Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.27s

  • In re: Lowe's Home Ctrs.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

    Lowe’s concludes, “[g]iven that the Board did not even discuss Section 105-287 or the Union County [S]chedule of [V]alues, the Commission properly concluded that the Board did not intend to ‘correct an appraisal error … resulting from a misapplication’ of the [S]chedule of [V]alues” at the time of the 2017 Revaluation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.

    150 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2002

    In the present case, CCHS was the same type of corporation, governed by a board of trustees who were appointed by the Cumberland County Board of Commissioners. … See also Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303 , 222 S.E.2d 412 (1976).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McNeill v. Harnett County

    97 N.C. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 1990

    See Amherst Builders Ass’n v. City of Amherst, 61 Ohio St. 2d 345, 347 , 402 N.E.2d 1181, 1183 (1980); but see Robinson v. … In Town of Spring Hope v.

    Reversed on other grounds by McNeill v. Harnett County, 327 N.C. 552 (1990)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re At

    662 S.E.2d 917 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2008

    In re McKinney, 158 N.C.App. 441, 443 , 581 S.E.2d 793, 795 (2003) (quoting Haker-Volkening v. Haker, 143 N.C.App. 688, 693 , 547 S.E.2d 127, 130 (2001) and Harris v. … Jones v. Brinson, 238 N.C. 506, 509 , 78 S.E.2d 334, 337 (1953) (citations omitted). Under N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bostic

    121 N.C. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1995

    See State v. … Brown testified that defendant offered to pay Mr. Brown if he “just ke[pt] [his] mouth shut.” Mr. Hill testified that defendant told him defendant killed the victim.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Swan Beach Corolla, L. L.C. v. Cnty. of Currituck

    805 S.E.2d 567 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Davis v. Iredell County

    9 N.C. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1970

    This falls clearly within the rule laid down in Adams v. Durham, 189 N.C. 232 , 126 S.E. 611 , where the city wanted to build an auditorium with funds received from the sale of a lot and city building. … See also Goswick v. Durham, 211 N.C. 687 , 191 S.E. 728 , where the Court said: “. . .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Pinewood Development Corp.

    176 N.C. App. 704 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 2006

    Brown v. Brown, 91 N.C. App. 335, 339 , 371 S.E.2d 752, 755 (1988) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). … Revelle v. Chamblee, 168 N.C. App. 227, 231 , 606 S.E.2d 712, 714 (2005).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Irby v. Freese

    206 N.C. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2010

    Between 17 January and 15 February 2008, the Board of Directors of the HOA agreed that the HOA would fund a portion of this litigation. … P’ship v. Simpson, — N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Bryant

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 2025

    STATE V. … Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Hughes, by and Through Ingram

    253 N.C. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2017

    Mandell v. … See, e.g., Jacobs v. Barr, 959 F.2d 313 (1992); Shibayama v. United States, 55 Fed. Cl. 720 (2002); Obadele v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 432 (2002).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hilliard v. Hilliard

    146 N.C. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2001

    Hilliard, and the plat containing a turning radius on Tract A-13 did not in fact mislead the Warren County Planning Board because the Board never relied on the statement of the Plaintiff or his plat of survey (Defendants’ … Hice v. Hi-Mil, Inc., 301 N.C. 647, 651 , 273 S.E.2d 268, 270 (1981).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thrash Ltd. P'ship v. County of Buncombe

    195 N.C. App. 727 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2009

    Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 281 N.C. 715 , 720, 190 S.E.2d 175 , 179 (1972); see also Surplus Co. v. … See Sandy Mush at 168, 595 S.E.2d at 237 ; see also Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 468, 202 S.E.2d 129 , 135-36 (1974).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Bunn

    36 N.C. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1978

    They found one pound of marijuana in the brown paper bag. Defendant was then arrested. … State v. Allen, 282 N.C. 503, 515 , 194 S.E. 2d 9, 18 (1973); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 453 (1925).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

    47 N.C. App. 203 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

    Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788 , 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oakley v. Thomas

    112 N.C. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1993

    Co. v. Knudsen, 109 N.C. … Accord Karlson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The Town of Carrboro v. Slack

    261 N.C. App. 525 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

    Brown v. Weaver-Rogers -5- THE TOWN OF CARRBORO V. SLACK Opinion of the Court Assocs., Inc., 131 N.C. … Brown, 131 N.C. App. at 123, 505 S.E.2d at 324.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Manning v. County of Halifax

    166 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

    However, the trial court's conclusions of law are reviewable de novo. " Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420 , 423, 524 S.E.2d 95 , 98 (2000) (citations omitted). … See State v. Fluker, 139 N.C. App. 768 , 776-77, 535 S.E.2d 68 , 74 (2000); State v. Thomas, 332 N.C. 544 , 553-54, 423 S.E.2d 75 , 80 (1992), overruled on other grounds by State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Robinson

    26 N.C. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1975

    State v. Brown, 20 N.C. App. 483 , 201 S.E. 2d 577 (1974), and cases cited therein. We have examined the record proper and' find no error. No error. Judges Vaughn and Clark concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. Howard

    147 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2001

    Howard, was the secretary/treasurer and also a member of the board of directors. The plaintiff was the remaining member of the board of directors. … In Meiselman v. Meiselman, 309 N.C. 279 , 307 S.E.2d 551 (1983), our Supreme Court noted that N.C. Gen.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.