.2d 451 (1967); Byerlite Corp. v. Williams, 6 Cir., 286 F.2d 285 (1960). There was such a business purpose in this case. … Piedmont Corporation v. C. I. R., 4 Cir., 388 F.2d 886 (1968); Rowan v. United States, 5 Cir., 219 F.2d 51 (1955).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Amsterdam Casualty Com. v. Waller
196 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 17, 1961
In Ewbank v. … In Sexton v.
Reversed on other grounds by New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-Appellee, 301 F.2d 839 (1962)Cited 4 timesPublishedFleet Finance, Inc. v. Ivey (In Re Ivey)
147 B.R. 109 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 24, 1992
See United States v. … For example, United States v. Arnold, 878 F.2d 925 (6th Cir.1989); Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v.
Overruled by United Carolina Bank v. Loretta A. Degolier Hall, 993 F.2d 1126 (1993)Cited 9 timesPublishedEFIRD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025
Id. at 612 (quoting Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383, 389 (4th Cir. 2001)); Buffington v. Baltimore Cnty., 913 F.2d 113, 120 (4th Cir. 1990). … See Tellabs, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOlivares v. University of Chicago
213 F. Supp. 3d 757 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2016
Products & Holdings, LLC v. R.T.G. … Desiano v. Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 91 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir. 1993)) aff'd sub nom. Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMAGEE v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 2, 2023
Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res. … See Ocheltree v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. FAYETTEVILLE CROSS CREEK LLC
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 2021
Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 319 (4th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). With regards to the second consideration, “hardship” may be “measured by the immediacy of the threat and the burden imposed” on a plaintiff. … Co. v. Mizell, 530 S.E.2d 93, 95 (N.C. Ct.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 18, 2024
Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). … Calder v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLOWERY v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 2022
Wéalcox v. Brown, 877 F.3d 161, 170 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation matks and citation omitted). Thus, a claim under § 1983 “requires factual detail about each defendant’s personal involvement.” … Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982); Heyer v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 849 F.3d 202, 209 n.6 (4th Cir. 2017) (citing Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn re Carolina First Securities Group, Inc.
173 B.R. 884 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 1994
S.E.C. v. F.O. … In S.E.C. v. F.O.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 15, 2024
Id.; see also Simmons v. … Brown, No. 5:22-CV-00179-BO, 2022 WL 3225088, at *2 (E.D.N.C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSurrey Investment Services, Inc. v. Smith
418 B.R. 140 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 16, 2009
See Grundy Nat’l Bank v. … See, e.g., Jeffrey v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTHE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY v. WOLFSPEED, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2023
Further, “[t]he statutory provisions governing the inter partes review process do not permit the Board to institute inter partes review of claims for indefiniteness. . . . … Nor [can] the Board cancel those claims as indefinite on its own accord.” Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc. v. Prisua Eng’g Corp., 948 F.3d 1342, 1350–51 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
Cited 0 timesUnknownVAUGHN, JR. v. ALLY FINANCIAL, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024
BROWN, ) ) Defendants. ) … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2025
In Plaintiff’s view, the “‘ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to h[er] conclusion that [Plaintiff]’s testimony was not credible’” (id. at 11 (quoting Brown v. … Arakas v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 15, 2026
Welfare Fund v. Brown, No. 12 CV 10268, 2014 WL 4057367, at *1 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 14, 2014). … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna