Case law

State v. Murphy

56 N.C. App. 771 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1982

See State v. Thompson, 297 N.C. 285 , 254 S.E. 2d 526 (1979); State v. Evans, 25 N.C. App. 459 , 213 S.E. 2d 389 (1975). … State v. Britt, 288 N.C. *774 699 , 220 S.E. 2d 283 (1975); State v. Brown, 39 N.C. App. 548 , 251 S.E. 2d 706 , cert. denied, 297 N.C. 302 (1979). The record does not support a finding of prejudicial error.

Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.

70 N.C. App. 221 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1984

They rely on American Foods v. … See Brown v. Brown, 47 N.C. App. 323 , 267 S.E. 2d 345 (1980). However, we must conclude that the court considered these factors in determining the reasonable hourly rate for the attorney’s services.

Doby v. Fowler

49 N.C. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

In State v. … See also, Brown v. Buchanan, 194 N.C. 675 , 140 S.E. 749 (1927); Nicholson v. Lumber Co., 156 N.C. 59 , 72 S.E. 86 (1911); but see In Re Will of Hall, 252 N.C. 70, 87 , 113 S.E. 2d 1, 13 (1960); 89 C.J.S. Trial § 466.

State v. Robinson

97 N.C. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1990

State v. Brown, 85 N.C. App. 583 , 355 S.E.2d 225 , disc. rev. denied, 320 N.C. 172 , 358 S.E.2d 57 (1987). Substantial evidence of each element is necessary. State v. Bullard, 312 N.C. 129 , 322 S.E.2d 370 (1984). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984).

State v. Vert

39 N.C. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1978

State v. Banks, supra; State v. Dammons, 293 N.C. 263 , 237 S.E. 2d 834 (1977). And see State v. … The Court pointed out that the Legislature may establish a parole system and may assign the granting of parole and supervision of parolee to the Board of Paroles, and that it may give to the Board the option of prescribing

State v. Noffsinger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2022

Gardner, 315 N.C. 444, 454, 340 S.E.2d 701, 709 (1986) (citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 (1977)). ¶8 In Blockburger v. … Brown, 432 U.S. at 169 n.7. ¶ 11 The United States Supreme Court applied the Diaz exception in Garrett v.

Carlton v. Carlton

145 N.C. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

See Starco, Inc. v. AMG Bonding and Ins. Services, Inc., 124 N.C. … In Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C.

Miller Grading & Construction Co. v. Luckey

44 N.C. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1979

Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979). Appeal dismissed. Judges Vaughn and Webb concur.

Burke v. Harrington

35 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1978

Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600, 605 , 187 S.E. 2d 52 (1972). … Hall v. Board of Elections, supra, page 609. The record discloses that at one point in the trial proceedings the able trial judge alluded to Donnell v.

Town of Spencer v. Town of East Spencer

129 N.C. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1998

In City of Raleigh v. R. R. … In City of Raleigh v. R. R.

Lake Gaston Estates Property Owners Ass'n v. County of Warren

186 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2007

Respondent petitioned the Board to rezone 4.78 acres comprised of lots B-35 and B-36 and the reserved area from “Lakeside Business” to “Lakeside Residential.” The Board granted the petition on 1 December 2003. … Langdon v. Langdon, 183 N.C. App. 471, 475 , 644 S.E.2d 600, 603 (2007) (citing Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97 , 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991)).

Harris v. Tri-Arc Food Systems, Inc.

165 N.C. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

These fasteners held up two 1x9 oak boards, oak shoe molds, and fluorescent lights which ran inside the facade. … See Vogh v. Geer, 171 N.C. 672 , 676, 88 S.E. 874, 876 (1916). Our Supreme Court in Nelson v.

Town of Hillsborough v. Smith

4 N.C. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1969

Such permit, however, is discretionary with the Board of Adjustment.” … Tremarco Corp. v. Garzio, 161 A. 2d 241 (N.J.); Clairmont Development Co. v.

FAZ OF RTP, LLC v. 55 & ALLENDOWN, LLC

603 S.E.2d 364 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 2004

Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93 , 97, 408 S.E.2d 729 , 731 (1991). However, conclusions of law are fully reviewable on appeal; Teasley v. … See Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 670, 153 S.E.2d 335 , 338 (1967). IV. Analysis This is a case of contract interpretation.

State v. Styles

93 N.C. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 16, 1989

State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 174 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 584 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 103 S.Ct. 503 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982). … See State v.

State v. Murray

192 N.C. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 61 L. … State v.

State v. Walker

66 N.C. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1984

In State v. Jamerson, 64 N.C. … Watson told defendant that he would return soon and pick up the drugs, which were placed in a brown paper bag on defendant’s bed.

State v. Cannon

216 N.C. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2011

State v. Brown, 85 N.C. App. 583, 589 , 355 S.E.2d 225, 229 (citation omitted), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 172 , 358 S.E.2d 57 (1987). … See Brown, 85 N.C.

Scher v. Antonucci

77 N.C. App. 810 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1985

Board of Transportation v. Rand, 299 N.C. 476, 483 , 263 S.E. 2d 565, 570 (1980); see also G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51(a); Investment Properties v. Norburn, 281 N.C. 191, 197 , 188 S.E. 2d 342, 346 (1972). … Board of Transportation v. Rand, supra; Clif *812 ford v. River Bend Plantation, 55 N.C. App. 514, 521 , 286 S.E. 2d 352, 356 (1982). N.C. Gen.

State v. Huss

223 N.C. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2012

We determined that “[g]iven the evidence of Brown’s age, frailty, and physical limitations, there is evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that Brown was not able to actively oppose or resist her attacker … See State v.