Opinion

Miller Grading & Construction Co. v. Luckey

  • 44 N.C. App. 378
  • 260 S.E.2d 774
  • 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 3258
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Dec 18, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Martinharry
On the bench
Harry, Martin, Vaughn, Webb
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.9%

The opinion

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Appellant violated Rule 9(c)(4) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure by failing to number the pages of the record on appeal. She also violated Rule 10(a), (c), by failing to make her exceptions in the record the basis of assignments of error and failing to list the exceptions after the assignments of error with identification of the pages in the record where they appear. In her brief, defendant failed to refer to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the questions argued and failed to refer to pages of the record where they appear. This violates App. R. 28(b)(3).

Exceptions not preserved and set forth as required by the Rules are deemed abandoned. For these reasons the appeal is subject to dismissal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Vaughn and Webb concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.