Case law

Hollowell v. Hollowell

18 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 23, 1973

Toms v. Brown, 218 N.C. 295 , 195 S.E. 781 (1938). … Yount v. Yount, 258 N.C. 236 , 128 S.E. 2d 613 (1962).

Thompson v. Kyles

48 N.C. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 1980

(Referring to poster board). By the way that’s 1260 hours, considering 15 hours a day, 15 hours for those many days. … (Referring to poster board). What is it worth?”

Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of Medicine

45 N.C. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1980

Several employees and the manager of the furniture company boarded a company truck one Saturday evening, drove to Morehead City, and camped in the truck for the night. … In Barber v. Minges, 223 N.C. 213 , 25 S.E. 2d 837 (1943), employee was injured while on a fishing trip.

MW Clearing & Grading, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

171 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

Little v. Board of Dental Examiners, 64 N.C. App. 67, 69 , 306 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1983). … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 540 (1977).

Town of Ayden v. Town of Winterville

143 N.C. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2001

. § 160A-31 provides in pertinent part: *138 (a) The governing board of any municipality may annex by ordinance any area contiguous to its boundaries upon presentation to the governing board of a petition signed by the owners … See also City of Raleigh v. R.R.

Dollar v. Town of Cary

153 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 2002

See Dennis v. Raleigh, 253 N.C. 400, 405 , 116 S.E.2d 923, 927 (I960) (city is permitted to advertise its advantages); see also Bardolph v. Arnold, 112 N.C. … Bd. of Educ., 98 A.2d 673 (N.J. 1953) (board of education was not permitted to fund advertising promoting voting for school bonds).

Johnson v. Skinner

99 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1990

In Kraemer v. Moore, 67 N.C. … Two months before the collision Green told Brown that General Manager Dan Nipper had given him permission to use the plates.

Ramsey v. Southern Industrial Constructors Inc.

178 N.C. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2006

.”); Boyce v. … ’s prerogative in finding the employee is a traveling employee.”); Brown v.

State v. Bullard

79 N.C. App. 440 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1986

State v. Redfern, 291 N.C. 319 , 230 S.E. 2d 152 (1976). … G.S. 15A-1340.2(4); State v. Brown, 314 N.C. 588 , 336 S.E. 2d 388 (1985). *444 For the foregoing reasons, we hold that defendant had a fair trial free of prejudicial error. No error. Judges Webb and Parker concur.

In Re the Appeal of Bosley

29 N.C. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1976

In King v. … King v. Baldwin, supra. Equality of appraisal, with resulting equity in taxation, is fundamental in the Machinery Act.

In re: Est. of Johnson

264 N.C. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 2019

V. Analysis A. … Concerned Citizens v. Holden Enterprises, 329 N.C. 37, 54-55, 404 S.E.2d 677, 688 (1991) (1991) (citation omitted); see Thompson v. Town of White Lake, __ N.C.

Weeks v. Town of Coats

121 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 1996

After conducting a public hearing, the Town Board of Commissioners (the Board) adopted an ordinance on 13 May 1993 annexing each of the four areas proposed. Property owners in three of the areas appealed. … Lowe v. *475 Town of Mebane, 76 N.C. App. 239, 244 , 332 S.E.2d 739, 743 (1985) (citing Greene v. Town of Valdese, 306 N.C. 79 , 291 S.E.2d 630, 633 (1982)).

Snuggs v. STANLY CTY. DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH

303 S.E.2d 646 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1983

Tommie Norwood, Members, Stanly County Board of Health; County of Stanly, a body politic Beecher R. … In Martinez v.

Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

133 N.C. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1999

The preceding appeals are: Faulkenbury v. Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System, 108 N.C. App. 357 , 424 S.E.2d 420 , aff’d per curiam, 335 N.C. 158 , 436 S.E.2d 821 (1993); Woodard v. … Duggins v. Board of Examiners, 25 N.C. App. 131, 137 , 212 S.E.2d 657, 662 (1975), aff’d, 294 N.C. 120 , 240 S.E.2d 406 (1978).

Zinn v. Walker

87 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1987

Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634 , 170 S.E. 2d 477 (1969). Moreover, the parties’ intentions which are controlling in contract construction, Cordaro v. Singleton, 31 N.C. … Yates v. Brown, supra; Dynamics Corp. of America, supra; 17 Am. Jur. 2d Contracts, § 224, p. 668 (1964).

Washington Housing Authority v. North Carolina Housing Authorities Risk Retention Pool

130 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1998

Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless Ins. Co., 72 N.C. … See National Mutual Insurance Company v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., 177 W.Va. 734 , 356 S.E.2d 488 (1987); Interstate Fire and Casualty Co. v.

Letendre v. Currituck Cnty.

817 S.E.2d 920 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

the Board of Adjustment could not adequately represent the interests of the proposed intervenor. … See Councill v. Town of Boone Bd. of Adjust. , 146 N.C.

Carolinas Medical Center v. Employers & Carriers Listed in Exhibit A

172 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp., 315 N.C. 127, 137 , 337 S.E.2d 477, 483 (1985). It is a “well-settled rule that a statute’s constitutionality shall be determined by the judiciary, not an administrative board.” Meads v. … Woodard v.

Kath v. H.D.A. Entertainment, Inc.

120 N.C. App. 264 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1995

See Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 287 , 350 S.E.2d 111, 115 (1986) (finding that the “most significant[]” factor in determining the proper forum is who initiated the relationship between the parties). … See also Modern Globe, Inc. v. Spellman, 45 N.C.

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Lackey

94 N.C. App. 553 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1989

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56; Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523 , 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). In appropriate cases summary judgment may be granted in favor of the non-movant. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c); A-S-P Associates v. … In Mennonite Board of Missions v.