Opinion

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

  • 47 N.C. App. 203
  • 266 S.E.2d 722
  • 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Jun 3, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Hill
On the bench
Arnold, Hill, Martin, Robert
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 52.5%

The opinion

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788 , 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.