Case law

Deadwood, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

148 N.C. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 28, 2001

Further appeal to the Tax Review Board and then to Superior Court resulted in affirmations of the agency decisions. … Next, Deadwood argues that the administrative decision of the Tax Review Board violated Article V, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution.

In Re the Arbitration Between Cohoon & Ziman

60 N.C. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1983

. *229 Ziman contends that under a recent decision by our Supreme Court, Board of Education v. … Sobel v. Hertz, Warner & Co., 469 F. 2d 1211, 1214 (2nd Cir. 1972). The North Carolina Supreme Court, quoting Patton v.

State v. Williams

1 N.C. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 22, 1968

State v. McGowan, 243 N.C. 431 , 90 S.E. 2d 703 . Our Supreme Court in State v. … Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 , held: “It is well settled by this Court, that the power of the Superior Court to allow amendments to warrants is very comprehensive, (citations omitted.)

Simms v. Mason's Stores, Inc. (NC-1)

18 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 23, 1973

See Williams v. Hartis, 18 N.C. App. 89 , 195 S.E. 2d 806 (1973); Leasing, Inc. v. Brown, 14 N.C. App. 383 , 188 S.E. 2d 574 (1972).

Stinchcomb v. Presbyterian Medical Care Corp.

211 N.C. App. 556 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2011

Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C. App. 264, 267 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 722 (1981). Ordinarily, there is no right of appeal from an interlocutory order. CBP Resources, Inc. v. Mountaire Farms, Inc., 134 N.C. … Brown, J., in interpreting the meaning of the words ‘immediately’ and ‘forthwith,’ said in Claus v.

LYONS-HART v. Hart

205 N.C. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

Whatley v. Whatley, 126 N.C. App. 193, 194 , 484 S.E.2d 420, 421 (1997). … Butler v. Weisler, 23 N.C. App. 233, 238 , 208 S.E.2d 905, 909 (1974) (citing Brown v. Boger, 263 N.C. 248, 256 , 139 S.E.2d 577, 583 (1965)).

Wideni77 v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., & I-77 Mobility Partners LLC

253 N.C. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2017

Opinion of the Court shall be reviewed by the Turnpike Authority Board. … methodology last reported to the Turnpike Authority Board.

Eli Global, LLC v. Heavner

250 N.C. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2016

Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 261, 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 (citation omitted), disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 426, 395 S.E.2d 675-76 (1990). … Alienated customers may file antitrust lawsuits as has been done in the electrode, container board OSB, or other sectors.

Ratledge v. Perdue

239 N.C. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2015

Ford v. McCain, 192 N.C.App. 667 , 672, 666 S.E.2d 153 , 157 (2008). … See McKoy v.

State v. Lee

148 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2002

Ed. 2d 197, 213 (1979); State v. Brown, 112 N.C. App. 390, 395-97 , 436 S.E.2d 163, 166-68 (1993), aff’d per curiam, 339 N.C. 606 , 453 S.E.2d 165 (1995)). … State v. Brown, 112 N.C. App. 390, 396 , 436 S.E.2d 163, 167 (1993) (citing State v. Simpson, 314 N.C. 359 , 334 S.E.2d 53 (1985); Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444 , 16 L. Ed. 2d at 707 )).

Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

48 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 1980

See Routh v. Hudson-Belk Co., 263 N.C. 112 , 139 S.E. 2d 1 (1964); Jones v. Pinehurst, Inc., 261 N.C. 575 , 135 S.E. 2d 580 (1964); Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 259 N.C. 241 , 130 S.E. 2d 338 (1963); Little v. … In that case Randolph County maintained a bulletin board which extended 19 inches over a staircase. The plaintiff was looking up for a notice on the board and fell down the steps.

Childers v. Childers

19 N.C. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 22, 1973

Mahan v. Read, 240 N.C. 641 , 83 S.E. 2d 706 (1954). … Hinkle v. Hinkle, 266 N.C. 189 , 146 S.E. 2d 73 (1966); Kiger v. Kiger, 258 N.C. 126 , 128 S.E. 2d 235 (1962); Rabon v. Ledbetter, 9 N.C. App. 376 , 176 S.E. 2d 372 (1970).

Laborers' International Union v. Case Farms, Inc.

127 N.C. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 1997

In Poole v. Local 305 Nat’l Post Office Mail Handlers, 69 N.C. … Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 134 L.

In re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.

79 N.C. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1986

“Taxation is the rule; exemption the exception,” Odd Fellows v. Swain, 217 N.C. 632, 637 , 9 S.E. 2d 365, 368 (1940), and one claiming an exemption has the burden of establishing that he is entitled to it. … Canteen Services v. Johnson, Comr. of Revenue, 256 N.C. 155 , 123 S.E. 2d 582 , 91 A.L.R. 2d 1127 (1962). The Commission properly concluded that K-Mart failed to establish its right to the exemption.

State v. Gamble

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 2020

In July 2016, Defendant informed Brushy Mountain’s Board of Directors that the nonprofit was out of funds. … See State v. Cobb, 187 N.C.

Leonard v. Bell

254 N.C. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017

Bell personally evaluated plaintiff nine times and, at the time of the seventh evaluation in June 2013, submitted a request for an MRI to the Utilization Review Board (the “Review Board”). Dr. … See Veazey v.

Brundage v. Foye

118 N.C. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1995

Perry, Brown & Levin by Cedric R. Perry and Charles E. Craft, Wilson, for defendants-appellants. JOHN, Judge. … See Napowsa v.

Cauble v. Cauble

133 N.C. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1999

Pittman v. Pittman, 114 N.C. App. 808, 810 , 443 S.E.2d 96, 97 (1994). … Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991).

State v. Sneed

161 N.C. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2003

State v. Vaughn, 130 N.C. … Following State v.

Meek v. Atkinson

17 S.C.L. 84 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1828

means of duress of the person, imposes no obligation on the party to be bound, and deprives him of no right, is a proposition which no one will be disposed to controvert: and it would seem, according to the cases of Collins v. … Westbury and Brown, 2 Bay, 211 , and Sasportas v.