Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
1.48s
246 N.C. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2016
Rice talked to Kirkbride about adding Brannon to the Neogence board of directors, and they agreed to add Brannon. Together, Rice, Kirkbride, and Brannon formed Neogence’s initial board of directors. … To require every communication a director has with a third party to be formally approved in advance by the Board or to be made by the Board as a whole is unreasonable.
Modified by Piazza v. Kirkbride, 372 N.C. 137 (2019)Cited 28 timesPublished187 N.C. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007
As defendant and the officers were standing next to Fisher's car, defendant told Officer William Brown ("Officer Brown") she had a handgun in her pants. Defendant claimed the gun belonged to Fisher. … State v. Fernandez, 346 N.C. 1, 11 , 484 S.E.2d 350, 357 (1997). B.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSnuggs v. STANLY CTY. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH
303 S.E.2d 646 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1983
Tommie Norwood, Members, Stanly County Board of Health; County of Stanly, a body politic Beecher R. … In Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublished97 N.C. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 1990
Lumbee River Electric Corp. v. … In Gilmore v.
Reversed on other grounds by Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93 (1991)Cited 8 timesPublished264 N.C. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 2019
V. Analysis A. … Concerned Citizens v. Holden Enterprises, 329 N.C. 37, 54-55, 404 S.E.2d 677, 688 (1991) (1991) (citation omitted); see Thompson v. Town of White Lake, __ N.C.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.
54 N.C. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981
Peele v. Powell, 156 N.C. 553 , 73 S.E. 234 (1911). … Goldsmith v. Erwin, 183 F. 2d 432 (4th Cir. 1950).
Cited 1 timesPublished23 N.C. App. 732 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1974
State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348 , 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967) ; Dilday v. Board of Education, 267 N.C. 438 , 148 S.E. 2d 513 (1966) ; Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67 , 136 S.E. 2d 240 (1964) ; In re Register, 5 N.C. … App. 29 , 167 S.E. 2d 802 (1969) ; Midgett v. Midgett, 5 N.C. App. 74 , 168 S.E. 2d 53 (1969).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBurchette v. East Coast Millwork Distributors, Inc.
149 N.C. App. 802 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 2002
We rely on our Court’s decision in Russos v. Wheaton Indus., 145 N.C. … Brown v. S & N Communications, Inc. 124 N.C. App. 320, 330-31 , 477 S.E.2d 197, 203 (1996).
Cited 7 timesPublishedHumana Hosp. Corp. Inc. v. Dept. of Human Resources, Div. of Facility Services
81 N.C. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986
application HBC indicated that in admitting uninsured, non-emergency indigents to the proposed new facility its policy was to require a deposit commensurate with the treatment anticipated; that policy was later changed by HBC’s board … G.S. 150A-5H5); Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977).
Cited 16 timesPublished234 N.C. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2014
Bailey v. State, 353 N.C. 142, 156, 540 S.E.2d 313, 322 (2000). … In State v. Hammons, __ N.C.
Cited 23 timesPublished70 N.C. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1984
State v. Hicks, 241 N.C. 156, 159-60 , 84 S.E. 2d 545, 547 (1954); State v. Allen, supra. … Brown, 300 N.C. 41 , 265 S.E. 2d 191 (1980) which was decided prior to the Supreme Court’s adoption of the current amendment to Rule 10(b)(2), Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Cited 5 timesPublished91 N.C. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1988
State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E. 2d 856 (1984); State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972). … See G.S. 14-27.5; State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447 , 284 S.E. 2d 298 (1981).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2019
Board of County Commissioners, 966 F. Supp. 1049 (D. … State v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. at ___, 827 S.E.2d 534 (2019).
Cited 0 timesPublished144 N.C. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001
The Wake County Board of Elections denied his request and Mr. Barker filed an appeal to the North Carolina Board of Elections. After a hearing, the State Board dismissed Mr. Barker’s appeal. *137 Shortly thereafter, Mr. … Long v. Smitherman, 251 N.C. 682, 684 , 111 S.E.2d 834, 836 (1960).
Cited 0 timesPublishedO'CONNOR v. Corbett Lumber Corp.
84 N.C. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1987
Hale v. Power Co., 40 N.C. App. 202 , 252 S.E. 2d 265 (1979). … In Semler v.
Cited 16 timesPublished137 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 2000
Plaintiff did not receive any compensation for mowing or for appearing before the Board of Adjustment. … In Tharp v. Southern Gables, 125 N.C.
Cited 19 timesPublishedIn Re Annex. Ord. No. 1219 Adopt. by Asheville
62 N.C. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1983
Upon review the judge may examine the annexation proceedings to determine only whether the municipal governing board substantially complied with the requirements of the applicable annexation statutes. Id.; Humphries v. … See Moody v. Carrboro, 301 N.C. 318 , 271 S.E. 2d 265 (1980), reh. denied, 301 N.C. 728 , 274 S.E. 2d 230 ; Conover v. Newton, 297 N.C. 506 , 256 S.E. 2d 216 (1979); McKenzie v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNortheast Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. City of Hickory
143 N.C. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2001
Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C.App. 612, 614 , 300 *772 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983). … See Brown v. Town of Davidson, 113 N.C.App. 553, 556 , 439 S.E.2d 206, 208 (1994)(zoning decisions are legislative acts).
Cited 5 timesPublished102 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1991
V; N.C. Const, art. I, § 19. We disagree. … United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487, 496 (1989). The U.S.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2022
First, in Watson v. … But those boarding services are unrelated to the claims in this case; they were invoices for boarding Beau at the Schaub Defendants’ farm in Florida and have no connection to the sale of Season and, later,
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna